Citation patterns, the Matilda effect and gender bias in communication & media Studies scientific output in Ibero-America (1980-2022)
Article Sidebar
104)How to Cite
354
Abstract
This article analyses diachronically the role of women in the field of communication & media studies in Ibero-America by studying the presence or absence of women in the bibliography of a selection of articles taken from 60 communication academic journals in 9 countries (Spain, Portugal, Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru) between 1980 and 2022. This study measures the degree of visibility of female scientists and their contribution and compares it statistically to that of their male counterparts by quantifying from a gender perspective the citation patterns of authors of the 484 scientific articles included in the study. The findings showed that the visibility of the female researchers-authors increased over time. Furthermore, an over-citation of publications by male researchers was also found. Last, in one of the periods analysed, in the years between 1996-2010, gender homophily was found, i.e., female researchers tended to cite more women than men during this period.
References
Arbeláez Gómez, M. C. & Onrubia Goñi, J. (2016). Análisis bibliométrico y de contenido. Dos metodologías complementarias para el análisis de la revista colombiana Educación y Cultura. Revista De Investigaciones, 14(23), 14-31. https://doi.org/10.22383/ri.v14i1.5
Arroyave-Cabrera, J. & González-Pardo, R. (2022). Investigación bibliométrica de comunicación en revistas científicas en América Latina (2009-2018). Comunicar, 30(70), 85-96. https://doi.org/10.3916/C70-2022-07
Boschini, A. & Sjögren, A. (2007). Is team formation gender neutral? Evidence from coauthorship patterns. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.1086/510764
Cáceres, M. D. & Díaz, M. J. (2022). El liderazgo de la mujer en la investigación en Comunicación en España. Revista Española De Documentación Científica, 45(2). https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2022.2.1859
Caffarel, C., Izquierdo, P., & Núñez, S. (2017). ¿Cómo investiga la mujer cuando investiga sobre la mujer en comunicación? In E. Rodríguez (Coord.), Propuestas de investigación en áreas de vanguardia (pp. 73-86). Madrid: Tecnos.
Caldevilla, D. & Del Valle, C. (2011). Análisis de las trayectorias de mujeres chilenas a partir de sus publicaciones científicas en idioma español. Parte I. Madrid: Visión Libros.
Chan, H. F. & Torgler, B. (2020). Gender differences in performance of top cited scientists by field and country. Scientometrics, 125, 2421-2447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03733-w
Chiesa, C. (2022). Investigadoras de la comunicación: un enfoque necesario (Reseña bibliográfica). Avatares de la Comunicación y la Cultura, 23, 1-5. Retrieved from https://publicaciones.sociales.uba.ar/index.php/avatares/article/view/7603
Corona Berkin, S. (2018). El aporte de las mujeres a la investigación crítica de la comunicación en América Latina. Comunicação & Educação, 23(2), 121-131. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9125.v23i2p121-13
Del Valle, C., Caldevilla, D., & Soledad, N. (2012). Valoración a las investigadoras chilenas sobre los actuales índices editoriales. Ciencias de la información, 43(1), 45-50. Retrieved from https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=181423784007
Dorsten, A. M. (2012). “Thinking dirty”: Digging up three founding “matriarchs” of communication studies. Communication Theory, 22(1), 25-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01398.x
Dorsten, A. M. (2016). Women in communication research. In K. B. Jensen & R. Craig (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of communication theory and philosophy (pp. 1-13). Chichester: Wiley & Sons.
Fleck, C. (2021). Lazarsfeld’s wives, or: what happened to women sociologists in the twentieth century. International Review of Sociology, 31(1), 49-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2021.1926672
Fuentes Navarro, R. (2020). La trayectoria del GT de Teoría y Metodología de la Investigación en Comunicación de ALAIC: datos para un análisis auto-reflexivo. Memorias XV Congreso de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Investigadores de la Comunicación. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11912/8688
García-Jiménez, L. (2019). En defensa de la comunicación: una propuesta para la acción ética, democrática e investigadora. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
García-Jiménez, L. (2021). Aportaciones femeninas a las teorías de la comunicación: una propuesta para la docencia y la ciencia. Anà lisi: Quaderns de Comunicació i Cultura, 65, 121-135. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/analisi.3327
García-Jiménez, L. & Simonson, P. (2021). Roles, aportaciones e invisibilidades femeninas en el campo de la investigación en comunicación. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, 12(2), 13-15. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM.20163
García-Jiménez, L. & Herrero, E. (2022a). “Nunca lo lograrás, eres demasiado guapa”: voces de mujeres investigadoras en comunicación. IC-Revista Científica de Información y Comunicación, 19, 385-410. Retrieved from https://icjournal-ojs.org/index.php/IC-Journal/article/view/706/512
García-Jiménez, L. & Herrero, E. (2022b). Narrating the field of communication through some female voices: Women’s experiences and stories in academia. Communication Theory, 32(2), 289-297. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtac002
García-Jiménez, L., Torrado-Morales, S., & Díaz, J. M. (2022). El rol de la mujer en la ciencia y la docencia en comunicación: análisis a partir de los programas universitarios en España. Revista De Comunicación, 21(2), 91-113. https://doi.org/10.26441/RC21.2-2022-A5
Goyanes, M., Demeter, M., Grané, A., Tóth, T., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2023). Research patterns in communication (2009-2019): Testing female representation and productivity differences, within the most cited authors and the field. Scientometrics, 128, 137-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04575-4
Heram, Y. & Gándara, S. (2021). Pioneras en los estudios latinoamericanos de comunicación. Buenos Aires: Yamila Heram.
Herrero, E. & García-Jiménez, L. (2023). De una “presencia invisibilizada” a ser “buenas chicas”: roles de mujeres investigadoras en el campo de la comunicación (1930-1990). methaodos. revista de ciencias sociales, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.17502/mrcs.v11i2.720
Herrero, E. (2024). Aportaciones e influencia de mujeres investigadoras en las teorías de la comunicación. Una aproximación a la Escuela de Columbia (1935-1955). Doctoral dissertation, Universidad de Murcia.
Holman, L. & Morandin, C. (2019). Researchers collaborate with same-gendered colleagues more often than expected across the life sciences. PLoS One, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216128
Hristova, E. D. (2022). Research and publishing at the bureau of applied social research: The gendering of commercial and academic work. International Journal of Communication, 16, 655-663. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/18731
Hristova, E. D., Dorsten, A. M., & Stabile, C. A. (2024). The ghost reader: Recovering women’s contributions to media studies. London: Goldsmith.
Jadidi, M., Karimi, F., Lietz, H., & Wagner, C. (2018). Gender disparities in science? Dropout, productivity, collaborations and success of male and female computer scientists. Advances in Complex Systems, 21(3&4). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525917500114
Jansen, S. C. (1993). “The future is not what it used to be”: Gender, history and communication studies. Communication Theory, 3(2), 136-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1993.tb00063.x
Klaus, E. & Seethaler, J. (eds.) (2016). What do we really know about Herta Herzog? Exploring the life and work of a pioneer of communication research. Berlin: Peter Lang.
Knobloch-Westerwick, S. & Glynn, C. J. (2013). The Matilda effect-role congruity effects on scholarly communication: a citation analysis of Communication Research and Journal of Communication articles. Communication Research, 40(1), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211418339
Krippendorff, K. (2002). Metodología de análisis de contenido. Teoría y práctica. Barcelona: Paidós.
Kwiek, M. & Roszka. W. (2021). Gender disparities in international research collaboration: A study of 25,000 university professors. Journal of Economic Surveys, 35(5), 1344-1380. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12395
Larivière, V., Ni, C., Gingras, Y., Cronin, B., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in Science. Nature, 504, 211-213. https://doi.org/10.1038/504211a
Lee, I. (2014). Publish or perish: The myth and reality of academic publishing. Language teaching, 47(2), 250-261. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000504
Lerchenmueller, M., Hoisl, K., & Schmallenbach, L. (2019). Homophily, biased attention, and the gender gap in science. DRUID19 Conference, 19-21 June 2019. Retrieved from https://conference.druid.dk/Druid/?confId=59
Llorens, A. et al. (2021). Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions. Neuron, 109(13), 2047-2074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.002
Martín Algarra, M., Serrano-Puche, J., & Rebolledo, M. (2018). La mujer en la investigación en comunicación en España. AdComunica, 15, 65-87. https://doi.org/10.6035/2174-0992.2018.15.5
Masip, P. (2011). Efecto Aneca: producción española en comunicación en el Social science citation index. Anuario ThinkEPI, 5, 206-210. Retrieved from https://thinkepi.scimagoepi.com/index.php/ThinkEPI/article/view/30505
Mayer, V., Press, A., Verhoeven, D., & Sterne, J. (2018). How do we intervene in the stubborn persistence of patriarchy in communication scholarship? In D. T. Scott & A. Shaw (Eds.), Interventions. Communication theory and practice (pp. 53-82). New York/Oxford: Peter Lang Verlag.
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (2023). Científicas en cifras 2023. Madrid: Unidad de Mujeres y Ciencia; FECYT.
Rajkó, A., Herendy, C., Goyanes, M., & Demeter, M. (2023). The Matilda effect in communication research: The effects of gender and geography on usage and citations across 11 countries. Communication Research, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502221124389
Repiso, R., Berlanga, I., Said-hung, E., & Castillo-Esparcia, A. (2020). Titularidad y cátedras en Comunicación en España (2000-2019). Distribución, ritmos de promoción, transferencia entre universidades y endogamia. Profesional de la Información, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.jul.22
Rodríguez, C., Magallanes, C., Marroquín, A., & Rincón, O. (2020). Mujeres de la comunicación. Bogotá: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung FES.
Rossiter, M. (1993). The Matthew Matilda effect in science. Social Studies of Science, 23(2), 325-341. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/285482
Rowland, A. L. & Simonson, P. (2014). The founding mothers of communication research: toward a history of a gendered assemblage. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 31(1), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2013.849355
Saborit-Rodríguez, A., Morales-Pérez, M., Macola-Ross, D. D. L. C., & Vera-Aguilera, L. (2022). El sexismo en la historia de las ciencias: efecto Matilda. Revista Médica Electrónica, 44(4), 758-768. Retrieved from http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1684-18242022000400758
Segado-Boj, F. J., Prieto-Gutiérrez, J. J., & Quevedo-Redondo, R. (2021). El Efecto Matilda en la red de coautorías Hispanoamericana en Comunicación. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, 12(2), 77-95. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM.18971
Signorielli, N. (1996). Women in communication: a biographical sourcebook. Westport: Greenwood Press.
Simonson, P. & Archer, L. (2011). Women in media research. Documentary Out of the question.
Simonson, P. (2012). Mail and females at the Bureau: the happiness game in the gendered contexts of early U.S. communication research. International Journal of Communication, 6(1), 1277-1289. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1631/760
Torrado-Morales, S. & García-Jiménez, L. (2023, June 14-15). Analysis of the role of Women in British academic journals in film studies (2010-2020) [Paper presentation]. Doing Women’s Film and Television History Conference VI, University of Sussex, UK. Retrieved from https://dwftvhvi.wordpress.com/
Tuana, N. (2017). Feminist epistemology. The subject of knowledge. In I. Kidd, J. Medina, & G. Pohlhaus (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice (pp. 125-138). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315212043
UNESCO (March 7, 2020). Where are the women university rectors in Latin America? UNESCO-IESALC data reveals that only 18% of the region’s universities have women as rectors. Retrieved from http://www.iesalc.unesco.org/en/2020/03/07/where-are-the-women-university-rectors-in-latin-america-unesco-iesalc-data-reveals-that-only-18-of-the-regions-universities-have-women-as-rectors/
Varão, R. (2021). A first glance at the work of Dorothy Blumenstock Jones. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, 12(2), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM.19325
Vera-Balanza, T. (2012). Periféricas: una propuesta didáctica para Teorías de la Comunicación. Zer, 17(32), 13-27. Retrieved from https://ojs.ehu.eus/index.php/Zer/article/view/6550/5980
Wang, X., Dworkin, J. D., Zhou, D., Stiso, J., Falk, E. B., Bassett, D. S., Zurn, P., & Lydon-Staley, D. M. (2021). Gendered citation practices in the field of communication. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(2), 134-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2021.1960180
Wang, Y. S., Lee, C. J., West, J. D., Bergstrom, C. T., & Erosheva, E. A. (2023). Gender-based homophily in collaborations across a heterogeneous scholarly landscape. PLoS ONE, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283106
Section
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communicaton & Society, the AUTHOR grants exclusive economic and/or exploitation rights: reproduction, distribution, public communication, transformation/translation/creation of derivative works, and commercialisation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal period in force -the author's lifetime and seventy years after his or her death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future publishing modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication, this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.