Beyond detection and correction: Fake news’ «news-ness» and «shareworthiness» as alternative ways to tackle disinformation
Article Sidebar
399)How to Cite
767
Abstract
Fake news is a concern for present-day society. A lot of quality research efforts have focused on how fake news can be detected, and to what extent general warnings, accuracy prompts and fact-checking labels can correct people’s misconceptions. In this work we problematize critically the research questions formulated on fakeness detection and specifically we address two significant alternative (though complementary) approaches: 1) What formal traits and news values do fake news best imitate, which sheds light on what “news” means (irrespective of falsity) since the rise of social media as news source (news-ness assessment), and 2) what factors explain fake news sharing (shareworthiness prediction), which explains why it is shared with a higher intensity than real news, even in the case of awareness that a falsity is being shared. Intertwined with these approaches, two theories compete to best explain fake news’ social pervasiveness and virality: the ignorance theory (aptitudes: be mistaken, confused or careless about assessing news accuracy, resulting in sharing falsehoods unintentionally) and the partisan theory (attitudes: motivated reasoning and political bias which encourages people to knowingly share fake news consistent with their view). The aim is twofold: to identify, compare and challenge the scholars’ underlying assumptions and practical implications, and to draw a coherent narrative that encompasses the motivation to deceive, the social media affordances that make this deception plausible and shareable, and the polarization, intergroup hostility, and the greater exposure to extreme political views that may boost disinformation.
References
Ali, K., Li, C., Zain-ul-abdin, K., & Zaffar, M. A. (2022). Fake news on Facebook: examining the impact of heuristic cues on perceived credibility and sharing intention. Internet Research, 32(1), 379-397. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-10-2019-0442
Alonso García, S. et al. (2020). The Impact of Term Fake News on the Scientific Community. Scientific Performance and Mapping in Web of Science. Social Science 9(73). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9050073
Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 247-271. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0188
Arielli, E. (2018). Sharing as Speech Act. Versus, 127, 243-258.
Bakir, V., & MacStay, A. (2018). Fake News and The Economy of Emotions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 154-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1345645
Barthel, M., Mitchell, A., & Holcomb, J. (2016). Many Americans Believe Fake News Is Sowing Confusion. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://pewrsr.ch/3F3jb3x
Barrera, O. et al. (2020). Facts, alternative facts, and fact checking in times of post-truth politics. Journal of Public Economics, 182, 104-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104123
Becker, H. (1949). The nature and consequences of black propaganda. American Sociological Association, 14(2), 221-235.
Benkler, Y., Faris, R., Roberts, H., & Zuckerman, E. (March 3, 2017). Study: Breitbart-Led Right-Wing Media Ecosystem Altered Broader Media Agenda. Columbia Journalism Review. Retrieved from https://t.ly/Ygpuq
Besser, Y. (2021). Web of lies: hate speech, pseudonyms, the Internet, impersonator trolls, and fake jews in the era of fake news. Ohio State Technology Law Journal, 17(2), 233-275. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=4393206
Brummette, J., DiStaso, M., Vafeiadis, M., & Messner, M. (2018). Read All About It: The Politicization of “Fake News” on Twitter. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(2), 497-517. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018769906
Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and Power (2nd Ed.). Oxford U.P. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190696726.001.0001
Chadwick, A., & Stanyer, J. (2022). Deception as a Bridging Concept in the Study of Disinformation, Misinformation, and Misperceptions: Toward a Holistic Framework. Communication Theory, 32(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtab019
Chadwick, A., Vaccari, C., & O’Loughlin, B. (2018). Do Tabloids Poison the Well of Social Media? Explaining Democratically Dysfunctional News Sharing. Loughborough University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/2134/33261
Chadwick, A., & Vaccari, C. (2019). News sharing on UK social media: Misinformation, disinformation, and correction (Report No. O3C 1). Loughborough University. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3nJzJXS
Cinelli, M. et al. (2021). Dynamics of online hate and misinformation. Scientific Reports, 11, 22083. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01487-w
Clayton, K. et al. (2020). Real Solutions for Fake News? Measuring the Effectiveness of General Warnings and Fact”‘Check Tags in Reducing Belief in False Stories on Social Media. Political Behavior, 42, 1073-1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09533-0
Diehl, T., & Lee, S. (2022). Testing the cognitive involvement hypothesis on social media: ‘News finds me’ perceptions, partisanship, and fake news credibility. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107121
Dijck, J. van (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford U.P.
Duffy, A., Tandoc, E., & Ling, R. (2020) Too good to be true, too good not to share: the social utility of fake news, Information, Communication & Society, 23(13), 1965-1979. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1623904
Edgerly, S., & Vraga, E. K. (2020). That’s Not News: Audience Perceptions of “News-ness” and Why It Matters. Mass Communication and Society, 23(5), 730-754. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2020.1729383
Effron, D., & Raj, A. M. (2019). Misinformation and Morality: Encountering Fake-news Headlines Makes Them Seem Less Unethical to Publish and Share. Psychological Science, 31(1), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619887896
Farkas, J., Schou J., & Neumayer, C. (2018). Cloaked Facebook pages: Exploring fake Islamist propaganda in social media. New Media & Society, 20(5), 1850-1867. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817707759
García-Perdomo, V., Salaverría, R., Kilgo, D. K., & Harlow, S. (2018) To Share or Not to Share. Journalism Studies, 19(8). https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1265896
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Weeks, B., & Ardèvol-Abreu, A. (2017). Effects of the News-Finds-Me Perception in Communication: Social Media Use Implications for News Seeking and Learning About Politics. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 22, 105-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12185
Goldenberg, A. et al. (2023). Homophily and acrophily as drivers of political segregation. Nature Human Behavior, 7, 219-230. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01474-9
Grinberg, N., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Swire-Thompson, B., & Lazer, D. (2019). Fake news on twitter during the 2016 U.S. Presidential election. Science, 363, 374-378. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau2706
Guo, L., & Vargo, C. (2020). “Fake News” and Emerging Online Media Ecosystem: An Integrated Intermedia Agenda-Setting Analysis of the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Communication Research, 47(2), 178-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218777177
Happer, C., Hoskins, A., & Merrin, W. (Eds.) (2019). Trump’s Media War. Palgrave-McMillan.
Hinsley, A., & Holton, A. (2021). Fake News Cues: Examining the Impact of Content, Source, and Typology of News Cues on People’s Confidence in Identifying Mis- and Disinformation. International Journal of Communication, 15, 4984-5003. Retrieved from https://t.ly/hPsN_
Ireton, Ch., & Posetti, J. (Eds.) (2018). Journalism, ‘Fake News’ & Disinformation Handbook for Journalism Education and Training. UNESCO. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/node/295873
Jones, M. J. (2018, June 20). Americans: Much misinformation, bias, inaccuracy in news. Gallup.
Kennedy, J. (2013). Rhetorics of Sharing: Data, Imagination, and Desire. In G. Lovink & M. Rasch (Eds.), Unlike us readers: Social media monopolies and their alternatives (pp. 127-136). Institute of Network Culture.
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480-498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
Kuran, T., & Sunstein, C. R. (1999). Availability cascades and risk regulation. Stanford Law Review, 683-768.
Lazer, D. M. J. et al. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094-1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998
Lee, S., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Munger, K. (2023). Antecedents and consequences of fake news exposure: a two-panel study on how news use and different indicators of fake news exposure affect media trust. Human Communication Research, hqad019. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqad019
Levine, T. R. (2020). Duped: Truth Default Theory and the Social Science of Lying and Deception. The University of Alabama Press.
Li, J., Foley, J. M., Dumdum, O., & Wagner, M. W. (2022). The Power of a Genre: Political News Presented as Fact-Checking Increases Accurate Belief Updating and Hostile Media Perceptions. Mass Communication and Society, 25(2), 282-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2021.1924382
Luo, M., Hancock, J. T., & Markowitz, D. M. (2022). Credibility Perceptions and Detection Accuracy of Fake News Headlines on Social Media: Effects of Truth-Bias and Endorsement Cues. Communication Research, 49(2), 171-195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220921321
Lyons, B. A., Montgomery, J. M., Guess, A. M., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2021). Overconfidence in news judgments is associated with false news susceptibility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(23), e2019527118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2019527118
Marwick, A. E. (2018). Why Do People Share Fake News? A Sociotechnical Model of Media Effects. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 2(2), 474-512. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3Mos90S
Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., Mena, P., Jiang, Shan, & Wilson, Ch. (2021). From Dark to Light: The Many Shades of Sharing Disinformation Online. Media and Communication, 9(1), 134-143. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3409
Mikkelson, D. (2016, November 17). We have a bad news problem, not a fake news problem. Snopes. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3CUPNv9
Mitchell, A., Gottfried, J., Stocking, G., Walker, M., & Fedeli, S. (2019). Many Americans Say Made-Up News is a Critical Problem That Needs to Be Fixed. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://pewrsr.ch/3t1NFk9
Mitchell, A., Jurkowitz, M., Oliphant, J. B., & Shearer, E. (2020, July 30). Americans Who Mainly Get Their News on Social Media Are Less Engaged, Less Knowledgeable. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://pewrsr.ch/437CXY1
Mourão, R., & Robertson, C. T. (2019). Fake News as Discursive Integration: An Analysis of Sites That Publish False, Misleading, Hyperpartisan and Sensational Information. Journalism Studies, 20(14), 2077-2095. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019.1566871
Newman, N. et al. (2024). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2024. Reuters.
Nielsen, R. K., & Graves, L. (2017). ‘News You Don’t Believe’: Audience Perspectives on Fake News. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3nT3vdT
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175.
Osmundsen, M. et al. (2021). Partisan Polarization Is the Primary Psychological Motivation behind Political Fake News Sharing on Twitter. American Political Science Review, 115(3), 999-1015. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000290
Park, A. et al. (2020). Understanding Fake News: A Bibliographic Perspective. Defence Strategic Communications, 8. https://doi.org/10.30966/2018.RIGA.8.4
Park, C. S. (2019). Does Too Much News on Social Media Discourage News Seeking? Mediating Role of News Efficacy Between Perceived News Overload and News Avoidance on Social Media. Social Media + Society, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119872956
Pennycook, G., Epstein, Z. Mosleh, M., Arechar, A. A., Eckles, D., & Rand, D. G. (2021). Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online. Nature, 592, 590-595. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Lazy, Not Biased: Susceptibility to Partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking. Journal of Personality, 88, 185-200. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12476
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). The psychology of fake news. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007
Quevedo Redondo, R., Antona Jimeno, T., & Vicent-Ibáñez, M. (2022). Investigación sobre News Sharing. Una propuesta de análisis bibliométrico. Communication & Society, 35(2), 285-298. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.35.2.285-298
Righetti, N. (2021). Four years of fake news: A quantitative analysis of the scientific literature. First Monday, 26(6-7). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v26i7.11645
Rhodes, S. C. (2022). Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Fake News: How Social Media Conditions Individuals to Be Less Critical of Political Misinformation. Political Communication, 39(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2021.1910887
Robertson, C. T. (2023) Defining News from an Audience Perspective at a Time of Crisis in the United States, Journalism Practice, 17(2), 374-390. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1919178
Rodríguez-Ferrándiz, R. (2023). An overview on fake news phenomenon: From untruth”driven to post”truth”driven approaches. Media and Communication, 11(2), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6315
Rodríguez-Ferrándiz, R., Sánchez-Olmos, C., Hidalgo-Marí, T., & Saquete-Boro, E. (2021). Memetics of deception: spreading local meme hoaxes during COVID-19 1st year. Future Internet, 13(6), 152. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13060152
Rodríguez-Ferrándiz, R., Sánchez-Olmos, C., & Hidalgo-Marí, T. (2023). For the sake of sharing: Fake news as memes. In M. Filimowicz (Ed.), Information Disorder. Algorithms and Society Series (pp. 46-68). Routledge.
Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2019). Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation Palgrave Communication 5, 65. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0279-9
Shearer, E., & Mitchell, A. (2021, January 12). News use across social media platforms in 2020. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://t.ly/S6tSd
Shearer E. et al. (2024). How Americans Get News on TikTok, X, Facebook and Instagram, Pew Research Center, June 14. Retrieved from https://t.ly/s8AwW
Shin, I., Wang L., & Lu, Y. (2022). Twitter and Endorsed (Fake) News: The Influence of Endorsement by Strong Ties, Celebrities, and a User Majority on Credibility of Fake News During the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Communication, 16, 2573-2595. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/18187
Shu, K., Sliva, A., Wang, S, Tang, J., & Liu, H. (2017). Fake news detection on social media: A data mining perspective. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 19, 24-36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3137597.3137600
Sterrett, D. et al. (2019) Who Shared It?: Deciding What News to Trust on Social Media. Digital Journalism, 7(6), 783-801. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1623702
Talwar, S. et al. (2019). Why do people share fake news? Associations between the dark side of social media use and fake news sharing behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 51, 72-82 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.05.026
Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining ‘fake news’: A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital journalism, 6(2), 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
Tandoc, E. C., & Seet, S. K. (2022). War of the Words: How Individuals Respond to “Fake News,” “Misinformation,” “Disinformation,” and “Online Falsehoods. Journalism Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2022.2110929
Tandoc, E. C., Thomas, R. J., & Bishop, L. (2021). What Is (Fake) News? Analyzing News Values (and More) in Fake Stories. Media and Communication, 9(1), 110-119. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3331
Tong, Ch., Gill, H., Li, J., Valenzuela, S., & Rojas H. (2020). “Fake News Is Anything They Say!”
–Conceptualization and Weaponization of Fake News among the American Public. Mass Communication and Society, 23(5), 755-778. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2020.1789661
Trilling, D., Tolochko, P., & Burscher, B. (2017). From Newsworthiness to Shareworthiness: How to Predict News Sharing Based on Article Characteristics. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(1), 38-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016654682
Tsang, S. J. (2021). Motivated Fake News Perception: The Impact of News Sources and Policy Support on Audiences’ Assessment of News Fakeness. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 98(4), 1059-1077. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699020952129
Van Duyn, E. & Collier, J. (2019). Priming and Fake News: The Effects of Elite Discourse on Evaluations of News Media. Mass Communication and Society, 22(1), 29-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2018.1511807
Vargo, C. J., Guo, L., & Amazeen, M. E. (2018). The agenda-setting power of fake news: A big data analysis of the online media landscape from 2014 to 2016. New Media & Society, 20(5), 2028-2049. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817712086
Venturini, T. (2019). From Fake to Junk News, the Data Politics of Online Virality. In D. Bigo, E. Isin & E. Ruppert (Eds.), Data Politics: Worlds, Subjects, Rights (pp. 123-144). Routledge.
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359, 1146-1151. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aap9559
Ward, A., Zheng, J., & Broniarczyk, S. M. (2023). I share, therefore I know? Sharing online content –even without reading it– inflates subjective knowledge. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 33(3), 469-488. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1321
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information Disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe Report DGI(2017)09. Brussels: Concil of Europe. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3DZwt1e
Zhou, X., & Zafarani, R. (2020). A Survey of Fake News: Fundamental Theories, Detection Methods, and Opportunities. ACM Computing Surveys, 53(5). https://doi.org/10.1145/3395046
Section
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communicaton & Society, the AUTHOR grants exclusive economic and/or exploitation rights: reproduction, distribution, public communication, transformation/translation/creation of derivative works, and commercialisation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal period in force -the author's lifetime and seventy years after his or her death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future publishing modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication, this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.