Start making sense. Sociosemiotic contributions to the understanding of Generative Artificial Intelligences
Article Sidebar
647)How to Cite
1101
Abstract
The article delves into the symbiotic relationship between sociosemiotics and AI research, specifically focusing on Generative Artificial Intelligences (GenAI). As GenAI gain traction in verbal and iconic creation, in the context of various cultural and communication theories, sociosemiotics emerges as a key framework for understanding these processes. The article addresses questions such as: How have the relationships between AI research and sociosemiotics evolved? How can sociosemiotics contribute to the understanding of GenAI? If Umberto Eco (1986) distinguished between general semiotics and specific (or applied) semiotics, what would be the main characteristics of a semiotics of Generative AI? In this context, the article’s objectives encompass three dimensions: 1) Tracing the intertwined evolution of sociosemiotics and AI research over 75 years, spotlighting the textual and sociosemiotics contributions; 2) Proposing a series of possible sociosemiotic interventions in the realm of GenAI; and 3) Reflecting on the emergence of an applied semiotics of GenAI. Ultimately, the article encapsulates the intricate interplay between sociosemiotics and GenAI, paving the way for novel insights into AI’s semiotic foundations and its multifaceted implications in contemporary digital creation.
References
Adami, C. (2021). A Brief History of Artificial Intelligence Research. Artificial Life, 27(2), 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1162/artl_a_00349
Bibel, W. (2014). Artificial Intelligence in a Historical Perspective. AI Communications, 27(1), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.3233/AIC-130576
Brier, S. (2007). Cybersemiotics: Why information is not enough. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Buchanan, B. C. (2005). A (Very) Brief History of Artificial Intelligence. AI Magazine, 26, 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v26i4.1848
Chandler, D. (2022). Semiotics: The Basics. London: Routledge.
Cobley, P. & Randviir, A. (2009). Introduction: What is sociosemiotics? Semiótica, 173, 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1515/SEMI.2009.001
Crevier, D. (1993). AI: The Tumultuous Search for Artificial Intelligence. New York, NY: BasicBooks.
Dall’Acqua, A. & Bellentani, F. (2023). How to build a chatbot. A semiotic and linguistic approach. In A. Santangelo & M. Leone (Eds.), Semiotica e intelligenza artificiale (pp. 149-169). Roma: Aracne.
De Saussure, F. (2011). Course in General Linguistics. New York: NY: Columbia University Press.
Eco, U. (1979). A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Eco, U. (1986). Semiotics and Philosophy of Language. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Eco, U. (1992). Interpretation and Overinterpretation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Eco, U. (1994a). Six Walks in the Fictional Woods. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Eco, U. (1994b). The Limits of Interpretation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press
Eco, U. (1999). Kant and the Platypus: Essays on Language and Cognition. London: Secker & Warburg.
Fernández, J. L. (2023). Una mecánica metodológica para el análisis de las mediatizaciones. Buenos Aires: La Crujía.
Ferraro, G. (2018). Semiotica 3.0. 50 idee chiave per un rilancio della scienza della significazione. Roma: Aracne.
Ferraro, G. (2023). Mito e realtà dell’IA: uno sguardo semiotico. In A. Santangelo & M. Leone (Eds.), Semiotica e intelligenza artificiale (pp. 65-90). Roma: Aracne.
Forbus, K. D. (2009). AI and Cognitive Science: The Past and Next 30 Years. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 345-356. https//doi.org/10.1111/j.1756%2D8765.2010.01083.x
Greimas, A. & Fontanille, J. (1992). The Semiotics of Passions: From States of Affairs to States of Feelings. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Greimas, A. (1987a). On Meaning: Selected Writings in Semiotic Theory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Greimas, A. (1987b). Algirdas Julien Greimas mis à la question. In M. Arrivé & J.-C. Coquet (Eds.), Sémiotique en jeu. A partir et autour de l’Å“uvre d’A.J. Greimas (pp. 301-330). Paris-Amsterdam: Hadès-Benjamins.
Greimas, A. & Courtés, J. (1982). Semiotics and Language: An analytical dictionary. Minneapolis, MN: Indiana University Press.
Gudwin, R. & Queiroz, J. (2005). Towards an Introduction to Computational Semiotics. Proceedings of the International Conference on Integration of Knowledge Intensive Multi-agent Systems, Kimas’05: Modelling, Exploration, and Engineering, 393-398. https//doi.org/10.1109/KIMAS.2005.1427113
Haenlein, M. & Kaplan, A. (2019). A Brief History of Artificial Intelligence: On the Past, Present, and Future of Artificial Intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619864925
Ilkou, E. & Koutraki, M. (2020). Symbolic Vs Sub-symbolic AI Methods: Friends or Enemies? Proceedings of the CIKM 2020 Workshops, October 19-20, Galway, Ireland. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340531.3414072
Jakobson, R. (1959). On linguistic aspects of translation. In R. A. Brower (Ed.), On translation (pp. 232–239). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jakobson, R. (1987). Linguistics and Poetics. In R. Jakobson (Ed.), Language in Literature (pp. 62-94). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kurzweil, R. (2005). The Singularity is Near. When humans transcend biology. New York: Penguin.
Kurzweil, R. (2024). The Singularity is Nearer. When we merge with Al. New York: Penguin.
Larson, E. (2021). The Myth of Artificial Intelligence: Why Computers Can’t Think the Way We Do. Cambridge/London: Belknap Press/Harvard University Press.
Leone, M. (2023). Introduzione. In A. Santangelo & M. Leone (Eds.), Semiotica e intelligenza artificiale (pp. 9-18). Roma: Aracne.
Luger, G. (2023). A Brief History and Foundations for Modern Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Semantic Computing, 17(1), 143-70. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793351X22500076
Marrone, G. (2001). Corpi sociali. Processi comunicativi e semiotica del testo. Torino: Einaudi.
Marrone, G. (2010). L’invenzione del testo. Roma/Bari: Laterza
Meunier, J.-G. (1989). Artificial intelligence and sign theory. Semiotica, 77(1-3), 43-64. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1989.77.1-3.43
Meunier, J.-G. (2022). Computational Semiotics. London: Bloomsbury.
Minsky, M. (1974). A Framework for Representing Knowledge. MIT-AI Laboratory Memo 306.
Mitchell, M. (2019). Artificial Intelligence. A guide for thinking humans. London: Pelican.
Muthukrishnan, N., Maleki, F., Ovens, K., Reinhold, C., Forghani, B. & Forghani, R. (2020). Brief History of Artificial Intelligence. Neuroimaging Clinics of North America, 30(4), 393-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2020.07.004
Perron, P. & Fabbri, P. (1992). Foreword. In A. Greimas & J. Fontanille, The Semiotics of Passions: From States of Affairs to States of Feelings (pp. i-xvi). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Propp, V. (1968). Morphology of the Folktale. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Quellet, P. (1989). Introduction: The AI turn’ in semiotics and language sciences. Semiótica, 77, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1989.77.1-3.1
Schank, R. & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Scolari, C. A. (2004). Hacer clic. Hacia una sociosemiótica de las interacciones digitales. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Scolari, C. A. (2009). The sense of the interface: applying Semiotics to HCI research. Semiótica, 177, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2009.067
Scolari, C. A. (2022). Between social semiosis and mediatizations: Toward a dictionary of Eliseo Verón’s theoretical contributions. In Y. Miike & J. Ying (Eds.), The Handbook of Global Interventions in Communication Theory (pp. 269-283). London: Routledge.
Shannon, C. E. & Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press.
Verón, E. (1974). Para una semiología de las operaciones translingüísticas. LENGUajes, 2, 13-35.
Verón, E. (1987). La Semiosis Social. Fragmentos de una teoría de la discursividad. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Vidales, C. & Brier, S. (2021). Introduction to Cybersemiotics: A Transdisciplinary Perspective. Cham: Springer.
Walsh Matthews, S. (2019). Biosémiose vs. Robosémiose. Recherches sémiotiques/Semiotic Inquiry, 39(1-2), 251-268. https://doi.org/10.7202/1076235ar
Walsh Matthews, S. & Danesi, M. (2019). AI: A Semiotic Perspective. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 15(2), 199-216. https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2019-0013
Section
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communicaton & Society, the AUTHOR grants exclusive economic and/or exploitation rights: reproduction, distribution, public communication, transformation/translation/creation of derivative works, and commercialisation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal period in force -the author's lifetime and seventy years after his or her death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future publishing modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication, this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.