Stolen innocence? Observance of the EU Directive on presumption of innocence by Spanish crime reporting
Article Sidebar
171)
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
307
This paper examines the compliance of Spanish crime reporting with the principles of the 2016 EU Directive on presumption of innocence, which aims at preventing the publication of information that might bias the public and the jurors against the suspect. A content analysis applied to a sample of 200 crime news stories published by eleven of the most popular print and online news platforms in 2018 reveals that the Spanish press coverage of crime is centered around the pre-trial and sentence stages, with little attention to the oral trial. The full name and the face portrait of the suspect appear in roughly one-third of the stories, but this overwhelmingly happens in news stories reporting on the court’s decision, so that the presumption of innocence is generally protected. Interestingly, the legacy media are more likely to report on the victim’s full name and the crime details that online digital media. One-fourth of the stories include accusations of guilt, as prosecutor attorneys and other officials are more frequently cited than defense lawyers. Although the Spanish press is largely compliant with the recommendations of the EU Directive, the lack of attention to the oral phase, where the arguments of both parts are deployed and contrasted, leads to a bias in the coverage against the suspect.
Keywords
References
Armentia Vizuete, J. I., Marín Murillo, F. & Caminos Marcet, J. M. (2015). Los homicidios en la prensa vasca (2002-2012): tratamiento informativo y códigos deontológicos. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 21(1), 53-72. https://www.doi.org/10.5209/rev_ESMP.2015.v21.n1.49080
Asociación para la Investigación de Medios de Comunicación (2018). Resumen general de resultados (febrero a noviembre 2018). Retrieved from https://www.aimc.es/a1mc-c0nt3nt/uploads/2018/11/resumegm318.pdf
Barata, F. (2009). La devaluación de la presunción de inocencia en el periodismo. Anàlisi, 39, 217-236.
Barata, F. (2003). Los mass media y la información criminal: el ‘caso King’ y las perversiones mediáticas. Quaderns del CAC, 17, 49-55.
Barrero Ortega, A. (2010). Juicios por la prensa y ordenamiento constitucional. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
Del Moral, A. (2008). Derecho a un juicio público, libertad de información y derechos al honor y a la vida privada: relaciones, conflictos, interferencias. Persona y Derecho, 59, 253-293. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10171/17360
Dixon, T. L. & Linz, D. (2002). Television news, prejudicial pretrial publicity, and the depiction of race. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(1), 112–136. https://www.doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4601_7
Imrich, D. J., Mullin, C. & Linz, D. (1995). Measuring the extent of prejudicial pretrial publicity in major American newspapers: A content analysis. Journal of Communication, 45(3), 94–118. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1995.tb00745.x
Linz, D. & Penrod S. (1992) Exploring the First and Sixth Amendments: Pretrial publicity and jury decision making. In D. K. Kagehiro & W. S. Laufer (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology and Law (pp. 3-20). New York: Springer. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4038-7_1
Maciá Barber, C. (2010). El quehacer periodístico ante la presunción de inocencia. In S. Alsius & F. Salgado (Eds.), La ética informativa vista por los ciudadanos: contraste de opiniones entre los periodistas y el público (pp. 107-123). Barcelona: UOC.
Maciá Barber, C. & Galván-Arias, M. A. (2012). Presumption of innocence and journalistic ethics: the Aitana case. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 67, 356-387. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2012-960en
Montalvo Abiol, J. C. (2012). Los juicios paralelos en el proceso penal: ¿anomalía democrática o mal necesario? Universitas, Revista de Filosofía, Derecho y Política, 16, 105-125. Retrived from http://hdl.handle.net/10016/15200
Navarro Marchante, V. J. (2007). Las imágenes de los juicios: aproximación a la realidad en España. InDret, Revista para el Análisis del Derecho, 3, 1-28.
Nieva Fenoll, J. (2016). La razón de ser de la presunción de inocencia. InDret, Revista para el Análisis del Derecho, 1, 1-23.
Ogloff, J. P. & Vidmar, N. (1994). The impact of pretrial publicity on jurors: A study to compare the relative effects of television and print media in a child sex abuse case. Law and Human Behavior, 5, 507-525. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/BF01499171
Palmer, R. (2017). Becoming the news: How ordinary people respond to the media spotlight. New York: Columbia University Press.
Patterson, M. J., Smith Fullerton, R. & Tuñón Navarro, J. (2016). At a crossroads or caught in the crossfire? Crime coverage concerns for democracy in Portugal, Spain, and Italy. Journalism Practice, 11(9), 1-22. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2016.1234944
Puebla Martínez, B. & Lozano Vizcarro, V. (2014). Periodismo jurídico: el tratamiento informativo en prensa del caso ‘Marta del Castillo’ en los diarios El País y El Mundo. Fonseca: Journal of Communication, 8, 35-69. Retrieved from https://revistas.usal.es/index.php/2172-9077/article/view/11811
Redondo García, M. (2013). El sensacionalismo y su penetración en la prensa española de calidad: el ‘caso McCann’ en El País, El Mundo y ABC. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 19(1), 235-253. https://www.doi.org/10.5209/rev_ESMP.2013.v19.n1.42519
Riffe, D., Aust, C. & Lacy, S. (1993). The effectiveness of random, consecutive day and constructed week sampling in newspaper content analysis. Journalism Quarterly, 70, 133-139. https://www.doi.org/10.1177%2F107769909307000115
Rodríguez Gómez, E. F. (2014). El Tribunal Constitucional y el conflicto entre la libertad de información y los derechos al honor, la intimidad y la propia imagen: revisión jurisprudencial. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 20(2), 1209-1224. https://www.doi.org/10.5209/rev_ESMP.2014.v20.n2.47061
Rosell, S. (2020). Una forta abraçada. Barcelona: Rosa dels Vents.
Smith Fullerton, R. & Patterson, M. J. (2013). Crime news and privacy: Comparing crime reporting in Sweden, the Netherlands and England. In R. Picard & J. Petley (Eds.), Media and the boundaries of disclosure: Media, morals and public shaming (pp. 115-143). London: I. B. Tauris & Reuters Institute, Oxford University.
Smith Fullerton, R. & Patterson, M. J. (2016a). Not naming names? Crime coverage rituals in Canada, Sweden, and the Netherlands. In C. Richardson & R. Smith Fullerton (Eds.), Covering Canadian crime: What journalists should know and the public should question, (pp. 304–321). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Smith Fullerton, R., & Patterson, M. J. (2016b). Telling tales in the shadow of giants: Canada, Ireland, and the ethics of crime coverage. Journal of Media Ethics, 31(23), 174–187. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2016.1188010
Steblay, N. M., Besirevic, J., Fulero, S. M. & Jiménez-Lorente, B. (1999). The effects of pretrial publicity on juror verdicts: A meta-analytic review. Law and Human Behavior, 23(2), 219-235. https://www.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022325019080
Vázquez Miraz, P. (2019). El tratamiento de la presunción de inocencia de un parricida en las primeras crónicas informativas de la prensa española. Revista de Antropología y Sociología: VIRAJES, 21(1), 181-195. https://www.doi.org/10.17151/rasv.2019.21.1.8
Villanueva Turnes, A. (2015). La presunción de inocencia: una aproximación actual al derecho. Revista Catalana de Dret Públic, 51, 209-222. https://www.doi.org/10.2436/20.8030.01.62.
Wardle, C. (2008). Crime reporting. The International Encyclopedia of Communication. New York: John Wiley & Sons. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecc155
Metrics
|
|
Details
Article Details
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.
