Eva Diniz e-mail(Login required) , Rita Sepúlveda e-mail(Login required)

Main Article Content

Authors

Eva Diniz e-mail(Login required)
Rita Sepúlveda e-mail(Login required)

Abstract

211

This article aims to analyze how fatherhood is performed on Instagram by examining the domains of involvement. Parental roles and behaviors have changed in the last years and are currently a relevant social and scientific topic. The way that fatherhood is performed is also a frequent subject on social media, spreading the ideal of a new fatherhood and portraying the father as committed to childcare duties. The hashtag “fatherhood” was used to identify posts on Instagram representing father involvement. A final sample of 121 posts was identified. Results depicted three main domains in fatherhood’s online representations of involvement: (1) child caregiving; (2) fathers as a source of the child’s affection; and (3) fathers involved in play, committed to the child’s interests and offering new opportunities of stimulation. The display of fatherhood as a role requiring dedication and effort also emerged, but to a lesser extent. Nevertheless, only positive emotions were shared, depicting pleasure in the performed role, and communicating an ideal and self-enhancing profile. Moreover, posts seemed to disseminate an ideal of fatherhood rather than raise questions or discuss the challenges related to it. Findings uncover how media social representations of fatherhood are still an unfinished process, failing to capture diversity and challenges in contemporary families.

Keywords

Fatherhood, father involvement, Instagram, digital expression, hashtag

References

Ammari, T. & Schoenebeck, S. (2015). Understanding and supporting fathers and fatherhood on Social Media sites. In proceeds of CHI 2015 Families and Their use of Technology (pp. 1905-1914). https://www.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702205

Ammari, T. & Schoenebeck, S. (2016). “Thanks for your interest in our Facebook group, but it’s only for dads:” Social Roles of Stay-at-Home Dads. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 1363–1375). https://www.doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819927

Ammari, T., Schoenebeck, S. & Romero, D. (2018). Pseudonymous parents: Comparing parenting roles and identities on the Mommit and Daddit Subreddits. In Proceedings of the CHI 2018 (pp. 1-13). https://www.doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174063

Andreasson, J. & Johansson, T. (2016). Global narratives of fatherhood. Fathering and masculinity on the Internet. International Review of Sociology, 26, 482-496. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2016.1191245

Barker, B., Iles, J. E. & Ramchandani, P. G. (2017). Fathers, fathering and child psychopathology. Current Opinion in Psychology, 15, 87‐92. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.02.015

Berkowitz, D. (2011). Maternal Instincts, Biological Clocks, and Soccer Moms: Gay Men’s Parenting and Family Narratives. Symbolic Interaction, 34, 514-535. https://www.doi.org/10.1525/si.2011.34.4.514

Cabrera, N. J., Tamis-LeMonda, C., Bradley, R. H., Hofferth, S. & Lamb, M. E. (2000). Fatherhood in the Twenty-First Century. Child Development, 71, 127-136. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00126

Cabrera, N. J., Fitzgerald, H. E., Bradley, R. H. & Roggman, L. (2014). The ecology of father–child relationships: An expanded model. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 6, 336-354. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12054

Cabrera, N., Volling, B. & Barr, R. (2018). Fathers are Parents, too! Widening the lens on parenting for children’s development. Child Development Perspectives. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12275

Collett, J. L., Vercel, K. & Boykin, O. (2015). Using Identity Processes to Understand Persistent Inequality in Parenting. Social Psychology Quarterly, 78, 345-364. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0190272515607493

Collier, R. & Sheldon, S. (2008). Fragmenting Fatherhood. A Socio-Legal Study. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Dermott, E. & Miller, T. (2015). More than the sum of its parts? Contemporary fatherhood policy, practice and discourse. Families, Relationships, & Societies, 4, 183-195. https://www.doi.org/10.1332/204674315X14212269138324

Doucet, A. & Lee, R. (2014). Fathering, Feminism(s), Gender, and Sexualities: Connections, Tensions, and New Pathways. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 6, 355-373. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12051

Fiesler, C. & Proferes. N. (2018). “Participant” perceptions of Twitter research ethics. Social Media + Society, 4, 1-14. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/2056305118763366

Fletcher, R. & StGeorge, J. (2011). Heading Into Fatherhood—Nervously: Support for Fathering from Online Dads. Qualitative Health Research, 21, 1101–1114. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1049732311404903

Frank, S. (1998). Life with Father: Parenthood and Masculinity in the Nineteenth-Century American North. London: The John Hopkins University Press.

Gibson, L. & Hanson, V. L. (2013). Digital motherhood: How Does Technology Help New Mothers? In CHI’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 313-322).

Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.

Gregory, A. & Milner, S. (2011). What is “New” about Fatherhood? The social construction of fatherhood in France and the UK. Men & Masculinities, 14, 588-606. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1097184X11412940

Henz, U. (2019). Fathers’ involvement with their children in the United Kingdom: Recent trends and class differences. Demographic Research, 40, 865-896. https://www.doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2019.40.30

Hofferth, S. L. & Goldscheider, F. (2010). Family structure and the transition to early parenthood. Demography, 47, 415-37. https://www.doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0102.

Hu, Y., Manikonda, L. & Kambhampati, S. (2014) What we Instagram: A first analysis of Instagram photo content and user types. Proceedings of the 8th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 595-598). Ann Arbor, MI, 1–4 June.

Jorge, A. (2019). Social Media, Interrupted: Users recounting temporary disconnection on Instagram. Social Media + Society, 1-19. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/2056305119881691

Kelly, J. & Tropp, L. (2016). Introduction: Changing Conceptions of the Good Dad in Popular Culture. In L. Tropp & J. Kelly (Eds.), Deconstructing Dads: Changing Images of Fathers in Popular Cultur (pp. xi-xx). MD: Lexington Books.

Kroll, M. E., Carson, C., Redshaw, M. & Quigley, M. A. (2016). Early father involvement and subsequent child behaviour at ages 3, 5 and 7 years: Prospective analysis of the UK Millennium Cohort Study. PLoS One, 11. https://www.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162339

Kumar, P. & Schoenebeck, S. (2015). The modern-day baby book: Enacting good mothering and stewarding privacy on Facebook. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW ‘15) (pp. 1302-1312). https://www.doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675149.

Laestadius, L. (2017). Instagram. In L. Sloan & A. Quan-Haase (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Media Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Lamb, M. E., Pleck, J. H., Charnov, E. L. & Levine, J. A. (1987). A biosocial perspective on paternal behavior and involvement. In J. B. Lancaster, J. Altmann, A. S. Rossi & L. R. Sherrod (Eds.), Parenting across the life span: Biosocial dimensions (pp. 111–142). Hawthorn, NY: Aldine.

Lamb, M. E. (2004). The Role of the Father in Child Development. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Lamb, M. E. & Tamis-LeMonda, C. S. (2004). The role of the father: An introduction. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (pp. 1-31). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Leaver, T., Highfield, T. & Abidin, C. (2020). Instagram: Visual Social Media Cultures. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Locatelli, E. (2017). Images of breastfeeding on Instagram: Self-representation, publicness, and privacy management. Social Media + Society, 3, 1–14. https://www.doi.org/2056305117707190

Lupton, D. & Barclay, L. (1997). Constructing Fatherhood: Discourses and Experiences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Markham A. & Buchanan, E. (2012). Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research. Recommendations from the Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR) Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0). Retrieved from https://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf

Marsiglio, W., Roy, K. & Fox, G. L. (2005). Situated Fathering: A Focus on Physical and Social Spaces. Maryland, BA, US: Rowman & Littlefield.

Mercer, G. D., Jewkes, R., Esser, M., MacNab, Y. C., Patrick, D. M., Buxton, J. A. & Bettinger, J. A. (2018). Exploring low levels of inter-parental agreement over South African fathers’ parenting practices. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 26, 20–39. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1060826517711160

Milkie, M. A. & Denny, K. E. (2014). Changes in the cultural model of father involvement: Descriptions of benefits to fathers, children, and mothers in Parents’ Magazine, 1926-2006. Journal of Family Issues, 35, 223-253. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0192513X12462566

Moignan, E., Lawson, S., Rowland, D., Mahoney, J. & Briggs, P. (2017). Has Instagram fundamentally altered the ‘Family Snapshot’? In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 4935-4948). https://www.doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025928

Monteiro, L., Fernandes, M., Torres, C. & Santos, C. (2017). Father’s involvement and parenting styles in Portuguese families. The role of education and working hours. Análise Psicológica, 4, 513-528. https://www.doi.org/10.14417/ap.1451

Morris, M. R. (2014). Social Networking Site Use by Mothers of Young Children. In Proceeds of CSCW ‘14 (pp. 1272-1282).

Nurhantoro, T. & Wulandari, N. (2017). Exploring the use of English in Instagram and its influence on the user’s identity. Journal of English Language and Education, 3, 37-43.

Omnicore (2020, February 10). Instagram by the Numbers: Stats, Demographics & Fun Facts. Retrieved from https://www.omnicoreagency.com/instagram-statistics

Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A Private sphere. Democracy in a digital age. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

Planalp, E. M. & Braungart-Rieker, J. M. (2013). Temperamental precursors of infant attachment with mothers and fathers. Infant Behavior & Development, 36, 796‐808. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.09.004

Plantin, L. (2018) Fathering, masculinity and the embodiment of care. Community, Work & Family, 21, 243-245. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2016.1248274

Pleck, J. H. (2010). Paternal involvement: Revised conceptualization and theoretical linkages with child outcomes. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The Role of the Father in Child Development (pp. 58-93). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Pleck, J. H. & Masciadrelli, B. P. (2004). Paternal involvement by U.S. residential fathers: Levels, sources, and consequences. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The Role of the Father in Child Development (pp. 222-271). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Ranson, G. (2015). Fathering, Masculinity, and the Embodiment of Care. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Rose, G. (2001). Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Rowland, J. & Correia, R. (2018a). Involved fatherhood on Instagram: A qualitative exploratory analysis. Oral presentation on Instagram Conference, Middlesex University London. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/jussararowland/involved-fatherhood-on-instagram-a-qualitative-exploratory-analysis-of-instadads-visual-narratives

Rowland, J. & Correia, R. (2018b). Images of caring masculinities: Fatherhood and childcare. Life Research Group Blog, ICS-Lisboa. Retrieved from https://liferesearchgroup.wordpress.com/2018/10/02

Salzmann-Erikson, M. & Eriksson, H. (2013). Fathers sharing about early parental support in health-care -virtual discussions on an Internet forum. Health & Social Care in the Community, 21, 381-390. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12028

Scharrer, E. L. (2012). Representations of Gender in the Media. In K. E. Dill (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Media Psychology (pp. 267-283). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Scheibling, C. (2019). Doing Fatherhood Online: Men’s Parental Identities, Experiences, and Ideologies on Social Media. Symbolic Interaction, 43, 472-492. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/SYMB.459

Seko, Y. & Tiidenberg, K. (2016). Birth through the Digital Womb: Visualizing prenatal life online. In P. G. Nixon, R. Rawal & A. Funk (Eds.), Digital Media Across the Lifecourse (pp. 50-66). Surrey, UK: Ashgate.

Serafinelli, E. (2017). Digital life on Instagram. New social communication of photography. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.

Tiidenberg, K. & Baym, N. K. (2017). Learn it, buy it, work it: Intensive pregnancy on Instagram. Social Media + Society, 3, 1-13. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/2056305116685108

Toma, C. & Hancock, J. (2013). Self-Affirmation Underlies Facebook Use. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(3), 321-331. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0146167212474694

World Health Organization. (2007). Fatherhood and health outcomes in Europe. Retrieved from https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/69011/E91129.pdf

Zappavigna, M. (2016). Social media photography: Construing subjectivity in Instagram images. Visual Communication 15, 271-292. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1470357216643220

Metrics

Search GoogleScholar


Details

Article Details

Section
Articles