Alternative news on social media in Norway
Article Sidebar
70)
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
152
Alternative news media in Norway have become visible in public debates. Partly because of news sharing on social media. Social media has become an arena for news, information, and public debate, and has also become a place to fight for the news agenda. The present study examines news sharing in social media in Norway and how right-wing alternative news outlets use social media to impact the news agenda. These are small organizations with only a handful of employees, but they have very proactive readers and feature a considerable amount of user-generated content. They are critical of immigration, particularly from Muslim countries, and of the political elite. They mimic traditional media in the way they organize and label their content, but their reporting is more subjective. The present study uses quantitative content analysis to reveal which topics are the most shared on social media, and from which news type of news organizations they come. It also looks at how news sharing differed in the days following a series of terrorist attacks and how the pattern changed during the course of a normal day. This leads to a discussion on participatory journalism and how news sharing can be seen as a part of the public debate.
Keywords
References
Almgren, S. M. & Olsson, T. (2016). Commenting, sharing and tweeting news. Nordicom Review, 37(2), 67-81. https://www.doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0018
Atton, C. & Hamilton, J. F. (2008). Alternative journalism. London: SAGE. https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781446216163
Balmer, A. S., Calvert, J., Marris, C., Molyneux-Hodgson, S., Frow, E., Kearnes, M. & Martin, P. (2015). Taking roles in interdisciplinary collaborations: reflections on working in post-ELSI spaces in the UK synthetic biology community. Science and Technology Studies, 28(3), 3-25. https://www.doi.org/10.23987/sts.55340
Barnidge, M. (2015). The role of news in promoting political disagreement on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 211-218. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.011
Barnidge, M., Huber, B., de Zúñiga, H. G. & Liu, J. H. (2018). Social media as a sphere for “risky” political expression: a twenty-country multilevel comparative analysis. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(2), 161-182. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1940161218773838
Bastos, M. T. (2015). Shares Pins and Tweets. Journalism Studies, 16(3), 305-325. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.891857
Bergström, A. & Belfrage, M. J. (2018). News in social media. Digital Journalism, 6(5), 583-598. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1423625
Bergström, A. & Wadbring, I. (2015). Beneficial yet crappy: journalists and audiences on obstacles and opportunities in reader comments. European Journal of Communication, 30(2), 137-151. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0267323114559378
Boczkowski, P. J. & Mitchelstein, E. (2012). How users take advantage of different forms of interactivity on online news sites: clicking, e-mailing, and commenting. Human Communication Research, 38, 1-22. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01418.x
Bode, L. (2016). Political news in the news feed: learning politics from social media. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 24-48. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1045149
Borger, M., van Hoof, A., Costera Meijer, I. & Sanders, J. (2013). Constructing participatory journalism as a scholarly object. Digital Journalism, 1(1), 117-134. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2012.740267
Boulianne, S. (2016). Online news, civic awareness, and engagement in civic and political life. New Media & Society, 18(9), 1840-1856. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1461444815616222
Brandtzaeg, P. B., Heim, J. & Karahasanovic, A. (2011). Understanding the new digital divide a typology of Internet users in Europe. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69, 123-138. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.11.004
Brandtzæg, P. B. (2012). Social networking sites: their users and social implications a longitudinal study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 467-488. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01580.x
Bright, J. (2016). The social news gap: how news reading and news sharing diverge. Journal of Comunication, 66(3), 343-365. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12232
Bro, P. & Wallberg, F. (2015). Gatekeeping in a Digital Era. Journalism Practice, 9(1), 92-105. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.928468
Bruns, A. (2005). Gate-watching: collaborative online news production. New York: Peter Lang.
Bruns, A. (2016). Random Acts of Journalism Redux. News and social media. In J. L. Jensen, M. Mortensen & J. Ørmen (Eds.), News across media: production, distribution and consumption (pp. 32-47). New York: Routledge.
Cohen, B. (1963). The press and foreign policy. New York: Harcourt.
Cushion, S., McDowell-Naylor, D. & Thomas, R. (2021). Why national media systems matter: a longitudinal analysis of how uk left-wing and right-wing alternative media critique mainstream media (2015-2018). Journalism Studies, 22(5), 633-652. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1893795
DeSilver, D. (2014). Facebook is a news source for many, but only incidentally. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/02/04/facebook-is-a-news-source-for-many-but-only-incidentally/
Feezell, J. T. (2017). Agenda setting through social media: the importance of incidental news exposure and social filtering in the digital era. Political Research Quarterly, 71(2), 482-494. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1065912917744895
Haller, A. & Holt, K. (2019). Paradoxical populism: how PEGIDA relates to mainstream and alternative media. Information, Communication & Society, 22(12), 1665-1680. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1449882
Hermida, A., Fletcher, F., Korell, D. & Logan, D. (2012). Share, like, recommend. Journalism Studies, 13(5-6), 815-824. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2012.664430
Hermida, A. & Thurman, N. (2008). A clash of cultures. Journalism Practice, 2(3), 343-356. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/21670811. 2013.808456
Holt, K. & Karlsson, M. (2015). Random acts of journalism?: How citizen journalists tell the news in Sweden. New Media & society, 17(11), 1795–1810. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1461444814535189
Ihlebæk, K. A. & Holter, C. R. (2021). Hostile emotions: an exploratory study of far-right online commenters and their emotional connection to traditional and alternative news media. Journalism, 22(5), 1207-1222. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1464884920985726
Ihlebæk, K. A. & Krumsvik, A. H. (2015). Editorial power and public participation in online newspapers. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 16(4), 470-487. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1464884913520200
Iyengar, S. & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19-39. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
Jensen, J. L. (2016). The social sharing of news. Gatekeeping and opinion leadership on Twitter. In J. L. Jensen, M. Mortensen & J. Ørmen (Eds.), News across media: production, distribution and consumption (pp 142-161.). New York: Routledge.
Kalsnes, B. & Larsson, A. O. (2017). Understanding news sharing across social media. Journalism Studies, 19(11), 1669-1688. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2017.1297686
Kalsnes, B. & Larsson, A. O. (2021). Facebook news use during the 2017 Norwegian elections – assessing the influence of hyperpartisan news. Journalism Practice, 15(2), 209-225. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1704426
Kammer, A. (2013). Audience participation in the production of online news. Towards a typology. Nordicom Review, 34 (special issue), 126.
Karlsen, R. (2015). Followers are opinion leaders: the role of people in the flow of political communication on and beyond social networking sites. European Journal of Communication, 30(3), 301-318. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0267323115577305
Karlsson, M., Bergström, A., Clerwall, C. & Fast, K. (2015). Participatory journalism the (r)evolution that wasn’t. Content and user behavior in Sweden 2007-2013. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(3), 295-311. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12115
Katz, E. & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence. Glencoe: The Free Press.
Khuntia, J., Sun, H. & Yim, D. (2016). Sharing news through social networks. International Journal on Media Management, 18(1), 59-74. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2016.1185429
Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2015). Choice and preference in media use. Advances in selective exposure theory and research. New York: Routledge.
Krumsvik, A. H. (2018). Redefining user involvement in digital news media. Journalism Practice, 12(1), 19-31. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2017.1279025
Ksiazek, T. B., Peer, L. & Lessard, K. (2016). User engagement with online news: conceptualizing interactivity and exploring the relationship between online news videos and user comments. New Media & Society, 18(3), 502-520. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1461444814545073
Kümpel, A. S., Karnowski, V. & Keyling, T. (2015). News Sharing in social media: a review of current research on news sharing users, content, and networks. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 1-14. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/2056305115610141
Larsson, A. O. (2016a). I shared the news today, oh boy. Journalism Studies, 19(1), 43-61. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2016.1154797
Larsson, A. O. (2016b). In it for the long run? Journalism Practice, 11(4), 438-457. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1121787
Larsson, A. O. (2019). News use as amplification: Norwegian national, regional, and hyperpartisan media on Facebook. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(3), 721-741. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1077699019831439
Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
Ma, L., Lee, C. S. & Goh, D. H.-L. (2014). Understanding news sharing in social media: an explanation from the diffusion of innovation theory. Online Information Review, 38(5), 598-615. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/OIR-10-2013-023a
Mayerhöffer, E. (2021). How do Danish right-wing alternative media position themselves against the mainstream? Advancing the study of alternative media structure and content. Journalism Studies, 22(2), 119-136. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1814846
McCombs, M. (2005). A look at agenda-setting: past, present and future. Journalism Studies, 6(4), 543-557. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/14616700500250438
Messing, S. & Westwood, S. J. (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media. Communication Research, 41(8), 1042-1063. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0093650212466406
Nielsen, R. K. & Schrøder, K. C. (2014). The relative importance of social media for accessing, finding, and engaging with news. Digital Journalism, 2(4), 472-489. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2013.872420
Nygaard, S. (2019). The appearance of objectivity: how immigration-critical alternative media report the news. Journalism Practice, 1-17. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1577697
Näsi, A. (2015). The reader’s image: amateur photographs in the finnish newspaper. In R. Brusila, A.-K. Juntti-Henriksson & H. Vanhan (Eds.), Integrated media change (pp. 111-132). Rovaniemi: Lapland University Press.
Oeldorf-Hirsch, A. & Sundar, S. S. (2015). Posting, commenting, and tagging: effects of sharing news stories on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 240-249. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.024
Pantti, M. & Bakker, P. (2009). Misfortunes, memories and sunsets. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 12(5), 471-489. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1367877909337860
Sakariassen, H., Hovden, J. F. & Moe, H. (2017). Bruksmønstre for digitale nyheter. Reuters Insitute Digital News Report, Norge 2017. Retrieved from https://frittord.no/attachments/97dffa1a2c3f055d36680c8ecf9f0be42bd951e2/70-20191220154134657983.pdf
Schwarz, J. A. & Hammarlund, J. (2016). Kontextförlust och kontextkollaps. Metodproblem vid innehållsanalys av sociala medier. Nordicom - Information, 38(3), 41-55.
Singer, J. B. (2014). User-generated visibility: Secondary gatekeeping in a shared media space. New Media & Society, 16(1), 55-73. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1461444813477833
Tandoc, E. C., Jenkins, J. & Craft, S. (2019). Fake news as a critical incident in journalism. Journalism Practice, 13(6), 673-689. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2018.1562958
Thorson, K. & Wells, C. (2016). Curated flows: a framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Communication Theory, 26(3), 309-328. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/comt.12087
Toff, B. & Nielsen, R. K. (2018). “I just Google it”: folk theories of distributed discovery. Journal of Communication, 68(3), 636-657. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy009
Wadbring, I. & Ödmark, S. (2016). Going viral: news sharing and shared news in social media. Observatorio, 10(4), 132-149.
Wold, T. (2020). Har du delt nyhetene i dag? [Have you shared the news today?]. Norsk medietidsskrift, 27. Retrieved from https://www.idunn.no/nmt/2020/01/har_du_delt_nyhetene_i_dag
Metrics
|
|
Details
Article Details
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.
