Strategy and creativity in the use of political slogans: A study of the elections held in Spain in 2019
Article Sidebar
247)
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
271
The unquestionable predominance of slogans in political communication versus their declining relevance in the commercial kind underpins the objective of this study, which is to gain further insight into the strategies and creative discourses employed by political parties in their campaigning before the general, regional and local elections held in Spain in 2019, whereby the results are compared with those obtained in previous research. The aim is thus to determine the attributes of electoral slogans regarding such aspects as their semantic density, complexity, use of rhetorical devices, core focus or communication efficiency. Accordingly, this study is framed in the field of research on political advertising, employing content analysis. To this end, an analysis was performed on an extensive corpus of 197 slogans, selected according to the criteria of comprehensiveness, relevance and representativeness. In short, it can be claimed that the tendencies noted in previous studies have stabilized, albeit with some new developments in relation to briefness, the use of double or triple slogans, expressive focus, bilingualism, the use of visual resources (such as emoticons) or digital language (contractions), the presence of rhetorical devices, and the relevance of voters and candidates versus political parties, among other factors. Besides the specific evolution of their formal and content-related aspects, we argue that the relevance of political slogans still prevails, and rather than undermining their essence and uses, the advent of social media has instead enhanced them.
Keywords
References
Adam, J. M. & Bonhomme, M. (2000). La argumentación publicitaria. Madrid: Cátedra.
Amado, A. (2016). Política pop: De líderes populistas a telepresidentes. Buenos Aires: Ariel.
Ardèvol-Abreu, A. & Gil de Zúniga, H. (2020). “Obstinate partisanship”: Political discussion attributes effects on the development of unconditional party loyalty. International Journal of Communication, 14, 324-345. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/12464
Bastos, M. T. Raimundo, R. L. & Travitzki, R. (2013). Gatekeeping Twitter: message diffusion in political hashtags. Media, Culture and Society, 35(2), 260-270. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0163443712467594
Bennet, W. L. & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122-139. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317
Bimber, B. (2014). Digital media in the Obama campaigns of 2008 and 2012: Adaptation to the personalized political communication environment. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(2), 130-150. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.895691
Block, E. & Negrine, R. (2017). The populist communication style: toward a critical framework. International Journal of Communication, 11, 178-197. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5820
Boerman, S. C. & Kruikemeier, S. (2016). Consumer responses to promoted tweets sent by brands and political parties. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 285-294. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.033
Bossetta, M. (2018). The digital architectures of social media: Comparing political campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 US election. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(2), 471-496. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1077699018763307
Campos-Domínguez, E. & García-Orosa, B. (2018). Comunicación algorítmica en los partidos políticos: automatización de producción y circulación de mensajes. Profesional de la Información, 27(4), 769-777. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.jul.06
Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chan, R. (2000). The effectiveness of environmental advertising: the role of claim type and the source country green image. International Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 349-375. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2000.11104806
Cwalina, W., Falkowski, A. & Newman, B. I. (2011). Political Marketing: Theoretical and Strategic Foundations. New York: Routledge. https://www.doi.org/10.4324/9781315701684
Curto, V., Fuentes, J. & Sabaté, J. (2008). Redacción publicitaria. Barcelona: UOC.
Díez de Castro, E. & Galán, J. L. (1988). Análisis del slogan publicitario español. Revista de Economía y Empresa, VIII(22). Retrieved from https://idus.us.es/handle/11441/78228
D’heer, E. & Verdegem, P. (2014). Conversations about the elections on Twitter: Towards a structural understanding of Twitter’s relation with the political and the media field. European Journal of Communication, 29(6), 720-734. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0267323114544866
Dimitrova, D. V. & Matthes, J. (2018). Social media in political campaigning around the world: Theoretical and methodological challenges. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(2), 333-342. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1077699018770437
Dubois, E. & Blank, G. (2018). The echo chamber is overstated: The moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, Communication & Society, 21(5), 729-745. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656
Eguizábal, R. (2007). Teoría de la publicidad. Madrid: Cátedra.
Eguizábal, R. (2018). Estudio del eslogan. Funciones, retórica y literalidad. Pensar la Publicidad, 12, 127-144. https://www.doi.org/10.5209/PEPU.60925
Evans, H. K. & Clark, J. H. (2016). “You tweet like a girl!”: How female candidates campaign on Twitter. American Politics Research, 44(2), 326-352. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X15597747
Fletcher, R. & Nielsen, R. K. (2018). Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2450-2468. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1461444817724170
Fuchs, C. (2017). Social media: A critical introduction. London: Sage. https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781446270066
Garrido, M. (2000). El eslogan del año 2000. Questiones Publicitarias, 1(8), 68-87. Retrieved from https://raco.cat/index.php/questionespublicitarias/article/view/v8-garrido
Garrido, M. & Ramos, M. (2006). La evolución del eslogan en la publicidad gráfica española. Trípodos, Extra, 183-193. Retrieved from https://idus.us.es/handle/11441/28145
Garrido, M., Rey, J. & Ramos. M. (2012). Evolución y desarrollo del eslogan publicitario: tercer análisis. Pensar la Publicidad, 6(2), 407-426. https://www.doi.org/10.5209/rev_PEPU.2012.v6.n2.41242
Garrido, M. (2013). Estudio comparativo de los eslóganes comerciales y electorales: el caso de las elecciones generales españolas de 2008. Convergencia. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 61, 173-192. Retrieved from https://convergencia.uaemex.mx/article/view/1054
Gerbaudo, P. (2018). Social media and populism: an elective affinity? Media, Culture & Society, 40(5), 745-753. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0163443718772192
Hallin, D. C. & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hartig, F. (2018). Political slogans as instruments of international government communication – the case of China. The Journal of International Communication, 24(1), 115-137. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2018.1444664
Hernández, R. (2007). Claims: entre la inspiración y el método. Anuncios, 1.201, 18-20. Retrieved from https://www.anuncios.com/2007/07/17/claims-entre-la-inspiracion-y-el-metodo/
Holt, K., Shehata, A., Strömbäck, J. & Ljungberg, E. (2013). Age and the effects of news media attention and social media use on political interest and participation: Do social media function as leveller? European Journal of Communication, 28(1), 19-34. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0267323112465369
Jungherr, A. (2015). Analyzing political communication with digital trace data. New York: Springer. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20319-5
Karlsen, R. & Enjolras, B. (2016). Styles of social media campaigning and influence in a hybrid political communication system: Linking candidate survey data with Twitter data. International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 338-357. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1940161216645335
Keane, J. (2013). Democracy and media decadence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107300767
Kemp, E., Bui, M. & Chapa, C. (2012). The role of advertising in consumer emotion management. International Journal of Advertising, 31(2), 339-353. https://www.doi.org/10.2501/IJA-31-2-339-353
Krippendorff, K. (2004 [1990]). Content Analysis: And Introduction to Its Methodology (2nd Ed.). London: Sage.
Kreiss, D., Lawrence, R. G. & McGregor, S. C. (2018). In their own words: Political practitioner accounts of candidates, audiences, affordances, genres, and timing in strategic social media use. Political Communication, 35(1), 8-31. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1334727
Kruikemeier, S., van Noort, G., Vliegenhart, R. & de Vreese, C. H. (2013). Getting closer: The effects of personalized and interactive online political communication. European Journal of Communication, 28(1), 53-66. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0267323112464837
Larsson, A. O. & Ihlen, Ø. (2015). Birds of a feather flock together? Party leaders on Twitter during the 2013 Norwegian elections. European Journal of Communication, 30(6), 666-681. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0267323115595525
Loader, B. D. & Mercea, D. (2012). Social media and democracy: Innovations in participatory politics. London: Routledge. https://www.doi.org/10.4324/9780203126974
López-García, G. (2016). New vs ‘old’ leaderships: The campaign of Spanish general elections 2015 on Twitter. Communication and Society, 29(3), 149-168. https://www.doi.org/10.15581/003.29.3.149-168
Mazzoleni, G. & Sfardini, A. (2009). Politica pop. Da ‘Porta Porta’ a ‘L’isola dei famosi’. Bologna: Collata Contemporanea Il Mulino.
McAllister, I. (2007). The personalization of politics. In R. Dalton & H. D. Klingemann (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behaviour (pp. 571-588). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.003.0030
Morales, E. (2016). Metáforas para el cambio social. Discurso y Sociedad, 10(4), 781-807.
Muñiz, J. A. (2005). El papel del eslogan en la actitud hacia la marca. Una tentativa de estudio experimental. Questiones Publicitarias, 10, 119-142. Retrieved from https://raco.cat/index.php/questionespublicitarias/article/view/v10-muniz
Ociepka, B. (2018). Public diplomacy as political communication: Lessons from case studies. European Journal of Communication, 33(3), 290-303. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0267323118763909
Ortega, E., Mora Antón, P. & Rauld Campos, L. (2006). El eslogan en el sector turístico español. Cuadernos de Turismo, 17, 127-146. Retrieved from https://revistas.um.es/turismo/article/view/18051
Pérez-Curiel, C., Rivas-de-Roca, R. & García-Gordillo, M. (2021). Impact of Trump’s Digital Rhetoric on the US Elections: A View from Worldwide Far-Right Populism. Social Sciences, 10(5), 152. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/socsci10050152
Pujante, D. & Morales López, E. (2013). Discurso (discurso político), constructivismo y retórica. Los eslóganes del 15-M. Language, Discourse & Society, 2(2), 32-59.
Quevedo-Redondo, R., Portalés-Oliva, M. & Berrocal-Gonzalo, S. (2016). The image use on Twitter during the 2015 municipal election campaign in Spain. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 71, 85-107. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2016-1085
Rey, J. (1999). Comunicación política electoral. Elecciones municipales en Sevilla en 1999. Sevilla: MAECEI.
Rey, J. (coord.) (2005). Propaganda electoral. Elementos publicitarios y estrategias comunicativas en las elecciones municipales de Sevilla en 2003. Sevilla: Diputación Provincial de Sevilla.
Rivas-de-Roca, R. & García-Gordillo, M. (2020). Thematic Agenda on Twitter in the 2019 European Parliament Elections: A Comparative Study Between ‘Spitzenkandidaten’ and National Candidates. Tripodos, 49, 29-49. https://www.doi.org/10.51698/tripodos.2020.49p29-49
Romano, M. (2021). Creating new discourses for new feminisms: A critical socio-cognitive approach. Language & Communication, 78, 88-99. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2021.02.002
Samuelsen, B. M. & Olsen, L. E. (2010). Promising attributes and experiences. Journal of Advertising, 39(2), 65-77. https://www.doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367390205
Song, C.-M. & Jeon, H.-Y. (2018). A semiotic study of regional branding reflected in the slogans of Korean regions. Social Semiotics, 28(2), 230-256. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1292628
Stier, S., Bleier, A., Lietz, H. & Strohmaier, M. (2018). Election campaigning on social media: Politicians, audiences, and the mediation of political communication on Facebook and Twitter. Political Communication, 35(1), 50-74. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1334728
Strömbäck, J. & Esser, F. (2009). Shaping Politics: Mediatization and Media Interventionism. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization. Concepts, Changes, Consequences (pp. 205-223). New York: Peter Lang.
Stromer-Galley, J. (2014). Presidential campaigning in the Internet age. New York: Oxford University Press. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190694043.001.0001
Tucker, J., Guess, A., Barbera, P., Vaccari, C., Siegel, A., Sanovich, S., Stukal, D. & Nyhan, B. (2018). Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature. Menlo Park: Social Science Research Network. http://www.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3144139
Vaccari, C. & Valeriani, A. (2015). Follow the leader! Direct and indirect flows of political communication during the 2013 Italian general election campaign. New Media & Society, 17(7), 1025-1042. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1461444813511038
Vaes J., Paladino, M. P. & Magagnotti, C. (2011). The Human Message in Politics: The Impact of Emotional Slogans on Subtle Conformity. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151(2), 162-179. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00224540903510829
Valera-Ordaz, L. (2019). Liberal individualist, communitarian, or deliberative? Analyzing political discussion on Facebook based on the three notions of democracy. International Journal of Communication, 13, 1056-1076. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/8309
Van Aelst, P., Sheafer, T. & Stanyer J. (2012). The personalization of mediated political communication: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 203-220. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427802
Van Kessel, S. & Castelein, R. (2016). Shifting the blame. Populist politicians’ use of Twitter as a tool of opposition. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 12(2), 594-614. Retrieved from https://www.jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/709
Verweij, P. (2012). Twitter links between politicians and journalists. Journalism Practice, 6(5-6), 680-691. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2012.667272
Metrics
|
|
Details
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.
