«It’s the context, stupid»: The European Union’s public diplomacy in times of ontological insecurity
Article Sidebar
189)
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
256
Public diplomacy, despite its numerous and varied definitions, is essentially a communications process. By engaging the academic literature of public diplomacy with Lasswell’s model of communication and Braddock’s rearticulation of his model, this paper proposes an integrated framework that allows for the systematization of public diplomacy research. The framework is composed of the independent variable of context, which influences a set of dependent variables: the actors, publics, messages, objectives and tools of public diplomacy. Accordingly, this paper argues that public diplomacy research has been traditionally approached from an agent-centric perspective, and despite its obvious significance, the influence of context has been understudied. In order to test the utility of the model, the paper applies it to the case study of the European Union’s public diplomacy during two different settings. First, it will expose the main characteristics of the EU’s public diplomacy during times of globalization, where the EU’s public diplomacy was characterized by its normativity. Subsequently, the current context of deglobalization and de-europeanization will be introduced and analyzed through the following research question: what happens to the EU’s public diplomacy when the founding myth upon which it is constructed is under threat? By altering the context, one can easily see an emerging but clear transformation of the characteristics of the EU’s public diplomacy. By analyzing official, policy, and legal documents, and engaging with the academic literature on the topic, the paper concludes that the main objective of the EU’s public diplomacy in a changing world should be to provide for ontological security through (emotional) strategic metanarratives.
Keywords
References
Adler, E. & Drieschova, A. (2021). The Epistemological Challenge of Truth Subversion to the Liberal International Order. International Organization, 75(2), 359-386. https://www.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000533
Angell, S. I. & Mordhorst, M. (2015). National Reputation Management and the Competition State: The cases of Denmark and Norway. Journal of Cultural Economy, 8(2), 184-201. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2014.885459
Barbé, E. & Morillas, P. (2019). The EU global strategy: The dynamics of a more politicized and politically integrated foreign policy. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32(6), 753-770. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1588227
Bean, H. & Comor, E. (2017). Data-Driven Public Diplomacy: A Critical and Reflexive Assessment. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, 0, 1-16. https://www.doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.321794
Bødker, H. & Anderson, C. (2019). Populist Time: Mediating Immediacy and Delay in Liberal Democracy. International Journal of Communication, 13, 5948-5966. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/11980/2889
Börzel, T. A. & Zürn, M. (2021). Contestations of the Liberal International Order: From Liberal Multilateralism to Postnational Liberalism. International Organization, 75(2), 282-305. https://www.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000570
Braddock, R. (1958). An Extension of the “Lasswell Formula”. Journal of Communication, 8(2), 88-93. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1958.tb01138.x
Brown, R. (2013). The Politics of Relational Public Diplomacy. In R. S. Zaharna, A. Arsenault & A. Fisher (eds.), Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy (chapter 3). New York: Routledge.
Buarque, D. (2015). One Country, Two Cups—The International Image of Brazil in 1950 and in 2014: A Study of the Reputation and the Identity of Brazil as Projected by the International Media During the Two FIFA World Cups in the Country, International Journal of Communication, 9, 1300-1318. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/3351/1368
Carr, E. H. (1962). The Twenty Years’ Crisis 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. London: MacMillan.
Castells, M. (2008). The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 78-93. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311877
Chang, T.-K. & Lin, F. (2014). From propaganda to public diplomacy: Assessing China’s international practice and its image, 1950-2009. Public Relations Review, 40(3), 450-458. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.04.008
Cox, R. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 126-155. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/03058298810100020501
Cross, M. K. D. (2013). Conceptualizing European Public Diplomacy. In M. K. D. Cross & J. Melissen (Eds.), European Public Diplomacy: Soft Power at Work (pp. 1-11). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cull, N. J. (2006). “Public Diplomacy” Before Gullion: The Evolution of a Phrase. USC Center on Public Diplomacy. Retrieved from https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/public-diplomacy-gullion-evolution-phrase
Cull, N. J. (2009). Public diplomacy: Lessons from the past. Los Angeles: Figueroa Press.
Dodd, M. D. & Collins, S. J. (2017). Public relations message strategies and public diplomacy 2.0: An empirical analysis using Central-Eastern European and Western Embassy Twitter accounts. Public Relations Review, 43(2), 417-425. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.004
Duke, S. (2013). The European External Action Service and Public Diplomacy. In M. K. D. Cross & J. Melissen (Eds.), European Public Diplomacy: Soft Power at Work (pp. 113-136). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
European Commission, Directorate-General for Communication, Juncker, J., State of the Union 2016, Publications Office, 2016. Retrieved from https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2775/968989
European Council (2003). A Secure Europe in a Better World. European Security Strategy. Retrieved from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/documents-publications/publications/european-security-strategy-secure-europe-better-world/
European External Action Service (2022). Public Diplomacy: Building Bridges between the European Union and the rest of the world, Strategic Communications. Retrieved from https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/public-diplomacy_en
European Union (2016). Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/globalstrategy/sites/globalstrategy/files/eugs_review_web.pdf.
Fitzpatrick, K. (2007). Advancing the New Public Diplomacy: A Public Relations Perspective. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 2(3), 187-211. https://www.doi.org/10.1163/187119007X240497
Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York. Free Press.
Gallie, W. B. (1955). Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167-198. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/4544562
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Gilboa, E. (2008). Searching for a Theory of Public Diplomacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 55-77. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0002716207312142
Goertz, G. (1992). Contextual theories and indicators in world politics. International Interactions, 17(4), 285-303. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/03050629208434785
Golan, G. J. (2014). The Advertorial as a Tool of Mediated Public Diplomacy. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1268-1288. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2196/1132
Golan, G. J. & Viatchaninova, E. (2013). Government Social Responsibility in Public Diplomacy: Russia’s strategic use of advertorials. Public Relations Review, 39(4), 403-405. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.09.011
Goodman, M. B. (2006). The role of business in public diplomacy. Journal of Business Strategy, 27(3), 5-7. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/02756660610663763
Graham, S. E. (2014). Emotion and Public Diplomacy: Dispositions in International Communications, Dialogue, and Persuasion. International Studies Review, 16(4), 522-534. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/misr.12156
Gregory, B. (2011). American Public Diplomacy: Enduring Characteristics, Elusive Transformation. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 6(3-4), 351-372. https://www.doi.org/10.1163/187119111X583941
Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society (Vol. 1). Boston: Beacon Press.
Hall, I. (2012). India’s New Public Diplomacy. Asian Survey, 52(6), 1089-1110. https://www.doi.org/10.1525/as.2012.52.6.1089
van Ham, P. (2003). War, Lies, and Videotape: Public Diplomacy and the USA’s War on Terrorism. Security Dialogue, 34(4), 427-444. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0967010603344004
van Ham, P. (2010). Social Power in International Politics. New York: Routledge.
Hartig, F. (2015). Communicating China to the World: Confucius Institutes and China’s Strategic Narratives. Politics, 35(3-4), 245-258. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12093
Hayden, C. (2009). Applied Public Diplomacy: A Marketing Communications Exchange Program in Saudi Arabia. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(4), 533-548. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0002764209347629
Hayden, C., Waisanen, D. & Osipova, Y. (2013). Facilitating the Conversation: The 2012 U.S. Presidential Election and Public Diplomacy Through social media. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(11), 1623-1642. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0002764213505365
Hobolt, S. B. (2016). The Brexit vote: A divided nation, a divided continent. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 1259-1277. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1225785
d’Hooghe, I. (2008). Into High Gear: China’s Public Diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 3(1), 37-61. https://www.doi.org/10.1163/187119008X284524
Huysmans, J. (1998) Security! What do you mean? From concept to thick signifier. European Journal of International Relations 4(2), 226-255. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1354066198004002004
Ikenberry, G. J. (2018). The end of liberal international order? International Affairs, 94(1), 7-23. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix241
Johansson-Nogués, E. (2018). The EU’s ontological (in)security: Stabilising the ENP area… and the EU-self? Cooperation and Conflict, 53(4), 528-544. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0010836717750197
Johns, G. (2006). The Essential Impact of Context on Organizational Behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 386-408. https://www.doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.20208687
Kaarbo, J. & Beasley, R. K. (1999). A Practical Guide to the Comparative Case Study Method in Political Psychology. Political Psychology, 20(2), 369-391. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00149
Kovala, U. (2014). Theories of Context, Theorizing Context. Journal of Literary Theory, 8(1), 158-177. https://www.doi.org/10.1515/jlt-2014-0007
Kunczik, M. (1997). Images of Nations and International Public Relations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lake, D. A., Martin, L. L. & Risse, T. (2021). Challenges to the Liberal Order: Reflections on International Organization. International Organization, 75(2), 225-257. https://www.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000636
Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas: A series of addresses (pp. 37-51). New York, NY: Institute for Religious and Social Studies.
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H. & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the “Post-Truth” Era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353-369. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
Macnamara, J. (2012). Corporate and organisational diplomacy: An alternative paradigm to PR. Journal of Communication Management, 16(3), 312-325. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/13632541211245794
Mälksoo, M. (2016). From the ESS to the EU Global Strategy: External policy, internal purpose. Contemporary Security Policy, 37(3), 374-388. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2016.1238245
Manners, I. (2002). Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 235-258. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00353
Mattern, J. B. (2005). Why `Soft Power’ Isn’t So Soft: Representational Force and the Sociolinguistic Construction of Attraction in World Politics. Millennium, 33(3), 583-612. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/03058298050330031601
Melki, J. & Jabado, M. (2016). Mediated Public Diplomacy of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria: The Synergistic Use of Terrorism, Social Media and Branding. Media and Communication, 4(2), 92-103. https://www.doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i2.432
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: JosseyBass.
Morillas, P. (2019), Strategy-Making in the EU. From Foreign and Security Policy to External Action. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Moss, J., Robinson, E. & Watts, J. (2020). Brexit and the Everyday Politics of Emotion: Methodological Lessons from History. Political Studies, 68(4), 837-856. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0032321720911915
Nye, J. (2004) Soft Power. The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.
Ordeix-Rigo, E. & Duarte, J. (2009). From Public Diplomacy to Corporate Diplomacy: Increasing Corporation’s Legitimacy and Influence. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(4), 549-564. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0002764209347630
Pamment, J. (2014). Strategic Narratives in US Public Diplomacy: A Critical Geopolitics. Popular Communication, 12(1), 48-64. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2013.868899
Parekh, B. (1992). The Cultural Particularity of Liberal Democracy. Political Studies, 40(1), 160-175. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1992.tb01819.x
Pavón-Guinea, A. (2021). Conflict, power, and difference in dialogue: A conversation between public diplomacy and positioning theory. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy. https://www.doi.org/10.1057/s41254-021-00207-5
Platt, J. R. (1964). Strong Inference: Certain systematic methods of scientific thinking may produce much more rapid progress than others. Science, 146(3642), 347-363. https://www.doi.org/10.1126/science.146.3642.347
Potter, E. & Copeland, D. (2008). Public Diplomacy in Conflict Zones: Military Information Operations Meet Political Counter-Insurgency. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 3(3), 277-297. https://www.doi.org/10.1163/187119108X367161
Public Diplomacy Alumni Association. (2008). What is public diplomacy? Public Diplomacy Alumni Association, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.publicdiplomacy.org/1.html
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Rashid, Y., Rashid, A., Warraich, M. A., Sabir, S. S. & Waseem, A. (2019). Case Study Method: A Step-by-Step Guide for Business Researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1609406919862424
Rasmussen, S. B. (2010). The Messages and Practices of the European Union’s Public Diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 5(3), 263-287. https://www.doi.org/10.1163/187119110X508521
Rawnsley, G. D. (2015). To Know Us is to Love Us: Public Diplomacy and International Broadcasting in Contemporary Russia and China. Politics, 35(3-4), 273-286. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12104
Reuters Institute (2022). Digital News Report. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/es/digital-news-report/2022
Roselle, L., Miskimmon, A., & O’Loughlin, B. (2014). Strategic narrative: A new means to understand soft power. Media, War & Conflict, 7(1), 70-84. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1750635213516696
Ruggie, J. G. (1982). International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order. International Organization, 36(2), 379-415. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706527
Rule, P., & John, V. M. (2015). A Necessary Dialogue: Theory in Case Study Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(4). https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1609406915611575
Sapienza, Z. S., Iyer, N., & Veenstra, A. S. (2015). Reading Lasswell’s Model of Communication Backward: Three Scholarly Misconceptions. Mass Communication and Society, 18(5), 599-622. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1063666
Sevin, E., Metzgar, E.T. & Hayden, C. (2019). The Scholarship of Public Diplomacy: Analysis of a Growing Field. International Journal of Communication, 13, 4814-4837. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/10020/2813
Sheafer, T., Shenhav, S. R., Takens, J., & van Atteveldt, W. (2014). Relative Political and Value Proximity in Mediated Public Diplomacy: The Effect of State-Level Homophily on International Frame Building. Political Communication, 31(1), 149-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2013.799107
Snow, N. (2020). Public Diplomacy. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.518
Snow, C. (2006). Public diplomacy practitioners: A changing cast of characters. Journal of Business Strategy, 27(3), 18-21, https://www.doi.org/10.1108/02756660610663781
Subotić, J. (2016). Narrative, Ontological Security, and Foreign Policy Change, Foreign Policy Analysis, 12(4), 610-627. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12089
Sun, H. H. (2008). International political marketing: A case study of United States soft power and public diplomacy. Journal of Public Affairs, 8(3), 165-183. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/pa.301
Suri, N. (2011). Public Diplomacy in India’s Foreign Policy. Strategic Analysis, 35(2), 297-303. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2011.542927
Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 443-466). London: Sage.
Terzi, Ö., Palm, T., & Gürkan, S. (2021). Introduction: Emotion(al) norms in EUropean foreign policy. Global Affairs, 7(2), 93-102. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2021.1953394
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) (1949). The North Atlantic Treaty. Retrieved from https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_17120.htm
The Treaty of Lisbon (2007). Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/5/the-treaty-of-lisbon
Tocci, N. (2017). Framing the EU global strategy. A stronger Europe in a fragile world. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tuch, H. N. (1990). Communicating with the world: U.S. public diplomacy overseas. New York: St. Martins.
United Nations (UN) (1945). United Nations Charter. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/full-text
Vela, J. de S. E., & Xifra, J. (2015). International representation strategies for stateless nations: The case of Catalonia’s cultural diplomacy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 11(1), 83-96. https://www.doi.org/10.1057/pb.2014.17
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151. https://www.doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
de Vreese, C. H., Esser, F., Aalberg, T., Reinemann, C., & Stanyer, J. (2018). Populism as an Expression of Political Communication Content and Style: A New Perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(4), 423-438. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1940161218790035
Wang, J. (2006). Public diplomacy and global business. Journal of Business Strategy, 27(3), 41-49. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/02756660610663826
Wastnidge, E. (2015). The Modalities of Iranian Soft Power: From Cultural Diplomacy to Soft War. Politics, 35(3-4), 364-377. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12084
Weber, M. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Weber, M. (1949). The Methodology of the Social Sciences. New York: Free Press.
White, C. L. (2015). Exploring the role of private-sector corporations in public diplomacy. Public Relations Inquiry, 4(3), 305-321. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/2046147X15614883
Wodak, R. (2015). The Politics of Fear. What Right‐Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage.
Wu, H. (2019). Three dimensions of China’s “outward-oriented” higher education internation¬alization. Higher Education, 77(1), 81-96. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0262-1
Yang, A., & Taylor, M. (2014). Public diplomacy in a networked society: The Chinese government-NGO coalition network on acquired immune deficiency syndrome prevention. International Communication Gazette, 76(7), 575-593. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1748048514538929
Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Zaharna, R. S. (2015). Culture posts: What about the public diplomacy context? USC Center on Public Diplomacy. Retrieved from https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/culture-posts-what-about-public-diplomacy-context
Zhang, J. (2013). A Strategic Issue Management (SIM) Approach to Social Media Use in Public Diplomacy. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(9), 1312-1331. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0002764213487734
Zöllner, O. (2006). A quest for dialogue in international broadcasting: Germany’s public diplomacy targeting Arab audiences. Global Media and Communication, 2(2), 160-182. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1742766506061817
Metrics
|
|
Details
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.
