Tradition: where MacIntyre meets Hayek to Ground Ethical Governance
Article Sidebar
0)
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
0
This article explores the concept of tradition as the broader ethical dimension in governance networks. We comprehensively address the notions of traditions from the work of the philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre and the economist Friedrich Hayek. Unlike the standard view, MacIntyre and Hayek offer some common understanding regarding the role of tradition in society. Both authors find support in the natural law tradition through different paths. Based on a review of their works, we point to preliminary directions for considering the dynamic of traditions in governance networks. Traditions involve spontaneous and organized means, the sharing of accumulated wisdom, and the ground to define the common good. Network governance represents a context where different traditions meet.
Keywords
References
Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., Fidan, S. S. (2021). The Influence of Alasdair MacIntyre's "After Virtue" Book on Business Ethics Studies: A Citation Concept Analysis. Business Ethics, Environment & Responsibility, 00, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12393
Angeli, E. (2017). Uma análise sobre a abordagem institucional de Hayek e alguns de seus conceitos. Estudos Econômicos, São Paulo, 47(3), 559-586. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-41614735eda
Angner, E. (2007). Hayek and Natural Law. Abington, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203962213
Ansell, C., Torfing, J. (Eds.) (2022). Handbook on Theories of Governance. (2nd ed.) Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782548508
Barry, N. P. (1982). Hayek's Social and Economic Philosophy. London: MacMillan.
Beadle, R. (2017). MacIntyre's Influence on Business Ethics. In Sison, A. J. G, Beabout, G. R., Ferrero, I. (Eds.). Handbook of Virtue Ethics in Business and Management. (59-67). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6510-8_2
Bernacchio, C., Knight, K. (2020). MacIntyre and Political Philosophy. In Beadle, R., Moore, G. (Eds.). Learning from MacIntyre. (117-139). Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2rsfdmq.10
Blackledge, P. (2009). Alasdair MacIntyre: Social Practices, Marxism and Ethical Anti-Capitalism. Political Studies, 57, 866-884. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00770.x
Boettke, P. (2018). F. A. Hayek: Economics, Political Economy and Social Philosophy. London: Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-41160-0
Boudreaux, D. J. (2017). Menos Estado e mais liberdade: o essencial do pensamento de F. A. Hayek. Barueri: Faro Editorial.
Contreras, F. J. (Ed.). The Threats of Natural Law: Unravelling a Philosophical Tradition. Col. IUS Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice. Vol 22. Dordrecht: Springer.
Cruz Prados, A. (2021). Sobre la realidad del derecho, filosofia política. Pamplona: EUNSA.
Ebenstein, A. (2003). Hayek's Journey: the Mind of Friedrich Hayek. London: Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-7379-5
Ferrero, I., Sison, A. J. G. (2014). A Quantitative Analysis of Authors, Schools and Themes in Virtue Ethics Articles in Business Ethics and Management Journals (1980-2011). Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(4), 375-400. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12057
Jacinto, E., Ames, M. F. D. C., Serafim, M. C., Zappellini, M. B. (2023). Religion Spirituality Influences in the Governance of Faith Based Organizations during the Covid Pandemic. Public Organization Review, 23(2), 531- 550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-023-00704-6
Galeotti, A. E. (1987). Individualism, Social Rules, Tradition: the Case of Friedrich Hayek. Political Theory, 15(2), 163-181. https://www.jstor.org/stable/191673 https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591787015002001
Gaus, G. (2006). F. Hayek on the Evolution of Society and Mind. In Feser, E. (Ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Hayek. (233-258). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521849772.013
Grice-Hutchinson, M. (1952). The School of Salamanca. Clarendon Press. https://cdn.mises.org/The%20School%20of%20Salamanca_3.pdf
Hayek, F. A. (1978). New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics, and the History of Ideas. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226321288.001.0001
Hayek, F. A. (1988). The fatal conceit: the errors of socialism. Chicago: Chicago University Press. The CollectedWorks of F. A. Hayek, v. 1. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226321158.001.0001
Hayek, F. A. (2011). The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: Chicago University Press. The CollectedWorks of F. A. Hayek, v. 17. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226320519.001.0001
Hayek, F. A. (2013). Law, Legislation and Liberty. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887685
Hayek, F. A. (2014). The Market and other Orders. London: Routledge. The CollectedWorks of F. A. Hayek, v. 15. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226089690.001.0001
Hayek, F. A. (2018). The Sensory Order and Other Writings on the Foundations of Theoretical Psychology. London: Routledge. The Collected Works of F. A. Hayek, v. 14. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315734873
Kilpatrick Jr., H. (2001). Complexity, Spontaneous Order, and Friedrich Hayek: are Spontaneous Order and Complexity Essentially the Same Thing? Complexity, 6(3), 16-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/cplx.1035
Kissler, L., Heidemann, F. G. (2006). Governança pública: novo modelo regulatório para as relações entre Estado, mercado e sociedade? RAP, 40(3), 479-499. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122006000300008
Knight, K. (2005). Aristotelianism versus Communitarianism. Analyse & Kritik, 27, 259-273. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2005-0203
Lutz, C. S. (2004). Tradition in the Ethics of Alasdair MacIntyre: Relativism, Thomism, and Philosophy. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
MacIntyre, A. (1990). Three Rival Versions of Moral Inquiry: Encyclopaedia, Genealogy, and Tradition (Gifford Lectures). University of Notre Dame Press.
MacIntyre, A. (2006). Ethics and Politics, Selected Essays, vol. 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606670
MacIntyre, A. (2007). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. (3. ed). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
MacIntyre, A. (2009). God, Philosophies, Universities, a Selective History of the Catholic Philosophical Tradition. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
MacIntyre, A. (2016). Ethics in the Conflicts of Modernity: An Essay on Desire, Practical Reasoning, and Narrative. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316816967
Mion, G., Vigolo, V., Bonfanti, A., Tessari, R. (2023). The Virtuousness of Ethical Networks: How to Foster Virtuous Practices in Nonprofit Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 188, 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05326-y
Moore, G. (2012). The Virtue of Governance, the Governance of Virtue. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 293-318. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201222221
Painter, M., Peters, B. G. (Eds.) (2010). Tradition and Public Administration. New York: Palgrave Mcmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230289635
Peterson, D. J. (2014). Economics and Morality: Friedrich von Hayek and the Common Good. Humanistas, 27(1-2), 82-121. https://doi.org/10.5840/humanitas2014271/24
Porter, J. (2003). Tradition in the Recent Work of Alasdair MacIntyre. In Murphy, M. C. (Ed.). Alasdair MacIntyre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 38-69. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609961.003
Raeder, L. C. (1998). Liberalism and the Common Good: A Hayekian Perspective on Communitarianism. Independent Review, II(4), 519-535. https://www.independent.org/pdf/tir/tir_02_4_03_raeder.pdf
Ramis-Barceló, R. (2013). Alasdair MacIntyre on Natural Law. In Contreras, F. J. (Ed.). The Threats of Natural Law: Unravelling a Philosophical Tradition. Col. IUS Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, 22, 191-209. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5656-4_12
Redín-Goñi, D., Sison, A. J. G. (2023). Algunas consideraciones sobre el derecho al libre comercio en la doctrina de Francisco de Vitoria. Revista Empresa Y Humanismo, 26(2), 159-184. https://doi.org/10.15581/015.XXVI.2.159-184
Salm, J. F., Menegasso, M. E. (2009). Models of Public Administration as Complementary Strategies for co-Production of the Public Good. Revista de Ciências da Administração, 11(25), 97-96. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2009v11n25p83
Schumpeter, J. A. (1954). History of Economic Analysis. Oxford University Press.
Scruton, R. (2006). Hayek and Conservatism. In Feser, E. (Ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Hayek. (208-231). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521849772.012
Skoble, A. (2006). Hayek, the Philosopher of Law. In Feser, E. (Ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Hayek. (171-181). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521849772.010
Spicer, M. W. (1993). On Friedrich Hayek and Public Administration: an Argument for Discretion with Rules. Administration & Society, 25(1), 46- 59. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539979302500103
Metrics
|
|
Details
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Revista Empresa y Humanismo, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.
