Percepciones del estudiantado sobre el «feedback» sostenible: un análisis de redes en una universidad española
Barra lateral del artículo
163)Cómo citar
239
Resumen
El estudio pretende describir las prácticas de feedback en una universidad española y analizar su alineación con los principios del feedback sostenible. Se recopilaron datos de 261 estudiantes a través de un cuestionario en línea. Además de análisis descriptivos, se realizó un análisis de redes psicométricas para capturar la naturaleza dinámica e interactiva del feedback sostenible. Los resultados indican que, si bien los estudiantes interactúan con diversas fuentes y muestran esfuerzos hacia la autorregulación, el profesorado desempeña un papel central en las prácticas de feedback. Estos hallazgos destacan la importancia de intensificar los esfuerzos para promover el feedback sostenible.
Referencias
Ajjawi, R. y Boud, D. (2017). Researching feedback dialogue: An interactional analysis approach. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(2), 252-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1102863
Barrientos Hernán, E. J. y López-Pastor, V. (2017). Evaluación orientada al aprendizaje en educación superior: últimas tendencias. Revista Infancia, Educación y Aprendizaje, 3(2), 582-587. https://doi.org/10.22370/ieya.2017.3.2.784
Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at University. SRHE and Open University Press.
Boud, D. (1995). Enhancing learning through self-assessment. Kogan Page.
Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/713695728
Boud, D. y Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698-712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
Boud, D. y Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 400-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133
Broadbent, J., Sharman, S., Panadero, E. y Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M. (2021). How does self-regulated learning influence formative assessment and summative grade? Comparing online and blended learners. The Internet and Higher Education, 50, 100805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100805
Brookhart, S. M. (2008). How to give effective feedback to your students. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Buckingham Shum, S., Lim, L.-A., Boud, D., Bearman, M. y Dawson, P. (2023). A comparative analysis of the skilled use of automated feedback tools through the lens of teacher feedback literacy. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00410-9
Carless, D. (2007). Learning-oriented assessment: conceptual bases and practical implications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(1), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290601081332
Carless, D. (2015). Exploring learning-oriented assessment processes. Higher Education, 69, 963-976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9816-z
Carless, D. (2013). Sustainable feedback and the development of student self-evaluative capacities. En S. Merry, M. Price, D. Carless y M. Tarras (Eds.), Reconceptualising feedback in higher education (pp. 113-122). Routledge.
Carless, D. (2019). Feedback loops and the longer-term: Towards feedback spirals. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(5), 705-714. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1531108
Carless, D. y Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315-1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M. y Lam, J. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 395-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003642449
Carless, D. y Winstone, N. (2023). Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(1), 150-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372
Chou, C.-Y. y Zou, N.-B. (2020). An analysis of internal and external feedback in self-regulated learning activities mediated by self-regulated learning tools and open learner models. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00233-y
Corral, D., Carpenter, S. K. y Clingan-Siverly, S. (2021). The effects of immediate versus delayed feedback on complex concept learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(4), 786-799. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820977739
Crowne, D. P. y Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive: studies in evaluative dependence. Wiley.
Duffy, J., Warren, K. y Walsh, M. (2001). Classroom interactions: Gender of teacher, gender of student, and classroom subject. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 45(9-10), 579-593. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014892408105
Epskamp, S., Borsboom, D. y Fried, E. I. (2018). Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 195-212. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1
Epskamp, S., Cramer, A., Waldorp, L., Schmittmann, V. y Borsboom, D. (2012). qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(4), 1-18. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i04/
Epstein, M. L., Lazarus, A. D., Calvano, T. B., Matthews, K. A., Hendel, R. A., Epstein, B. B. y Brosvic, G. M. (2002). Immediate feedback assessment technique promotes learning and corrects inaccurate first responses. The Psychological Record, 52, 187-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395423
Fraile, J., Pardo, R. y Panadero, E. (2018). Autoevaluación y autocalificación en el Grado en Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte: Estudio censal de las guías docentes. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 22(3), 163-182. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v22i3.7997
García-Jiménez, E., Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S. y Rodríguez-Gómez, G. (2011). Diseño e implementación de la retroalimentación y proalimentación en la universidad. Universidad de Cádiz.
Gómez-Ruiz, M. A., Rodríguez-Gómez, G. e Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S. (2013). Desarrollo de las competencias básicas de los estudiantes de Educación Superior mediante la e-Evaluación orientada al aprendizaje. RELIEVE, 19(1), art. 1. https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.19.1.2457
Hattie, J. y Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hawe, E. y Dixon, H. (2017). Assessment for learning: a catalyst for student self-regulation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1181-1192. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1236360
Henderson, M., Boud, D., Molloy, E., Dawson P., Phillips, M., Ryan, T. y Mahoney, P. (2018). Feedback for Learning: Closing the Assessment Loop - Final Report. Australian Government Department of Education and Training.
Hoo, H.-T., Deneen, C. y Boud, D. (2022). Developing student feedback literacy through self and peer assessment interventions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(3), 444-457. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1925871
Hooda, M., Rana, C., Dahiya, O., Rizwan, A. y Hossain, M. S. (2022). Artificial intelligence for assessment and feedback to enhance student success in higher education. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 215722. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5215722
Hounsell, D. (2007). Towards more sustainable feedback to students. En D. Boud y N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education (pp. 111-123). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203964309
Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S., Rodríguez-Gómez, G. y Boud, D. (2020). Developing student competence through peer assessment: The role of feedback, self-regulation and evaluative judgement. Higher Education, 80(1), 137-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00469-2
Lauritzen, S. L. (1996). Graphical models. Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198522195.001.0001
Li, W. y Zhang, F. (2021). Tracing the path toward self-regulated revision: an interplay of instructor feedback, peer feedback, and revision goals. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.612088
Little, T., Dawson, P., Boud, D. y Tai, J. (2024). Can students' feedback literacy be improved? A scoping review of interventions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(1), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2177613
Molloy, E., Boud, D. y Henderson, M. (2020). Developing a learning-centred framework for feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 527-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955
O'Donovan, B., Rust, C. y Price, M. (2016). A scholarly approach to solving the feedback dilemma in practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(6), 938-949. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1052774
Padilla, M. T. y Gil Flores, J. (2008). La evaluación orientada al aprendizaje en la Educación Superior: condiciones y estrategias para su aplicación en la docencia universitaria. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 261, 467-486.
Panadero, E. y Alqassab, M. (2019). An empirical review of anonymity effects in peer assessment, peer feedback, peer review, peer evaluation and peer grading. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), 1253-1278. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1600186
Panadero, E., Alqassab, M., Fernández Ruiz, J. y Ocampo, J. C. (2023). A systematic review on peer assessment: intrapersonal and interpersonal factors. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(8), 1053-1075. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2164884
Panadero, E., Jonsson, A. y Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004
Panadero, E., Jonsson, A. y Strijbos, J.-W. (2016). Scaffolding self-regulated learning through self-assessment and peer assessment: Guidelines for classroom implementation. En D. Laveault y L. Allal (Eds.), Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation. The enabling power of assessment (pp. 311-326). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_18
Panadero, E., Lipnevich, A. y Broadbent, J. (2019). Turning self-assessment into self-feedback. En D. Boud, M. D. Henderson, R. Ajjawi y E. Molloy (Eds.), The impact of feedback in higher education: Improving assessment outcomes for learners (pp. 147-163). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25112-3_9
Panadero, E., García Pérez, D., Fernández Ruiz, J., Fraile, J., Sánchez-Iglesias, I. y Brown, G. T. L. (2022). University students' strategies and criteria during self-assessment: Instructor's feedback, rubrics, and year level effects. European Journal of Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00639-4
R Core Team (2024). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org
RStudio Team (2019). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio. http://www.rstudio.com
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
Sadler, I., Reimann, N. y Sambell, K. (2023). Feedforward practices: a systematic review of the literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(3), 305-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2073434
Sortkær, B. y Reimer, D. (2021). Gender differences in students' perceptions of teacher and peer feedback in mathematics: lessons from Denmark. Oxford Review of Education, 48, 184-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2021.1948396
Stenalt, M. H. y Lassesen, B. (2022). Does student agency benefit student learning? A systematic review of higher education research. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(5), 653-669. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1967874
Stiggins, R. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment for learning: A path to success in standards-based schools. The Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324-328. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170508700414
Strijbos, J. W., Narciss, S. y Dünnebier, K. (2010). Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 291-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008
Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P. y Panadero, E. (2018). Developing evaluative judgment: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76(3), 467-481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3
Teves, L. y Cueto, J. J. (2020). El Análisis de Redes Sociales (ARS) aplicado a problemáticas actuales. Lineamientos para su implementación en proyectos de investigación y de gestión. AWARI, 1(2), 82-98.
Vaessen, B. E., van den Beemt, A., van de Watering, G., van Meeuwen, L. W., Lemmens, L. y den Brok, P. (2017). Students' perception of frequent assessments and its relation to motivation and grades in a statistics course: A pilot study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(6), 872-886. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1204532
Wei, T. y Simko, V. (2021). R package 'corrplot': Visualization of a Correlation Matrix (Version 0.92). https://github.com/taiyun/corrplot
Winstone, N. E. y Boud, D. (2022). The need to disentangle assessment and feedback in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), 656-667. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1779687
Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K. y Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087
Yan, Z. y Carless, D. (2022). Self-assessment is about more than self: The enabling role of feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(7), 1116-1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2001431
Sección
CESIÓN DE DERECHOS
Al enviar el artículo para su evaluación y posterior publicación en la revista Estudios sobre Educación, las personas autoras ceden de manera exclusiva los derechos patrimoniales y/o de explotación: reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública, transformación/traducción/
En el caso de que el artículo no fuera aceptado para su publicación, esta cesión de derechos decae con la comunicación de la negativa a las personas autoras.
Las personas autoras afirman que el artículo es inédito, que no ha sido enviado simultáneamente a otro medio de publicación y que los derechos no han sido cedidos de forma exclusiva con anterioridad. Se hacen responsables frente a la Universidad de Navarra a través de su Servicio de Publicaciones de la autoría y originalidad de su obra, así como de todas las cargas pecuniarias que pudieran derivarse para Universidad de Navarra a través de su Servicio de Publicaciones, a favor de terceros con motivo de acciones, reclamaciones o conflictos derivados del incumplimiento de obligaciones por parte de las personas autoras.