Vaguedad y relevancia: metáforas en los titulares de prensa sobre las enfermedades poco frecuentes
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Palabras clave
Referencias
Andersen, Peter A., y Laura K. Guerrero, eds. Handbook of Communication and Emotion: Research, Theory, Applications, and Contexts. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998.
Angeli, Elizabeth L. “Metaphors in the Rhetoric of Pandemic Flu: Electronic Media Coverage of H1N1 and Swine Flu”. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 42.3 (2012): 203-22.
Athanasiadou, Angeliki, y Eloebieta Tabakowska, eds. Speaking of Emotions: Conceptualisation and Expression. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1998.
Bañón Hernández, Antonio M., y Josep A. Solves Almela. “El debate sobre las enfermedades poco frecuentes: una mirada a través de los medios de comunicación”. Mètode, Science Studies Journal 6 (2015): 208-13.
Blakemore, Diane. “On the Descriptive Ineffability of Expressive Meaning”. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (2011): 3537-50.
Caffi, Claudia. Mitigation. Oxford: Elsevier, 2007.
Caffi, Claudia, y Richard W. Janney, eds. “Involvement in Language”. Número especial de Journal of Pragmatics 22 (1994).
Cameron, Lynne. “Patterns of Metaphor Use in Reconciliation Talk”. Discourse and Society 18.2 (2007): 197-222.
Carruthers, Peter. “The Case for Massively Modular Models of Mind”. Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Sciences. Ed. Rob Stainton. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2006. 3-21.
Carston, Robyn. Thoughts and Utterances. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002.
Carston, Robyn. “Metaphor: Ad hoc Concepts, Literal Meaning and Mental Images”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110 (2010): 295-321.
Carston, Robyn. “Word Meaning and Concept Expressed”. The Linguistic Review 29 (2012a): 607-23.
Carston, Robyn. “Metaphor, Ad hoc Concepts and Word Meaning: More Questions than Answers”. UCLWorking Papers in Linguistics 14 (2012b). 1 de junio de 2017. <http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi= 10.1.1.232.7492&rep=rep1&type=pdf>.
Carston, Robyn. “Word Meaning, What is Said and Explicature”. What is Said and What is Not. Eds. Carlo Penco y Filippo Domaneschi. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 2013. 175-203.
Carston, Robyn. “The Heterogeneity of Procedural Meaning”. Lingua 175- 176 (2016): 154-66.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke/ Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. “Britain as a Container: Immigration Metaphors in the 2005 Election Campaign”. Discourse and Society 17.5 (2006): 563-81.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. 2.ª ed. Basingstoke/Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. “Forensic Deliberations on ‘Purposeful Metaphor’”. Metaphor and the Social World 2.1 (2012): 1-21.
Chiang, Wen-Yu, y Ren-Feng Duann. “Conceptual Metaphors for SARS: ‘War’ between Whom?”. Discourse and Society 18.5 (2007): 579-602.
Citron, Francesca M. M., y Adele E. Goldberg, “Metaphorical Sentences are More Emotionally Engaging than their Literal Counterparts”. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 26 (2014): 2585-95.
Citron, Francesca M. M., Jeremie Güsten, Nora Michaelis y Adele E. Goldberg. “Conventional Metaphors in Longer Passages Evoke Affective Brain Response”. NeuroImage 139 (2016): 218-30.
Cosmides, Leda, y John Tooby. “From Function to Structure: The Role of Evolutionary Biology and Computational Theories in Cognitive Neu- roscience”. The Cognitive Neurosciences. Ed. Michael S. Gazzaniga. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995. 1199-210.
Cosmides, Leda, y John Tooby. “Evolutionary Psychology and the Emotions”. Handbook of Emotions. Eds. Michael Lewis, Jeannette, M. Haviland-Jones y Lisa Fieldman. 2.ª ed. Barrett, NY: Guilford, 2000. 91-115.
Deignan, Alice. “The Evaluative Properties of Metaphors”. Researching and Applying Metaphor in the Real World. Eds. Graham Low, Alice Deignan, Lynne Cameron y Zazie Todd. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2010. 357- 74.
Demjén, Zsófia, Elena Semino y Veronika Koller. “Metaphors for ‘Good’ and ‘Bad’ Deaths: A Health Professional View”. Metaphor and the Social World 6.1 (2016): 1-19.
Dirven, René, Bruce Hawkins y Esra Sandikcioglu, eds. Language and Ideology, I: Theoretical Cognitive Approaches. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2001.
Dirven, René, Frank Roslyn y Martin Pütz. “Introduction: Categories, Cognitive Models and Ideologies”. Cognitive Models in Language and Thought: Ideology, Metaphors and Meanings. Eds. René Dirven, Frank Roslyn y Martin Pütz. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2003. 1-22.
Dixon-Woods, Mary, Bridget Young y David Heney. Rethinking Experiences of Childhood Cancer: a Multidisciplinary Approach to Chronic Childhood Illness. Berkshire, UK: McGraw-Hill Education, 2005.
Fainsilber, Lynn, y Andrew Ortony. “Metaphor Production in the Description of Emotional States”. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 2 (1987): 239-50.
Faucher, Luc, y Christine Tappolet. “The Modularity of Emotions”. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32 (2006): VII-XXXI.
George, Daniel R., Erin R. Whitehouse y Peter J. Whitehouse. “Asking More of Our Metaphors: Narrative Strategies to End the ‘War on Alzheimer’s’ and Humanize Cognitive Aging”. The American Journal of Bioethics 16.10 (2016): 22-24.
Gibbs, Raymond, y Heather Franks. “Embodied Metaphor in Women’s Narratives About their Experiences with Cancer”. Health Communication 14.2 (2002): 139-65.
Gibbs, Raymond, John S. Leggit y Elizabeth A. Turner. “What’s Special about Figurative Language in Emotional Communication?”. The Verbal Communication of Emotions: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Ed. Susan R. Fussell. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002. 125-49.
Goatly, Andrew. The Language of Metaphors. London: Routledge, 1997.
Goatly, Andrew. Washing the Brain: Metaphor and Hidden Ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2007.
Grice, Paul. “Meaning”. The Philosophical Review 66 (1957): 377-88.
Ifantidou, Elly. “Newspaper Headlines and Relevance: Ad hoc Concepts in Ad hoc Contexts”. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (2009): 699-720.
Jansen, Sue Curry, y Don Sabo. “The Sport/War Metaphor: Hegemonic Masculinity, the Persian Gulf War, and the New World Order”. Sociology of Sports Journal 11 (1994): 1-17.
Jiménez, Àngels. “Acceso a información periodística a través de servicios de press clipping”. Hipertext.net 1 (2003). 1 de junio de 2017. <https://www.upf.edu/hipertextnet/numero-1/press-clipping.html>.
Kennedy, Victor. “Intended Tropes and Unintended Metatropes in Reporting on the War in Kosovo”. Metaphor and Symbol 15.4 (2000): 253-65.
Lakoff, George. Moral Politics: What Conservatives Know that Liberals Don’t. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
Lakoff, George. “Language and Emotion”. Emotion Review 8.3 (2016): 269-73.
Lakoff, George, y Mark Johnson. Metaphors we Live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
Larson, Brendon M. H., Brigitte Nerlich y Patrick Wallis. “Metaphors and Biorisks: The War on Infectious Diseases and Invasive Species”. Science Communication 26.3 (2005): 243-68.
Musolff, Andreas. Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.
Musolff, Andreas. “Metaphor Scenarios in Public Discourse”. Metaphor & Symbol 21.1 (2006): 23-38.
Niemeier, Susanne, y René Dirven, eds. The Language of Emotions: Conceptualization, Expression, and Theoretical Foundation. Duisburg: Grand Mercator University, 2006.
Ortony, Andrew, y Lynn Fainsilber. “The Role of Metaphors in Descriptions of Emotions”. Workshop on Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics (1987): 181-84.
Pinker, Steven. How the Mind Works. London: Allen Lane, 1997.
Potts, Christopher. “The Expressive Dimension”. Theoretical Linguistics 32.2 (2007): 165-97.
Potts, Christopher. “Conventional Implicature and Expressive Content”. Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning. Eds. Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger y Paul Portner. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2012. 2516-35.
Pragglejaz Group. “MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse”. Metaphor and Symbol 22.1 (2007): 1-39.
Reisfield, Gary, y George Wilson. “Use of Metaphor in the Discourse on Cancer”. Journal of Clinical Oncology 22.19 (2004): 4024-27.
Rojo, Ana, Marina Ramos y Javier Valenzuela. “The Emotional Impact of Translation: A Heart Rate Study”. Journal of Pragmatics 71 (2014): 31- 44.
Rubio-Fernández, Paula, Catherine Wearing y Robyn Carston. “Metaphor and Hyperbole: Testing the Continuity Hypothesis”. Metaphor & Symbol 30 (2015): 24-40.
Schnall, Simone. “The Pragmatics of Emotion Language”. Psychological Inquiry 16.1 (2005): 28-31.
Seale, Clive. “Sporting Cancer: Struggle Language in News Reports of People with Cancer”. Sociology of Health and Illness 23.3 (2001): 308-29.
Seale, Clive. “Health and Media: An Overview”. Sociology of Health and Illness 25.6 (2003): 513-31.
Semino, Elena, Zsófia Demjén y Jen Demmen. “An Integrated Approach to Metaphor and Framing in Cognition, Discourse, and Practice, with an Application to Metaphors for Cancer”. Applied Linguistics (2016): 1-22.
Solves, Josep, Antonio Bañón e Inmaculada Rius. “El OBSER como centro impulsor de la investigación social de las enfermedades minoritarias”. Estudios de Comunicación y Salud. Eds. Carmen Peñafiel y José Luis Terrón. La Laguna: Sociedad Latina de Comunicación Social, 2015. 131-55.
Sontag, Susan. Illness as Metaphor. London: Allen Lane, 1979.
Sontag, Susan. Aids and Its Metaphors. Nueva York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1989.
Sperber, Dan. “The Modularity of Thought and the Epidemiology of Representations”. Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture. Eds. Lawrence A. Hirschfeld y Susan A. Gelman. Nueva York: Cambridge UP, 1994. 39-67.
Sperber, Dan. “In Defense of Massive Modularity”. Language, Brain and Cognitive Development: Essays in Honor of Jacques Melher. Ed. Emmanuel Dupoux. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2002. 47-57.
Sperber, Dan. “Modularity and Relevance: How Can a Massively Modular Mind be Flexible and Context-sensitive?”. The Innate Mind: Structure and Content. Eds. Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence y Stephen Stich. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2005. 53-68.
Sperber, Dan, y Deirdre Wilson. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 1986. Blackwell: Oxford, 1995.
Sperber, Dan, y Deirdre Wilson. “The Mapping between the Mental and the Public Lexicon”. Language and Thought. Eds. Peter Carruthers y Jill Boucher. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998. 184-200.
Sperber, Dan, y Deirdre Wilson. “Pragmatics, Modularity and Mindreading”. Mind & Language 17 (2002): 3-23.
Sperber, Dan, y Deirdre Wilson. “A Deflationary Account of Metaphors”. The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Ed. Raymond Gibbs. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2008. 84-105.
Sperber, Dan, y Deidre Wilson. “Beyond Speakers Meaning”. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 15.44 (2015): 117-49.
Vega Moreno, Rosa E. Creativity and Convention: The Pragmatics of Everyday Figurative Speech. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2007.
Vignemont, Frederique de, y Tania Singer. “The Empathic Brain: How, When and Why”. Trends in Cognitive Science 10.10 (2006): 435-41.
Wharton, Tim. Pragmatics and the Non-Verbal Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2009.
Wharton, Tim. “That Bloody so-and-so has Retired: Expressives Revisited”. Lingua 175-176 (2016): 20-35.
Williams, Julia. “Metaphors of Cancer in Scientific Popularization Articles in the British Press”. Discourse Studies 11.4 (2009): 465-95.
Wilson, Deidre. “The Conceptual-Procedural Distinction: Past, Present and Future”. Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives. Eds. Victoria Escandell Vidal, Manuel Leonetti y Aoife Ahern. Bingley: Emerald, 2011a. 3-31.
Wilson, Deidre. “Parallels and Differences in the Treatment of Metaphor in Relevance Theory and Cognitive Linguistics”. Intercultural Pragmatics 8.2 (2011b): 177-96.
Wilson, Deidre. “Reassessing the Conceptual-Procedural Distinction”. Lingua 175-176 (2016): 5-19.
Wilson, Deidre, y Robyn Carston. “A Unitary Approach to Lexical Pragmatics: Relevance, Inference and Ad hoc Concepts”. Pragmatics. Ed. Noel Burton-Roberts. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. 230-59.
Wilson, Deidre, y Dan Sperber. “Truthfulness and Relevance”. Mind 111 (2002): 583-632.
Yus, Francisco. “Propositional Attitude, Affective Attitude and Irony Comprehension”. Pragmatics & Cognition 23.1 (2016): 92-116.
Detalles
Detalles del artículo
CESIÓN DE DERECHOS
Al enviar el artículo para su evaluación y posterior publicación en la revista Rilce. Revista de Filología Hispánica, el AUTOR cede de manera exclusiva los derechos de comunicación pública, reproducción, distribución y venta para su explotación comercial a la Universidad de Navarra a través de su Servicio de Publicaciones, por el plazo máximo legal vigente -toda la vida del autor y setenta años después de su muerte o declaración de fallecimiento-, en cualquier país, y en cualquiera de las actuales y futuras modalidades de edición tanto en versión impresa como electrónica.
En el caso de que el artículo no fuera aceptado para su publicación, esta cesión de derechos decae con la comunicación de la negativa al AUTOR.
El AUTOR afirma que el artículo es inédito, que no ha sido enviado simultáneamente a otro medio de publicación y que los derechos no han sido cedidos de forma exclusiva con anterioridad. Se hace responsable frente a la Universidad de Navarra a través de su Servicio de Publicaciones de la autoría y originalidad de su obra, así como de todas las cargas pecuniarias que pudieran derivarse para Universidad de Navarra a través de su Servicio de Publicaciones, a favor de terceros con motivo de acciones, reclamaciones o conflictos derivados del incumplimiento de obligaciones por parte del AUTOR.