Audience before TV violence: functions, effects, and situated interpretations
Article Sidebar
361)
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
451
Keywords
References
ADAMS-PRICE, Carolyn y GREENE, A. L., “Secondary attachments and self-concept during adolescence”, Sex Roles, 22, 1990, pp. 187-198.
ALASUUTARI, Pertti (ed.), Rethinking the Media Audience, Sage, London, 1999.
ANDERSON, Craig A., “An update on the effects of violent video games”, Journal of Adolescence, 27, 2004, pp. 133-122.
ANDERSON, Craig A., BERKOWITZ, Leonard, DONNERSTEIN, Edward, HUESMANN, L. Rowell, JOHNSON, James D., LINZ, Daniel, MALAMUTH, Neil M. y WARTELLA, Ellen, “The influence of media violence on youth”, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4, 2003, pp. 81-110.
ANG, Ien, “Ethnography and Radical Contextualism in Audience Studies”, en ANG, Ien, Living Room Wars, Routledge, London, 1996, pp. 66-81.
ARAN, Sue, La violencia en la mirada, Tripodos, Barcelona, 2001.
ARNHEIM, Rudolph, El pensamiento visual, Paidós, Barcelona, 1998.
AUMONT, Jacques, La imagen, Paidós, Barcelona, 1992.
BANDURA, Albert, Social foundations of thought and action, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986.
BANDURA, Albert, “Social cognitive theory of mass communication”, Media Psychology, 3, 2001, pp. 265-299.
BILLIG, Michael, Arguing and Thinking. A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987.
BILLIG, Michael, “Discursive, rhetorical, and ideological messages”, en MCGARTY, C. y HASLAM, S.A. (eds.), The message of social psychology, Blackwell, Cambridge, MA, 1997, pp. 36-53.
BOLTANSKI, Luc, Distant Suffering. Morality, Media and Politics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.
BOYLE, Karen, Media and violence, Sage, London, 2005.
BRUNSDON, Charlotte, The Feminist, the Housewife, and the Soap Opera, Oxford University Press, USA, 2000.
CANTOR, Joanne, “Fright reactions to mass media”, en BRYANT, J. y ZILLMANN, D.
(eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research, (2d ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 2002, pp. 287-306.
CHIRICOS, Ted, ESCHHOLZ, Sarah, y GERTZ, Marc, “Crime, news and fear of crime: toward an identification of audience effects”, Social Problems, 44, 1997, pp. 342-357.
CHOULIARAKI, Lilie, “The Contingency of Universality. Thoughts on Discourse and Realism”, Social Semiotics, 10, 2002, pp. 83-114.
CHOULIARAKI, Lilie, “Watching 11 september: the politics of pity”, Discourse and society, 15, 2004, pp. 185-198.
COHEN, Jonathan, Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters, Mass Communication & Society, 4 (3), 2001, pp. 245-264.
CONDRY, John, The Psychology of Television, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1989.
DONNERSTEIN, Ed, SLABY Ron y ERON, Leonard, “The mass media and youth violence”, en MURRAY, J., RUBINSTEIN, E., COMSTOCK, G. (eds.), Violence and youth: Psychology´s response, 2, A.P.A., Washington, 1994, pp. 219-250.
ELLIS, John, Seeing Things, Tauris, London, 2001.
EYAL, Keren, y RUBIN, Alan M., “Viewer aggression and homophily: Identification and parasocial relationships with television characters”, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 47, 2003, pp. 77-98.
FERNÁNDEZ-VILLANUEVA, Concepción, DOMÍNGUEZ, Roberto y REVILLA, Juan Carlos, “La legitimation de la violence â la televisión et dans la vie sociale”, Les politiques Sociales, 66 (1-2), 2006a, pp. 73-84.
FERNÁNDEZ-VILLANUEVA, Concepción, DOMÍNGUEZ, Roberto, REVILLA, Juan Carlos y ANAGNOSTOU, Asymina, “Broadcasting of violence in the Spanish television: a quantitative panorama”, Aggresive Behaviour, 32 (2), 2006b, pp. 137-145.
FERNÁNDEZ-VILLANUEVA, Concepción, DOMÍNGUEZ, Roberto, REVILLA, Juan Carlos y ANAGNOSTOU, Asymina, “Formas de legitimación de la violencia en televisión”, Política y Sociedad, 41 (1), 2004, pp. 183-199.
GERBNER, George, GROSS, Larry, MORGAN, Michael, y SIGNORELLI, Nancy, Living with Television. The dynamics of the cultivation process, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1986.
GERBNER, George, GROSS, Larry, MORGAN, Michael y SIGNORELLI, Nancy, “The “mainstreaming” of America: Violence profile No. 11”, Journal of Communication Disorders, 30, 1980, pp. 10-29.
GERBNER, George, Mass media policies in changing cultures, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1977.
GERGEN, Kenneth J., Realities and relationships. Soundings in social constructionism, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994.
GERGEN, Kenneth J., “Aggression as discourse”, en MUMMENDEY, A. (ed.), The social psychology of aggression: From individual behavior to social interaction, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1984, pp. 51-68.
GONZÁLEZ REQUENA, Jesús, “Comunicación, significación, información, espectáculo”, en IMBERT, G. (coord.), Televisión y cotidianeidad. La función social de la televisión en el nuevo milenio, 2003, pp. 189-200, con acceso desde http://www.uc3m.es/uc3m/inst/mu/libroiortv.doc
HALL, Stuart, “Encoding/decoding”, en CENTRE FOR CONTEMPORARY CULTURAL STUDIES (ed.), Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972-79, Hutchinson, London, [1973] 1980, pp. 128-138.
HOFFNER, Cynthia y BUCHANAN, Martha, “Young adults’ wishful identification with Television Characters: The Role of Perceived Similarity and Character Attributes”, Media Psychology, 7, 2005, pp. 325-351.
HOFFNER, Cynthia, “Children wishful identification and parasocial interaction with favorite television characters”, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 4, 1996, pp. 389- 402.
HUESMANN, L. Rowell, “Imitation and the effects of observing media violence on behaviour”, en HURLEY, S. y CHATER, N. (eds.), Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science; Volume 2: Imitation, human development, and culture, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2005, pp. 257-266.
HUESMANN, L. Rowell, “La conexión entre la violencia en el cine y la televisión y la violencia real”, en SANMARTÍN, J. y GRISOLÍA, S. (eds.), Violencia, televisión y cine Ariel, Barcelona, 1998, pp. 87-132.
IBÁÑEZ, Tomás, Contra la dominación, Gedisa, Barcelona, 2005.
IGARTUA, Juan José, CHENG, Lifen, CORRAL, Elena, MARTÍN, Junkal, SIMÓN, Javier, BALLESTEROS, Rocío y DE LA TORRE, Alexandra, “Violencia en la ficción televisiva. Hacia la construcción de un índice de violencia desde el análisis agregado de la programación”, Zer. Revista de Estudios de Comunicación, 10, 2001, pp. 59-79.
IMBERT, Gerard, “Violencias simbólicas y juegos con los límites en la postelevision”, Les politiques sociales, 21, 2007, pp. 35-50.
IMBERT, Gerard, “Violencia y representación: nuevos modos de ver y de sentir” Cultura y Educación, 14, 3, 2002, pp. 33-41.
ÍÑIGUEZ, Lupicinio (ed.), Análisis del discurso. Manual para las ciencias sociales, UOC, Barcelona, 2003.
LACAN, Jacques, El Seminario II: el yo en la teoría de Freud y en la técnica psicoanalítica, Paidós, Barcelona, 1983.
LACAN, Jacques, Escritos II, Siglo XXI, Madrid, 1975.
LACAN, Jacques, Escritos I, Siglo XXI, Madrid, 1971.
MAFFESOLI, Michel, The Contemplation of the World: Figures of Community Style, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1996.
MOORES, Shaun, Interpreting Audiences: The Ethnography of Media Consumption, Sage, London, 1993.
MORLEY, David, Television, audiences and Cultural Studies, Routledge, London, 1992.
MORRISON, David E., “The idea of violence”, en HARDGRAVE, A.M., Violence and factual television. Annnual Review, John Libbey, London, 1993, pp. 124-129.
MULLIN, Charles R. y LINZ, Daniel, “Desensitization and resensitization to violence against women: Effects of exposure to sexually violent films on judgments of domestic violence victims”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1995, pp. 449-459.
MUSTONEN, Anu y PULKKINEN, Lea, “Television violence: a development of a coding scheme”, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 41, 1997, pp. 168-189.
PARKER, Ian, Social constructionism, dicourse and realism, Sage, London, 1998.
PARKER, Ian, Discourse dynamics, Routledge, London, 1992.
PINDADO, Julián, “Escuela y televisión: claves de una relación compleja”, C&E: Cultura y educación, 5, 1997, pp. 25-36.
POTTER, Jonathan, “Discourse analysis and discursive psychology”, en CAMIC, P.M. y RHODES, J.E. (eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 2003, pp. 73-94.
POTTER, Jonathan, “Discourse and critical social psychology”, en IBÁÑEZ, T. e ÍÑIGUEZ, L. (eds.), Critical social psychology, Sage, London, 1997, pp. 55-66.
POTTER, Jonathan, Representing reality. Discouse, rethoric and social construction, Sage, London, 1996.
POTTER, Jonathan y WETHERELL, Margaret, “Unfolding Discourse Analysis”, en WETHERELL, M., TAYLOR, S. y YATES, S.J. (eds.), Discourse Theory and practice, Sage, London, 2001, pp. 198-209.
POTTER, W. James, The 11 myths of media violence, Sage, Thousand Oaks, 2006.
POTTER, W. James y WARREN, Ron, “Humor as camouflage of televised violence”, Journal of Communication, 48, 1998, pp. 40-57.
RODRÍGUEZ SUTIL, Carlos, ESTEBAN, Juan L., TAKEUCHI, Michio, CLAUSEN, Tanya y SCOUT, Ralph, “Televised violence: a Japanese, Spanish and American comparison”, Psychological Reports, 77, 1995, pp. 995-1000.
SANDER, Ingo, “How Violent is TV Violence? An empirical investigation of factors influencing viewers perceptions of TV violence”, European Journal of communication, 12, 1997, pp. 43-98.
SCHLESINGER, Philip, HAYNES, Richard, BOYLE, Raymond, MCNAIR, Brian, DOBASH, R.Emerson, y DOBASH, Russel P., Men Viewing Violence, Broadcasting Standards Commission, London, 1998.
SHANAHAN, James, Television and Its Viewers: Cultivation Theory and Research, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.
TAJFEL, Henry, “La Catégorization Sociale”, en MOSCOVICI, Serge (ed.), Introduction à la Psychologie Sociale, vol. 1, Larousse, Paris, 1972, pp. 272-302.
TISSERON, Serge, Comment Hitchcock m´a guéri, Albin Michel, Paris, 2003.
TULLOCH, John, Watching Television Audiences: Cultural Theories and Methods, Arnold, London, 2000.
TULLOCH, John y TULLOCH, Marian, “Discourses about violence: Critical theory and the ‘TV violence’ debate”, Text, 12, 1992, pp. 183-231.
URRA, Javier, CLEMENTE, Miguel y VIDAL, Miguel Ángel, Televisión: impacto en la infancia, Siglo XXI, Madrid, 2000.
WETHERELL, Margaret, “Positioning and interpretative repertoires: conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue”, Discourse & Society, 9 (3), 1998, pp. 387-412.
WETHERELL, Margaret, TAYLOR, Stephanie y YATES, Simeon J., Discourse as data. A guide for analysis, Sage Publications & The Open University, London, 2001a.
WETHERELL, Margaret, TAYLOR, Stephanie, y YATES, Simeon J. (eds.), Discourse Theory and Practice. A Reader, Sage Publications & The Open University, London, 2001b.
WILLIAMS, Tannis MacBeth, ZABRAK, Merle L. y JOY, Lesley A., “The portrayal of aggression on North American television”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 1982, pp. 360-380.
WILSON, Barbara J., KUNKEL, Dale, LINZ, Dan, POTTER, James, DONNERSTEIN, Ed, SMITH, Stacy, BLUMENTHAL, Eva y GRAY, Timothy, “Violence in television programming overall: University of California, Santa Barbara study”, National television violence study, vol. 1, Sage, Thousand Oaks, 1997, pp. 3-267.
ZILLMANN, Dolf, “Humor and comedy”, en ZILLMANN, D. y VORDERER, P. (eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 2000.
ZILLMANN, Dolf, y WEAVER, James B, “Effects of prolonged exposure to gratuitous media violence on provoked and unprovoked hostile behaviour”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1999, pp. 145-165.
Details
Article Details
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.
