Application of Functional Theory of Political Discourse in Chilean presidential debates to determine the influence of journalists in the contents
Article Sidebar
266)
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
400
Within the growing academic interest over electoral debates, the role of the journalists who conduct the debates in determining the tenor of the answers has not been sufficiently studied. We used Chile as an extreme case, given the predominant role that the debate moderators receive here, thanks to the “journalistic panel” format utilized in them, where they take turns to interview the candidates. As a framework to describe these contents, we used Functional Theory of Political Discourse by William Benoit. Our data show that, indeed, the candidates use different combinations of said functions, depending on the different frameworks established by the rules for each debate. Clearly, the candidates tend to defend themselves from the attacks of the journalists, rather than their rivals’; and they use other strategies when the rules allow them more freedom.
Keywords
References
Acuña, F., Gutiérrez, S. & Puentes, A. (Eds.) (2007). Los primeros 50 años de la televisión chilena. Santiago de Chile: Facultad Comunicaciones UC/VTR/El Mercurio/Canal 13.
Ajilore, O. O. (2015). Acclaims, attacks and defences in Nigerian gubernatorial debate. Discourse & Communication, 9(1), 3-18. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1750481314555261
Allern, S. & von Sikorski, C. (2018). Political Scandals as a Democratic Challenge: From Important Revelations to Provocations, Trivialities, and Neglect — Introduction. International Journal of Communication, 12(1), 1-10. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/7094/2413
Anstead, N. (2016). A different beast? Televised election debates in parliamentary democracies. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(4), 508-526. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1940161216652141
Benoit, W. (2007). Communication in Political Campaigns. New York: Peter Lang.
Benoit, W. & Benoit-Bryan, J. (2014). A Functional Analysis of UK Debates in Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales. Western Journal of Communication, 78(5), 653-667. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2013.868032
Benoit, W. & Brazeal, L. (2002). A Functional Analysis of the 1988 Bush-Dukakis Presidential Debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 38(4), 219-233. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2002.11821569
Benoit, W. & Klyukovski, A. A. (2006). A functional analysis of 2004 Ukrainian presidential debates. Argumentation, 20, 209-225. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10503-006-9007-x
Benoit, W. & Wells, W. (1996). Candidates in Conflict: Persuasive Attack and Defense in the 1992 Presidential Debates. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Ben-Porath, E. (2007). Question Bias and Violations of Comparability in Intraparty Debates: Iowa and New Hampshire, 2004. Communication Quarterly, 55(4), 375-396. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/01463370701655974
Birdsell, D. S. (2017). Political campaign debates. In K. Kenski & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication (pp. 165-178). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blumler, J G. (2018) The Crisis of Public Communication, 1995-2017, Javnost - The Public 25(1-2), 83-92. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1418799
Blumler, J. G. & Gurevitch. M. (1995). The Crisis of Public Communication. London: Routledge.
Blumler, J. & Kavanagh, D. (1999). The third age of political communication: Influences and features. Political Communication, 16(3), 209-230. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/105846099198596
Choi, Y.S. & Benoit, W. L. (2013). A Functional Analysis of the 2007 and 2012 French Presidential Debates. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 42(3), 215-227. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2013.827584
Coleman, S. & Ross, K. (2010). The Media and the Public: “Them” and “Us” in Media Discourse. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Dayan, D. & Katz, E. (1992). Media Events. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dragan, N. S. (2016). A semio-functional approach of relationship attacks-defenses for Presidential debates in Romania, from November 2014. Journal of Media Research, 9(2), 36-49. Retrieved from https://www.mrjournal.ro/docs/R2/25JMR3.pdf
Dudek, P. & Partacz, S. (2009). Functional theory of political discourse. Televised debates during the parliamentary campaign in 2007 in Poland. Central European Journal of Communication, 2(3), 367-379. Retrieved from https://www.cejc.ptks.pl/attachments/Functional-theory-of-political-discourse-Televised-debates-during-the-parliamentary-campaign-in-2007-in-Poland_2018-06-05_12-22-52.pdf
Echeverría, M. (2019). La lógica mediática contra la deliberación mediada. El caso de los debates presidenciales. Cuadernos.Info, 45, 57-72. https://www.doi.org/10.7764/cdi.45.1573
Eveland Jr, W. P., McLeod, D. M. & Nathanson, A. (1994). Reporters vs. undecided voters: An analysis of the questions asked during the 1992 presidential debates. Communication Quarterly, 42(4), 390-406. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/01463379409369945
García Marín, J. (2015). La cobertura mediática de los debates electorales en España. Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 38, 135-161. Retrieved from https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/recp/article/view/37666
Gerth, M., Rademacher, P., Pühringer, K., Dahinden, U. & Siegert, G. (2009). Challenges to Political Campaigns in the Media: Commercialization, Framing, and Personalization. Studies in Communication Sciences, 9(1), 149-170. https://www.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-20005
Glantz, M., Benoit, W. & Airne, D. (2013). A functional analysis of 2012 US presidential primary debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 49(4), 275-285. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2013.11821802
Godoy, S. (2016). Media Ownership and Concentration in Chile. In E. Noam (Ed.), Who owns the world’s media? Media Concentration and Ownership Around the World (pp. 641-674). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gómez, C., Allende, S. & García González, A. (2020) Análisis del protocolo de los debates electorales televisados en España. El caso del formato cara a cara. In I. Puentes-Rivera, A.B. Fernández-Souto & M. Vázquez-Gestal (Coords.), Debate sobre los debates electorales y nuevas formas de comunicación política. Cuadernos Artesanos de Comunicación 171 (pp. 99-118). La Laguna: Latina.
Gris Legorreta, P. (2018). Debates presidenciales: la elección del formato y sus implicaciones. Temas Estratégicos 55, Instituto Belisario Domínguez, Senado de la República.
Gronemeyer, M. E. & Porath, W. (2017). Tendencias de la posición editoriales en diarios de referencias en Chile: el arte de dosificar la crítica frente a la actualidad de los actores políticos. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago), 37(1), 177-202. https://www.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2017000100008
Hanitzsch, T. (2011). Populist disseminators, detached watchdogs, critical change agents and opportunist facilitators: Professional milieus, the journalistic field and autonomy in 18 countries. International Communication Gazette, 73(6), 477-494. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1748048511412279
Hanitzsch, T., Hanusch, F., Ramaprasad, J. & de Beer, A. S. (Eds.) (2019). Worlds of Journalism: Comparing Journalistic Cultures Around the Globe. New York: Columbia University Press.
Herrero, J. C. & Benoit, W. L. (2009). Análisis funcional de los debates en las elecciones generales de 2008. Zer-Revista de Estudios de Comunicación, 14(27), 61-81. Retrieved from https://ojs.ehu.eus/index.php/Zer/article/view/2398/2160
Hopmann, D. N., Vliegenthart, R. & Maier, J. (2017). The effects of tone, focus, and incivility in election debates. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 28(3), 283-306. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2017.1394310
Hrbková, L. & Zagrapan, J. (2014). Slovak political debates: Functional theory in a multi-party system. European. Journal of Communication, 29(6), 735-744. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0267323114544864
Isotalus, P. (2011). Analyzing presidential debates. Functional theory and Finnish political Communication Culture. Nordicom Review, 32(1), 31-43. https://www.doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0103
Iyengar, S. (2011). Media politics: A citizen’s guide 2nd Ed. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
Jamieson, K. & Waldman, P. (2003). The press effect. Politicians, journalists, and the stories that shape the political world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lamoureux. E. R., Entrekin, H. & McKinney, M. (1994). Debating the debate. In D.B. Carlin & M.S. McKinney (Eds.), The 1992 presidential debates in focus (pp. 55-67). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Lehrer, J. (2011). Tension city. Inside the presidential debates, from Kennedy-Nixon to Obama-McCain. Random House.
Levy, J. S. (2008). Case Studies: Types, Designs, and Logics of Inference. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 25(1), 1-18. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/07388940701860318
López-García, G., Llorca-Abad, G., Valera-Ordaz, L. & Peris-Blanes, A. (2018). Los debates electorales, ¿el último reducto frente la mediatización? Un estudio de caso de las elecciones generales españolas de 2015. Palabra Clave, 21(3), 772-797. https://www.doi.org/10.5294/ pacla.2018.21.3.6
Maier, J. & Jansen, C. (2015). When do candidates attack in election campaigns? Exploring the determinants of negative candidate messages in German televised debates. Party Politics, 23(5), 549-559. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1354068815610966
Marín Lladó, C. & Pérez Tornero, J. M. (2020). Un modelo conceptual para analizar los debates electorales en TV. Mediatización y ceremonias televisivas. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 76, 229-245. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2020-1445
Matera, F. & Salwen, M. (1996). Unwieldy questions? Circuitous answers? Journalists as panelists in presidential election debates. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40(3), 309-317. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/08838159609364355
Mayol, A. (2019). Big Bang. Estallido social. Modelo derrumbado – sociedad rota – política inútil. Santiago: Catalonia.
Mazzoleni, G. (2010). La comunicación política. Madrid: Alianza.
Mazzoleni, G. & Schulz, W. (1999). “Mediatization” of politics: A challenge for democracy? Political Communication, 16(3), 247-261. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/105846099198613
McKinney, M. & Carlin, D. (2004). Political campaign debates. In L. Kaid (Ed.), Handbook of Political Communication Research (pp. 203-234). London: Routledge
McKinney, M., Rill, L. & Thorson, E. (2013). Civic Engagement Through Presidential Debates: Young Citizens’ Political Attitudes in the 2012 Election. American Behavioral Scientist. 20(5), 1-21. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0002764213515223
Mellado, C. (2015). Professional roles in News Content: Six dimensions of journalistic role performance. Journalism Studies, 16(4), 596-614. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.922276
Mellado, C. & Lagos, C. (2014). Professional roles in news content: Analyzing journalistic performance in the Chilean national press. International Journal of Communication, 8, 2090-2112. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/2651/1191
Mönckeberg, M. O. (2009). Los magnates de la prensa. Concentración de los medios de comunicación en Chile. Santiago: Penguin Random House.
Morello, J. (2005). Questioning the questions: an examination of the “unpredictable” 2004 Bush-Kerry town hall debate. Argumentation and Advocacy, 41, 211-224.
Mujica, M. & Bachmann, I. (2013). Melodramatic Profiles of Chilean Newscasts: The Case of Emotionalization. International Journal of Communication, 7, 1-20. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/2177/971
Nguyen, V. A., Boyd-Graber, J., Resnik, P., Cai, D. A., Midberry, J. E. & Wang, Y. (2014). Modeling topic control to detect influence in conversations using nonparametric topic models. Machine Learning, 95(3), 381-421. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10994-013-5417-9
Núñez-Mussa, E. & Porath, W. (2021). Propuesta y aplicación de un marco para analizar la actuación de los periodistas que conducen debates electorales. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 27(3), 893-908. https://www.doi.org/10.5209/esmp.721521
Otano Garde, R. & Sunkel, G. (2003). Libertad de los periodistas en los medios. Comunicación y Medios, 14, 41-52. https://www.doi.org/10.5354/0716-3991.2003.12099
Patterson, T. E. (1996). Bad news, bad governance. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546(1), 97-108. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0002716296546001009
Ponce, M. (2020). Medios y Gobiernos: Mediatización de actores políticos en Argentina, Chile y Uruguay 2010-2017. Doctoral Thesis. Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.
Porath, W., Mujica, C. & Maldonado, F. (2009). Las noticias extranjeras en la televisión chilena y la emoción de ver actuaciones deportivas nacionales. Comunicación y Pluralismo, 8(2), 29-63. https://www.doi.org/10.36576/summa.29188
Porath, W., Suzuki, J. J., Ramdohr, T. M. & Portales, J. C. (2015). Newspaper coverage of three presidential campaigns in Chile: Personalisation and political strategies. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 34(4), 451-466. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/blar.12366
Porath, W., Ortega Gunckel, C., & Rojas Soto, A. J. (2019). La evolución de los formatos de debates presidenciales en la televisión chilena: 1989-2017: un caso de especiación. Comunicación y Sociedad, e7198, 1-26. https://www.doi.org/10.32870/cys.v2019i0.7198
Quintas-Froufe, N., González-Neira, A. & Conde-Vázquez, E. (2020). El interés de la audiencia española en la política televisada: de los debates electorales al politainment. Communication & Society, 33(3), 85-100. https://www.doi.org/10.15581/003.33.3.85-100
Rahat, G. & Sheafer, T. (2007) The personalization(s) of politics: Israel, 1949–2003. Political Communication, 41(1), 65-80. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10584600601128739
Rowland, R. (2013). The First 2012 Presidential Campaign Debate: The Decline of Reason in Presidential Debates. Communication Studies, 64(5), 528-547. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2013.833530
Schmuck, D., Heiss, R., Matthes, J., Engesser, S. & Esser, F. (2017). Antecedents of strategic game framing in political news coverage. Journalism, 18(8), 937-955. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1464884916648098
Schroeder, A. (2016). Presidential debates. Risky business on the campaign trail. New York: Columbia University Press.
Schroeder, A. (2000). Presidential debates. Forty years of high-risk TV. New York: Columbia University Press.
Strömbäck, J. (2008). Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(3), 228-246. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1940161208319097
Strömbäck, J. & Esser, F. (2014). Making sense of the mediatization of politics. Journalism Studies, 15(3), 243-55. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.889441
Stromer-Galley, J. & Bryant, L. (2011). Agenda control in the 2008 CNN/YouTube debates. Communication Quarterly, 59(5), 529-546. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2011.614212
Téllez, N., Muñiz, C. & Ramírez, J. (2010). The Discourse Function in Televised Debates: A Cross-cultural Study of Political Debates in Mexico, Spain and the United States. Palabra Clave, 13(2), 251-270. https://www.doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2010.13.2.2
Turcotte, T. (2017). Predicting policy: exploring news attention to policy issues in electoral debates, Journal of Applied Communication Research, 45(5), 576-595. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2017.1382709
Turcotte, J. (2015). The news norms and values of presidential debate agendas: An analysis of format and moderator influence on question content. Mass Communication and Society, 18(3), 239-258. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2014.893362
Van der Meer, T. W., Walter, A. & Aelst, P. V. (2016). The contingency of voter learning: how election debates influenced voters’ ability and accuracy to position parties in the 2010 Dutch election campaign. Political Communication, 33(1), 136-157. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2015.1016639
Zamora, R. & Rebolledo, M. (2017). La personalización como recurso estratégico en los debates electorales: el caso del 7-d: el debate decisivo en las elecciones generales de 2015. In P. Vázquez (Ed.), Personalización en comunicación política: de la técnica a la estrategia (pp. 11-37). Sevilla: Egregius.
Zeh, R. & Hopmann, D. (2013). Indicating Mediatization? Two Decades of Election Campaign Television Coverage. European Journal of Communication, 28(3), 225-240. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0267323113475409
Details
Article Details
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.
