William Porath e-mail(Login required) , Constanza Ortega-Gunckel e-mail(Login required) , Enrique Núñez-Mussa e-mail(Login required)

Main Article Content

Authors

William Porath e-mail(Login required)
Constanza Ortega-Gunckel e-mail(Login required)
Enrique Núñez-Mussa e-mail(Login required)

Abstract

319

Within the growing academic interest over electoral debates, the role of the journalists who conduct the debates in determining the tenor of the answers has not been sufficiently studied. We used Chile as an extreme case, given the predominant role that the debate moderators receive here, thanks to the “journalistic panel” format utilized in them, where they take turns to interview the candidates. As a framework to describe these contents, we used Functional Theory of Political Discourse by William Benoit. Our data show that, indeed, the candidates use different combinations of said functions, depending on the different frameworks established by the rules for each debate. Clearly, the candidates tend to defend themselves from the attacks of the journalists, rather than their rivals’; and they use other strategies when the rules allow them more freedom.

Keywords

Electoral debates, role of journalists, watchdog, attacks-defenses, Functional Theory of Political Discourse, Chile

References

Acuña, F., Gutiérrez, S. & Puentes, A. (Eds.) (2007). Los primeros 50 años de la televisión chilena. Santiago de Chile: Facultad Comunicaciones UC/VTR/El Mercurio/Canal 13.

Ajilore, O. O. (2015). Acclaims, attacks and defences in Nigerian gubernatorial debate. Discourse & Communication, 9(1), 3-18. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1750481314555261

Allern, S. & von Sikorski, C. (2018). Political Scandals as a Democratic Challenge: From Important Revelations to Provocations, Trivialities, and Neglect — Introduction. International Journal of Communication, 12(1), 1-10. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/7094/2413

Anstead, N. (2016). A different beast? Televised election debates in parliamentary democracies. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(4), 508-526. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1940161216652141

Benoit, W. (2007). Communication in Political Campaigns. New York: Peter Lang.

Benoit, W. & Benoit-Bryan, J. (2014). A Functional Analysis of UK Debates in Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales. Western Journal of Communication, 78(5), 653-667. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2013.868032

Benoit, W. & Brazeal, L. (2002). A Functional Analysis of the 1988 Bush-Dukakis Presidential Debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 38(4), 219-233. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2002.11821569

Benoit, W. & Klyukovski, A. A. (2006). A functional analysis of 2004 Ukrainian presidential debates. Argumentation, 20, 209-225. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10503-006-9007-x

Benoit, W. & Wells, W. (1996). Candidates in Conflict: Persuasive Attack and Defense in the 1992 Presidential Debates. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

Ben-Porath, E. (2007). Question Bias and Violations of Comparability in Intraparty Debates: Iowa and New Hampshire, 2004. Communication Quarterly, 55(4), 375-396. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/01463370701655974

Birdsell, D. S. (2017). Political campaign debates. In K. Kenski & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication (pp. 165-178). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Blumler, J G. (2018) The Crisis of Public Communication, 1995-2017, Javnost - The Public 25(1-2), 83-92. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1418799

Blumler, J. G. & Gurevitch. M. (1995). The Crisis of Public Communication. London: Routledge.

Blumler, J. & Kavanagh, D. (1999). The third age of political communication: Influences and features. Political Communication, 16(3), 209-230. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/105846099198596

Choi, Y.S. & Benoit, W. L. (2013). A Functional Analysis of the 2007 and 2012 French Presidential Debates. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 42(3), 215-227. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2013.827584

Coleman, S. & Ross, K. (2010). The Media and the Public: “Them” and “Us” in Media Discourse. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Dayan, D. & Katz, E. (1992). Media Events. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Dragan, N. S. (2016). A semio-functional approach of relationship attacks-defenses for Presidential debates in Romania, from November 2014. Journal of Media Research, 9(2), 36-49. Retrieved from https://www.mrjournal.ro/docs/R2/25JMR3.pdf

Dudek, P. & Partacz, S. (2009). Functional theory of political discourse. Televised debates during the parliamentary campaign in 2007 in Poland. Central European Journal of Communication, 2(3), 367-379. Retrieved from https://www.cejc.ptks.pl/attachments/Functional-theory-of-political-discourse-Televised-debates-during-the-parliamentary-campaign-in-2007-in-Poland_2018-06-05_12-22-52.pdf

Echeverría, M. (2019). La lógica mediática contra la deliberación mediada. El caso de los debates presidenciales. Cuadernos.Info, 45, 57-72. https://www.doi.org/10.7764/cdi.45.1573

Eveland Jr, W. P., McLeod, D. M. & Nathanson, A. (1994). Reporters vs. undecided voters: An analysis of the questions asked during the 1992 presidential debates. Communication Quarterly, 42(4), 390-406. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/01463379409369945

García Marín, J. (2015). La cobertura mediática de los debates electorales en España. Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 38, 135-161. Retrieved from https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/recp/article/view/37666

Gerth, M., Rademacher, P., Pühringer, K., Dahinden, U. & Siegert, G. (2009). Challenges to Political Campaigns in the Media: Commercialization, Framing, and Personalization. Studies in Communication Sciences, 9(1), 149-170. https://www.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-20005

Glantz, M., Benoit, W. & Airne, D. (2013). A functional analysis of 2012 US presidential primary debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 49(4), 275-285. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2013.11821802

Godoy, S. (2016). Media Ownership and Concentration in Chile. In E. Noam (Ed.), Who owns the world’s media? Media Concentration and Ownership Around the World (pp. 641-674). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gómez, C., Allende, S. & García González, A. (2020) Análisis del protocolo de los debates electorales televisados en España. El caso del formato cara a cara. In I. Puentes-Rivera, A.B. Fernández-Souto & M. Vázquez-Gestal (Coords.), Debate sobre los debates electorales y nuevas formas de comunicación política. Cuadernos Artesanos de Comunicación 171 (pp. 99-118). La Laguna: Latina.

Gris Legorreta, P. (2018). Debates presidenciales: la elección del formato y sus implicaciones. Temas Estratégicos 55, Instituto Belisario Domínguez, Senado de la República.

Gronemeyer, M. E. & Porath, W. (2017). Tendencias de la posición editoriales en diarios de referencias en Chile: el arte de dosificar la crítica frente a la actualidad de los actores políticos. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago), 37(1), 177-202. https://www.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2017000100008

Hanitzsch, T. (2011). Populist disseminators, detached watchdogs, critical change agents and opportunist facilitators: Professional milieus, the journalistic field and autonomy in 18 countries. International Communication Gazette, 73(6), 477-494. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1748048511412279

Hanitzsch, T., Hanusch, F., Ramaprasad, J. & de Beer, A. S. (Eds.) (2019). Worlds of Journalism: Comparing Journalistic Cultures Around the Globe. New York: Columbia University Press.

Herrero, J. C. & Benoit, W. L. (2009). Análisis funcional de los debates en las elecciones generales de 2008. Zer-Revista de Estudios de Comunicación, 14(27), 61-81. Retrieved from https://ojs.ehu.eus/index.php/Zer/article/view/2398/2160

Hopmann, D. N., Vliegenthart, R. & Maier, J. (2017). The effects of tone, focus, and incivility in election debates. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 28(3), 283-306. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2017.1394310

Hrbková, L. & Zagrapan, J. (2014). Slovak political debates: Functional theory in a multi-party system. European. Journal of Communication, 29(6), 735-744. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0267323114544864

Isotalus, P. (2011). Analyzing presidential debates. Functional theory and Finnish political Communication Culture. Nordicom Review, 32(1), 31-43. https://www.doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0103

Iyengar, S. (2011). Media politics: A citizen’s guide 2nd Ed. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.

Jamieson, K. & Waldman, P. (2003). The press effect. Politicians, journalists, and the stories that shape the political world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lamoureux. E. R., Entrekin, H. & McKinney, M. (1994). Debating the debate. In D.B. Carlin & M.S. McKinney (Eds.), The 1992 presidential debates in focus (pp. 55-67). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Lehrer, J. (2011). Tension city. Inside the presidential debates, from Kennedy-Nixon to Obama-McCain. Random House.

Levy, J. S. (2008). Case Studies: Types, Designs, and Logics of Inference. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 25(1), 1-18. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/07388940701860318

López-García, G., Llorca-Abad, G., Valera-Ordaz, L. & Peris-Blanes, A. (2018). Los debates electorales, ¿el último reducto frente la mediatización? Un estudio de caso de las elecciones generales españolas de 2015. Palabra Clave, 21(3), 772-797. https://www.doi.org/10.5294/ pacla.2018.21.3.6

Maier, J. & Jansen, C. (2015). When do candidates attack in election campaigns? Exploring the determinants of negative candidate messages in German televised debates. Party Politics, 23(5), 549-559. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1354068815610966

Marín Lladó, C. & Pérez Tornero, J. M. (2020). Un modelo conceptual para analizar los debates electorales en TV. Mediatización y ceremonias televisivas. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 76, 229-245. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2020-1445

Matera, F. & Salwen, M. (1996). Unwieldy questions? Circuitous answers? Journalists as panelists in presidential election debates. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40(3), 309-317. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/08838159609364355

Mayol, A. (2019). Big Bang. Estallido social. Modelo derrumbado – sociedad rota – política inútil. Santiago: Catalonia.

Mazzoleni, G. (2010). La comunicación política. Madrid: Alianza.

Mazzoleni, G. & Schulz, W. (1999). “Mediatization” of politics: A challenge for democracy? Political Communication, 16(3), 247-261. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/105846099198613

McKinney, M. & Carlin, D. (2004). Political campaign debates. In L. Kaid (Ed.), Handbook of Political Communication Research (pp. 203-234). London: Routledge

McKinney, M., Rill, L. & Thorson, E. (2013). Civic Engagement Through Presidential Debates: Young Citizens’ Political Attitudes in the 2012 Election. American Behavioral Scientist. 20(5), 1-21. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0002764213515223

Mellado, C. (2015). Professional roles in News Content: Six dimensions of journalistic role performance. Journalism Studies, 16(4), 596-614. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.922276

Mellado, C. & Lagos, C. (2014). Professional roles in news content: Analyzing journalistic performance in the Chilean national press. International Journal of Communication, 8, 2090-2112. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/2651/1191

Mönckeberg, M. O. (2009). Los magnates de la prensa. Concentración de los medios de comunicación en Chile. Santiago: Penguin Random House.

Morello, J. (2005). Questioning the questions: an examination of the “unpredictable” 2004 Bush-Kerry town hall debate. Argumentation and Advocacy, 41, 211-224.

Mujica, M. & Bachmann, I. (2013). Melodramatic Profiles of Chilean Newscasts: The Case of Emotionalization. International Journal of Communication, 7, 1-20. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/2177/971

Nguyen, V. A., Boyd-Graber, J., Resnik, P., Cai, D. A., Midberry, J. E. & Wang, Y. (2014). Modeling topic control to detect influence in conversations using nonparametric topic models. Machine Learning, 95(3), 381-421. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10994-013-5417-9

Núñez-Mussa, E. & Porath, W. (2021). Propuesta y aplicación de un marco para analizar la actuación de los periodistas que conducen debates electorales. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 27(3), 893-908. https://www.doi.org/10.5209/esmp.721521

Otano Garde, R. & Sunkel, G. (2003). Libertad de los periodistas en los medios. Comunicación y Medios, 14, 41-52. https://www.doi.org/10.5354/0716-3991.2003.12099

Patterson, T. E. (1996). Bad news, bad governance. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546(1), 97-108. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0002716296546001009

Ponce, M. (2020). Medios y Gobiernos: Mediatización de actores políticos en Argentina, Chile y Uruguay 2010-2017. Doctoral Thesis. Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.

Porath, W., Mujica, C. & Maldonado, F. (2009). Las noticias extranjeras en la televisión chilena y la emoción de ver actuaciones deportivas nacionales. Comunicación y Pluralismo, 8(2), 29-63. https://www.doi.org/10.36576/summa.29188

Porath, W., Suzuki, J. J., Ramdohr, T. M. & Portales, J. C. (2015). Newspaper coverage of three presidential campaigns in Chile: Personalisation and political strategies. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 34(4), 451-466. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/blar.12366

Porath, W., Ortega Gunckel, C., & Rojas Soto, A. J. (2019). La evolución de los formatos de debates presidenciales en la televisión chilena: 1989-2017: un caso de especiación. Comunicación y Sociedad, e7198, 1-26. https://www.doi.org/10.32870/cys.v2019i0.7198

Quintas-Froufe, N., González-Neira, A. & Conde-Vázquez, E. (2020). El interés de la audiencia española en la política televisada: de los debates electorales al politainment. Communication & Society, 33(3), 85-100. https://www.doi.org/10.15581/003.33.3.85-100

Rahat, G. & Sheafer, T. (2007) The personalization(s) of politics: Israel, 1949–2003. Political Communication, 41(1), 65-80. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10584600601128739

Rowland, R. (2013). The First 2012 Presidential Campaign Debate: The Decline of Reason in Presidential Debates. Communication Studies, 64(5), 528-547. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2013.833530

Schmuck, D., Heiss, R., Matthes, J., Engesser, S. & Esser, F. (2017). Antecedents of strategic game framing in political news coverage. Journalism, 18(8), 937-955. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1464884916648098

Schroeder, A. (2016). Presidential debates. Risky business on the campaign trail. New York: Columbia University Press.

Schroeder, A. (2000). Presidential debates. Forty years of high-risk TV. New York: Columbia University Press.

Strömbäck, J. (2008). Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(3), 228-246. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1940161208319097

Strömbäck, J. & Esser, F. (2014). Making sense of the mediatization of politics. Journalism Studies, 15(3), 243-55. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.889441

Stromer-Galley, J. & Bryant, L. (2011). Agenda control in the 2008 CNN/YouTube debates. Communication Quarterly, 59(5), 529-546. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2011.614212

Téllez, N., Muñiz, C. & Ramírez, J. (2010). The Discourse Function in Televised Debates: A Cross-cultural Study of Political Debates in Mexico, Spain and the United States. Palabra Clave, 13(2), 251-270. https://www.doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2010.13.2.2

Turcotte, T. (2017). Predicting policy: exploring news attention to policy issues in electoral debates, Journal of Applied Communication Research, 45(5), 576-595. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2017.1382709

Turcotte, J. (2015). The news norms and values of presidential debate agendas: An analysis of format and moderator influence on question content. Mass Communication and Society, 18(3), 239-258. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2014.893362

Van der Meer, T. W., Walter, A. & Aelst, P. V. (2016). The contingency of voter learning: how election debates influenced voters’ ability and accuracy to position parties in the 2010 Dutch election campaign. Political Communication, 33(1), 136-157. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2015.1016639

Zamora, R. & Rebolledo, M. (2017). La personalización como recurso estratégico en los debates electorales: el caso del 7-d: el debate decisivo en las elecciones generales de 2015. In P. Vázquez (Ed.), Personalización en comunicación política: de la técnica a la estrategia (pp. 11-37). Sevilla: Egregius.

Zeh, R. & Hopmann, D. (2013). Indicating Mediatization? Two Decades of Election Campaign Television Coverage. European Journal of Communication, 28(3), 225-240. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0267323113475409

Metrics





Search GoogleScholar


Details

Article Details

Section
Articles