The impact of self-centered factors on skepticism towards CSR claims during large-scale external crises
Article Sidebar
157)How to Cite
277
Abstract
External crises create opportunities to strengthen companies’ commitment to society through CSR claims; however, consumers often perceive them as opportunistic. This study leverages the unique setting of COVID-19 to determine the power of consumer self-centered factors (i.e., concern about the crisis, personal impact, and political ideology) to predict situational skepticism towards CSR communication during a large-scale external crisis. An online survey of 1,000 consumers, analyzed using structural equation modeling, revealed that self-centered variables are key determinants to predict skepticism during external events. This effect is mediated by the inferential process of attributing motives. Their predictive power is consistent across the four CSR domains (i.e., customer, environment, employees, philanthropy). This study moves forward on the egocentric pattern projection and the attribution theories by addressing reactive CSR to external crises, a type of crisis that has been overlooked, and supports managerial decisions to mitigate CSR skepticism for potential external crises to come.
References
Antonetti, P. & Anesa, M. (2017). Consumer reactions to corporate tax strategies: The role of political ideology. Journal of Business Research, 74, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.12.011
Asper, M., Osika, W., Dalman, C., Pöllänen, E., Simonsson, O., Flodin, P., ”¦, & Niemi, M. E. (2022). Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and previous pandemics, epidemics and economic crises on mental health: systematic review. BJPsych Open, 8(6), e181. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2022.587
Bae, M. (2018). Overcoming skepticism toward cause-related marketing claims: the role of consumers’ attributions and a temporary state of skepticism. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 35(2), 194-207. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-06-2016-1827
Batra, R. (2019). Creating Brand Meaning: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(3), 535-546. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1122
Becker-Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, B. A., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.01.001
Chandler, D. (2016). Strategic corporate social responsibility. SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/strategic-corporate-social-responsibility/book258527
Connors, S., Anderson-MacDonald, S., & Thomson, M. (2017). Overcoming the ‘Window Dressing’ effect: Mitigating the negative effects of inherent skepticism towards corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(3), 599-621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2858-z
Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational Crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(3), 163-176. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049
Coombs, W. T. & Holladay, S. J. (1996). Communication and attributions in a crisis: An experimental study in crisis communication. Journal of Public Relations Research, 8(4), 279-295. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532754XJPRR0804_04
Cristòfol, F. J., Eugenio-Vela, J. de S., & Paniagua-Rojano, F. J. (2020). Active listening in the management of crisis communication: Case study of the 2017 terrorist attack in Barcelona. Communication and Society, 33(4), 61-74. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.33.4.61-74
Critcher, C. R. & Dunning, D. (2009). Egocentric pattern projection: How implicit personality theories recapitulate the geography of the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015670
Dawkins, J. & Lewis, S. (2003). CSR in stakeholder expectations: And their implication for company strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2-3), 185-193. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023399732720
Do Paço, A. M. F. & Reis, R. (2012). Factors affecting skepticism toward green advertising. Journal of Advertising, 41(4), 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2012.10672463
Dunning, D. & Hayes, A. F. (1996). Evidence for egocentric comparison in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 213-229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.213
Farache, F. & Perks, K. J. (2010). CSR advertisements: A legitimacy tool? Corporate Communica-tions: An International Journal, 15(3), 235-248. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563281011068104
Farooq, M., Farooq, O., & Jasimuddin, S. M. (2014). Employees response to corporate social responsibility: Exploring the role of employees’ collectivist orientation. European Management Journal, 32(6), 916-927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2014.03.002
Friestad, M. & Wright, P. (1994). The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1086/209380
García-De los Salmones, M. del M. & Pérez, A. (2018). Effectiveness of CSR advertising: The role of reputation, consumer attributions, and emotions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(2), 194-208. https://doi.org/10.1002/CSR.1453
Geiger, N., Gore, A., Squire, C. V., & Attari, S. Z. (2021). Investigating similarities and differences in individual reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic and the climate crisis. Climate Change, 167(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03143-8
Gillani, A., Kutaula, S., Leonidou, L. C., & Christodoulides, P. (2021). The impact of proximity on consumer fair trade engagement and purchasing behavior: The moderating role of empathic concern and hypocrisy. Journal of Business Ethics, 169, 557-577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04278-6
Grau, S. L. & Folse, J. A. G. (2007). Cause-related marketing (CRM) the influence of donation proximity and message-framing cues on the less-involved consumer. Journal of Advertising, 36(4), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367360402
Groza, M. D., Pronschinske, M. R., & Walker, M. (2011). Perceived organizational motives and consumer responses to proactive and reactive CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(4), 639-652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0834-9
Gupta, A., Briscoe, F., & Hambrick, D. C. (2017). Red, blue, and purple firms: Organizational political ideology and corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management Journal, 38(5), 1018-1040. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2550
Ham, C. D. & Kim, J. (2020). The effects of CSR communication in corporate crises: Examining the role of dispositional and situational CSR skepticism in context. Public Relations Review, 46(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.05.013
Hastie, R. (1984). Causes and effects of causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1), 44-56. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.44
Janssen, C., Swaen, V., & Du, S. (2022). Is a specific claim always better? The double-edged effects of claim specificity in green advertising. Journal of Business Research, 151, 435-447. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.07.005
Jasinenko, A., Christandl, F., & Meynhardt, T. (2020). Justified by ideology: Why conservatives care less about corporate social irresponsibility. Journal of Business Research, 114, 290-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.006
Ji, Y. G., Tao, W., & Rim, H. (2022). Theoretical insights of CSR research in communication from 1980 to 2018: A bibliometric network analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 177, 327-349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04748-w
Jong, W. (2020). Evaluating crisis communication. A 30-item checklist for assessing performance during COVID-19 and other pandemics. Journal of Health Communication, 25(12), 962-970. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2021.1871791
Jost, J. T. (2017). The marketplace of ideology: “Elective affinities” in political psychology and their implications for consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(4), 502-520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2017.07.003
Kim, J., Oh, H. J., & Ham, C.-D. (2021). The impact of the CSR-embedded crisis response: The role of values congruence between leadership styles and CSR motives. Management Communication Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189211025322
Kim, S. & Choi, S. M. (2018). Congruence effects in post-crisis CSR communication: The mediating role of attribution of corporate motives. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(2), 447-463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3425-y
Lantos, G. P. (2001). The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 595-630. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760110410281
Lasarov, W., Mai, R., Krause, J. S., Schmidt, U., & Hoffmann, S. (2021). Too cold to be skeptical: How ambient temperature moderates the effects of CSR communication. Ecological Economics, 183, 106943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106943
Lee, K. (2020). Consumer skepticism about quick service restaurants’ corporate social responsibility activities. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 23(5), 417-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/15378020.2020.1780187
Lee, T. H. & Comello, M. L. (Nori) G. (2018). Transparency and industry stigmatization in strategic CSR communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 33(1), 68-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318918807566
Leonidou, C. N. & Skarmeas, D. (2017). Gray shades of green: Causes and consequences of green skepticism. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(2), 401-415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2829-4
Lerbinger, O. (2012). The crisis manager : Facing disasters, conflicts, and failures. In The Crisis Manager (2nd Ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203222133
Lock, I. & Schulz-Knappe, C. (2019). Credible corporate social responsibility (CSR) communica-tion predicts legitimacy: Evidence from an experimental study. Corporate Communications, 24(1), 2-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-07-2018-0071
Lucas, B. & Landman, T. (2020). Social listening, modern slavery, and COVID-19. Journal of Risk Research, 24(3-4), 314-334. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1864009
Luoma-aho, V., Moreno, A., & Verhoeven, P. (2017). Crisis response strategies in Finland and Spain. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 25(4), 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12163
Malle, B. F. (2011). Attribution theories: How people make sense of behavior. In D. Chadee (Ed.), Theories in social psychology (pp. 72-95). Wiley Blackwell. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-20402-003
Martin, B. A. S., Lang, B., & Wong, S. (2003). Conclusion explicitness in advertising: The moderating role of need for cognition (nfc) and argument quality (aq) on persuasion. Journal of Advertising, 32(4), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2003.10639148
Matthes, J. (2019). Uncharted territory in research on environmental advertising: Toward an organizing framework. Journal of Advertising, 48(1), 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2019.1579687
Matthes, J. & Wonneberger, A. (2014). The skeptical green consumer revisited: Testing the relationship between green consumerism and skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Advertising, 43(2), 115-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.834804
Mencl, J. & May, D. R. (2009). The effects of proximity and empathy on ethical decision-making: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 201-226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9765-5
Morsing, M. & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-8608.2006.00460.X
Obermiller, C. & Spangenberg, E. R. (2000). On the origin and distinctness of skepticism toward advertising. Marketing Letters, 11(4), 311-322. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008181028040
Öberseder, M., Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Gruber, V. (2011). “Why don’t consumers care about CSR?”: A qualitative study exploring the role of CSR in consumption decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(4), 449-460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0925-7
Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., & DeMarree, K. C. (2007). The Meta-Cognitive Model (MCM) of attitudes: Implications for attitude measurement, change, and strength. Social Cognition, 25(5), 657-686. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.657
Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (2019). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. In Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429502156/ATTITUDES-PERSUASION-RICHARD-PETTY-JOHN-CACIOPPO
Pomering, A. & Johnson, L. W. (2009). Advertising corporate social responsibility initiatives to communicate corporate image: Inhibiting scepticism to enhance persuasion. Corporate Communications, 14(4), 420-439. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280910998763
Porter, M. E. & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. How to reinvent capitalism - and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. In G. G. Lenssen & N. C. Smith (Eds.), Managing Sustainable Business (pp. 323-346). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1144-7_16
Puzakova, M., Kwak, H., & Taylor, C. R. (2013). The role of geography of self in “filling in” brand personality traits: Consumer inference of unobservable attributes. Journal of Advertising, 42(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2012.748632
Ramasamy, S., Dara Singh, K. S., Amran, A., & Nejati, M. (2020). Linking human values to consumer CSR perception: The moderating role of consumer skepticism. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1958-1971. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1939
Raziq, M. M., Ahmed, Q. M., Ahmad, M., Yusaf, S., Sajjad, A., & Waheed, S. (2018). Advertising skepticism, need for cognition and consumers’ attitudes. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 36(6), 678-693. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-11-2017-0273
Reed, A., Aquino, K., & Levy, E. (2018). Moral identity and judgments of charitable behaviors. Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 178-193. https://doi.org/10.1509/JMKG.71.1.178
Reich, B. J. & Soule, C. A. A. (2016). Green demarketing in advertisements: Comparing “Buy Green” and “Buy Less” appeals in product and institutional advertising contexts. Journal of Advertising, 45(4), 441-458. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1214649
Rifon, N. J., Choi, S. M., Trimble, C. S., & Li, H. (2004). Congruence effects in sponsorship: The mediating role of sponsor credibility and consumer attributions of sponsor motive. Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 30-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2004.10639151
Rim, H. & Ferguson, M. A. T. (2020). Proactive versus reactive CSR in a crisis: An impression management perspective. International Journal of Business Communication, 57(4), 545-568. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488417719835
Rim, H. & Kim, S. (2016). Dimensions of corporate social responsibility (CSR) skepticism and their impacts on public evaluations toward CSR. Journal of Public Relations Research, 28(5-6), 248-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2016.1261702
Romani, S. & Grappi, S. (2014). How companies’ good deeds encourage consumers to adopt pro-social behavior. European Journal of Marketing, 48(5-6), 943-963. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-06-2012-0364
Romani, S., Grappi, S., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2016). Corporate socially responsible initiatives and their effects on consumption of green products. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(2), 253-264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2485-0
Russell, D. W. & Russell, C. A. (2010). Here or there? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility initiatives: Egocentric tendencies and their moderators. Marketing Letters, 21(1), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-009-9082-5
Schaefer, S. D., Terlutter, R., & Diehl, S. (2020). Talking about CSR matters: Employees’ perception of and reaction to their company’s CSR communication in four different CSR domains. International Journal of Advertising, 39(2), 191-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1593736
Skarmeas, D. & Leonidou, C. N. (2013). When consumers doubt, watch out! The role of CSR skepticism. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1831-1838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.004
Snelson-Powell, A. C., Grosvold, J., & Millington, A. I. (2020). Organizational hypocrisy in business schools with sustainability commitments: The drivers of talk-action incon-sistency. Journal of Business Research, 114(September 2019), 408-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.021
Sobande, F. (2020). ‘We’re all in this together’: Commodified notions of connection, care and community in brand responses to COVID-19. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(6), 1033-1037. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549420932294
Sohaib, M., Hui, P., Akram, U., Akram, Z., & Bilal, M. (2018). How non-economic motivations affect electronic word-of-mouth: Evidence from Chinese social media. International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management, 10(4), 311-332. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISCM.2018.098392
Taylor, C. R. (2020). Advertising and COVID-19. International Journal of Advertising, 39(5), 587-589. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2020.1774131
Teona, G., Ko, E., & Kim, S. J. (2020). Environmental claims in online video advertising: effects for fast-fashion and luxury brands. International Journal of Advertising, 39(6), 858-887. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1644144
Thomas, S. & Kureshi, S. (2020). Consumer skepticism towards cause related marketing: exploring the consumer tendency to question from emerging market perspective. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 17(2), 225-236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-020-00244-5
Van Holm, E. J., Monaghan, J., Shahar, D. C., Messina, J., & Surprenant, C. (2020). The impact of political ideology on concern and behavior during COVID-19. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3573224
Van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2-3), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023331212247
Verhoeven, P., Tench, R., Zerfass, A., Moreno, A., & Verčič, D. (2014). Crisis? What crisis?: How European professionals handle crises and crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 40(1), 107-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PUBREV.2013.10.010
Verk, N., Golob, U., & Podnar, K. (2021). A dynamic review of the emergence of corporate social responsibility communication. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(3), 491-515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04232-6
Wei, L. & Kim, N. (2021). Attenuating public skepticism: Effects of pre-crisis corporate engagement and post-crisis CSR initiatives on corporate evaluations. Public Relations Review, 47(1), 101999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101999
Werther, W. B. & Chandler, D. (2005). Strategic corporate social responsibility as global brand insurance. Business Horizons, 48(4), 317-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2004.11.009
Westermann, A. & Forthmann, J. (2021). Social listening: a potential game changer in reputation management How big data analysis can contribute to understanding stakeholders’ views on organisations. Corporate Communications, 26(1), 2-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-01-2020-0028
Yang, H. T. & Yen, G. F. (2018). Consumer responses to corporate cause-related marketing: A serial multiple mediator model of self-construal, empathy and moral identity. European Journal of Marketing, 52(9-10), 2105-2127. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-07-2017-0468
Yang, J. & Mundel, J. (2021). “Are we all in this together?”: Brand opportunism in COVID-19 cause related marketing and the moderating role of consumer skepticism. Journal of Promotion Management, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2021.1888181
Yu, J. (2020). Consumer responses toward green advertising: The effects of gender, advertising skepticism, and green motive attribution. Journal of Marketing Communications, 26(4), 414-433. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2018.1514317
Section
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communicaton & Society, the AUTHOR grants exclusive economic and/or exploitation rights: reproduction, distribution, public communication, transformation/translation/creation of derivative works, and commercialisation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal period in force -the author's lifetime and seventy years after his or her death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future publishing modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication, this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.