Who we are

 

Editorial Board

Director/Editor
Ignacio Arellano, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona (España)

Secretary
J. Enrique Duarte, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona (España)

Vocals
Enrica Cancelliere, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo (Italia)
Celsa Carmen García Valdés, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona (España)
Kim Chon Jin, Seoul National University, Seúl (Korea del Sur)
Santiago Fernández Mosquera, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela (España)
Arnulfo Herrera, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México D.F. (México)
Vibha Maurya, University of Delhi, Nueva Delhi (India)
Robin Ann Rice, Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla, Puebla (México)
Christoph Strosetzki, Universität Münster, Münster (Alemania)
Martina Vinatea, Universidad del Pacífico, Lima (Perú)

Honorary Board
Edmond Cros, Universitè Paul Valéry (Montpellier III), Montpellier (Francia)
James O. Crosby, Florida International University, Miami (Estados Unidos)
Cristóbal Cuevas, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga (España)
Víctor García de la Concha, Real Academia Española, Madrid (España)
Fernando González Ollé, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona (España)
Alessandro Martinengo, Università degli Studi di Pisa, Pisa (Italia)
Roger Moore, St. Thomas University, Fredericton (Canadá)
Rosa Navarro Durán, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona (España)
José Mª Pozuelo Yvancos, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia (España)
Maria Grazia Profeti, Università degli Studi Firenze, Florencia (Italia)
Augustín Redondo, Université de la Sorbonne Nouvelle (Paris III), París (Francia)
Elías L. Rivers, Suny at Stony Brook, Stony Brook (Estados Unidos)
Marie Roig Miranda, Nancy II Université, Nancy (Francia)
Gonzalo Sobejano, Columbia University, Nueva York (Estados Unidos)
Carlos Vaíllo, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona (España)
Darío Villanueva, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela (España)

Advisory Board

Antonio Azaustre Galiana, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela (España)
Alain Bégue, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers (Francia)
Mercedes Blanco, Université de Paris Sorbonne (Paris IV), París (Francia)
Esther Borrego Gutiérrez, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid (España)
Carlos Cabanillas, Universidad de Tromso, Tromso (Noruega)
Rodrigo Cacho, University of Cambridge, Cambridge (Inglaterra)
Manuel Ángel Candelas, Universidad de Vigo, Vigo (España)
Jessica Castro, Universidad de Chile, Santiago de Chile (Chile)
Lara Escudero Baztán, Durham University, Durham (Inglaterra)
Henry Ettinghausen, University of Southampton, Southampton (Reino Unido)
Judith Farré Vidal, Centro Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid (España)
Rafael González Cañal, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real (España)
Sagrario López Poza, Universidad de la Coruña, La Coruña (España)
Elena Marcello, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real (España)
Jesús Menéndez Peláez, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo (España)
Valentina Nider, Università degli Studi Di Trento, Trento (Italia)
Felipe B. Pedraza, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real (España)
Isabel Pérez Cuenca, Universidad San Pablo-Ceu, Madrid (España)
Fernando Plata Parga, Colgate University, Nueva York (Estados Unidos)
Jesús Ponce Cárdenas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid (España)
Alfonso Rey, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela (España)
Milagros Rodríguez Cáceres, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real (España)
Fernando Rodríguez Mansilla, Hobart and Wiliam Smith College, Geneva (Estados Unidos)
Victoriano Roncero López, Stony Brook University, Nueva York (Estados Unidos)
Mª José Tobar Quintanar, Dpto. de Lengua y Literatura castellana, CPI Camiño de Santiago, Pedrouzo - O Pino, La Coruña (España)
Ramón Valdés, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona (España)

Contact

 

Editorial Office

Revista La Perinola - GRISO
Edificio Ismael Sánchez Bella
Universidad de Navarra
31009 Pamplona (Navarra)
SPAIN
eduarte@unav.es
@LaPerinola_unav
Tel.: (+34) 948 425 600 * Ext. 802011

Manuscripts should be submitted through our online submission system. Please do not send complete manuscripts by e-mail.

Publishing Office

Publication-related enquiries and Rights and Permissions enquiries
For any general pre-submission queries, including e.g. article types, indexing, timeline; for queries related to journal publishing or permission requests to reuse or reprint content, and for requesting author or reviewer certificates, please contact:
Mercedes Alonso de Diego
malonsod@unav.es
Tel.: (+34) 948 425 600 * Ext. 803102

Submission-related enquiries
Queries about submission issues, peer review process, publishing costs and APCs, or the status of your manuscript and queries about accepted manuscripts in production or post-publication corrections should be sent to:
Rafael Heredero Ordoyo
rhereder@unav.es
Tel.: (+34) 948 425 600 * Ext. 803155

Subscriptions
Queries about subscriptions or Individual issues should be sent to:
Esther Marín Murugarren
emarinm@unav.es
Tel.: (+34) 948 425 600 * Ext. 802626

Production

For related enquiries about printing process
Ana Castro
Commercial Director
Printhaus
Edificio Arzubi de Bolueta
Ctra. Bilbao-Galdakao, 18, 2º pta.
48400 Bilbao (Bizkaia)
SPAIN
a.castro@printhaus.es
Tel.: (+34) 944 010 100
Tel.: (+34) 944 054 160

For related enquiries about layout process
Clara Arellano Torres
Calle Sangüesa 25, 1ºB
31005 Pamplona (Navarra)
SPAIN
holaclabel@gmail.com

Focus and Scope

La Perinola de Quevedo is probably the sharpest, fiercest work of literary criticism ever written. The name La Perinola: Revista de Investigación Quevediana is a tribute to the shrewdness (if not the ferocity) of Francisco de Quevedo.

It is intended to be a journal for critical review in its broadest sense, open to all articles that take any approach or perspective, provided that they contribute to a better understanding of a vast, varied, controversial and undoubtedly commendable body of work that is worthy, in our view, of its own journal.

La Perinola was conceived from the outset as a network for communication between Quevedo scholars who want to work together towards common aims and create a tool in the service of everyone, especially of Francisco de Quevedo and his works.

Its basic prerequisites are openness and academic rigor.

It will be accompanied by a series of appendices that will accept publications and studies that are in any way related to Quevedo. The first (Ocho poemas satíricos de Quevedo, by Fernando Plata) has already been released ahead of the journal itself, for editorial reasons. The invitation to contribute to La Perinola also applies to the series of appendices.

La Perinola is just beginning its journey, and we hope that, with everyone’s help, it has a long road ahead of it and that it manages to be both useful and enjoyable.

Free yourself, dear reader, of long prefaces and poor epithets.

Section Policies

La Perinola is divided in three sections: Articles; Varia; and Book Reviews.

Contributions submitted Articles and Varia will be subject to peer review.

If you want to send a paper to the journal, please check the Instructions for Authors.

Open access policy

La Perinola provides open access to all published content -except the last two volumes, with two years of embargo, to facilitate its dissemination and promote research, supporting an exchange of knowledge.

Anti-plagiarism policy

To ensure the originality of the manuscripts, the journal will use the Turnitin anti-plagiarism tool.

The similarity assessment criteria will always be subject to the decision of the Editorial Committee. Each case will be considered individually. Depending on the type of plagiarism detected, the author will be informed to correct his errors or actions, or his manuscript will be irrevocably rejected. 

The control of possible plagiarism will be carried out before the peer review begins.

 

Preservation policy

This journal carries out preservation processes through the PKP PLN tool that allows preserving the Journal’s content regardless of where it is hosted. It uses the distributed preservation network model used by a LOCKSS Private Network supported by the organizational commitment of PKP partners and sponsors who are also members of the LOCKSS alliance. More information at https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/2254-6359

Complementarily, the Journal’s issues and articles are stored on external hard drives and digital data storage (cloud storage).

Interoperability protocol

This journal provides an interface OAI-PMH (Open Archives Initiative – Protocol for Metadata Harvesting) that allows other websites and information services to harvest the published content metadata.

Specifications:
OAI-PMH Protocol Version 2.0
Dublin Core Metadata

URL for harvesters:
https://revistas.unav.edu/index.php/la-perinola/oai

Publication Fees

La Perinola does not charge authors any fee for submission of manuscripts or publication of articles.

Publication Frequency

La Perinola publishes one volume a year, each june.

Peer review process

Once texts have been received, two members of the editorial board will conduct an initial review of the academic quality and compliance with the formal requirements of the journal. Within one to three months, authors will be informed of whether or not their article will proceed to an external review.

If the result is favorable, it will be sent, together with a questionnaire, to two external referees who will assess its academic quality. These referees will be unaware of the author's identity and vice versa. The referees' possible decisions are: a) To accept the work unconditionally; b) To accept it if revisions are made; c) To reconsider it if revisions are made; d) To reject it. In the event of disagreements between the referees, the work will be sent to a third party whose decision will be binding. It is not possible to appeal against the final decision.

When authors are asked to make modifications to articles, they will have 15 days in which to do so.

Instructions to reviewers

Double-blind anonymous review by independent experts is a benchmark for journals of the highest academic quality. The editorial board will take your comments into account before making a decision on whether to publish the paper we have sent you. If you feel there are any reasons preventing you from carrying out an anonymous, independent and fair assessment of the article, please notify us.

We guarantee the confidentiality of authors and reviewers. The article we are submitting to you for review is a private document. Please do not disclose it to third parties or reveal its contents to others unless it is published. Your review will also be treated confidentially. We will only communicate to the author the observations that the journal considers most important for improving the manuscript, without revealing the reviewer's identity. Please indicate if any of your comments are addressed solely to the editorial board and not to the author.

To ensure that the editorial process is straightforward and to avoid keeping the authors waiting too long, please respond to the questionnaire as quickly as possible.

Evaluation report

You can consult the form sent to referees to conduct the review report at the following link.

Listings in databases, reputable directories and archives

Archives in which La Perinola is available:

Arts & Humanities Citation Index (Thomson Reuters)
Academic Search Complete (EBSCO)
Dialnet (Universidad de La Rioja)
Dialnet métricas (Universidad de La Rioja)
ERIH PLUS (European Reference Index for the Humanities and Social Sciences)
Fuente Académica Premier (EBSCO)
MLA - Modern Language Association Database (ProQuest)
Scopus

Repositories in which La Perinola is available:

Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra (DADUN)

Disclaimer


The content of articles is the sole responsibility of the authors. In no event shall the University of Navarra be responsible for the credibility and authenticity of articles.

Authors wishing to include images, figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.


Statement of good practice

The quality standards for scientific journals require the inclusion, as part of their general criteria, of a statement of good publishing practices to which the Editor, Editorial Board, reviewers and authors must adhere.

In this regard, La Perinola operates according to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Guidelines for the Editor, Editorial Board, reviewers and authors.

1. Editor's / Director's Obligations

La Perinola is governed by the ethical guidelines inspired by COPE Core Practices and Guidelines (2017). These guidelines apply to all those involved in the publication of the journal: editors and their journals, publishers and institutions. The COPE Core Practices will be taken into account in conjunction with national and international codes of conduct specific to research, which they are not intended to replace.


Responsibility: The Editor is responsible for the decision whether or not to publish the articles received. In addition, he/she is responsible for any other content published in his/her journal. To this end, he/she will ensure that articles are reviewed by experts in the field.

In making these decisions, the Editor should be guided both by the policies of the journal's Editorial Board and by legal requirements regarding defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The Editor may consult with other members of the Editorial Board or with reviewers in making publication decisions.


Journal Management: The Editor will work closely with a diverse and effective Editorial Board.

He/she will communicate regularly with all members with decision-making power over the journal and meet with them as often as necessary (virtually if necessary).

Actively will involve Editorial Board members in the peer review process where appropriate.


Access to and retention of data: the Editor may request authors to provide original data relating to a refereed paper. In any case, authors must be willing to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.


Fairness: During the evaluation process, the Editor shall assess only the scientific content of the articles, without letting aspects related to race, gender, religious beliefs, citizenship, ethnicity or political philosophy of the authors affect his/her decisions. It will avoid any bias in editorial decision-making.


Authorship: The Editor declines any responsibility for possible conflicts arising from the authorship of papers published in the journal.

The ideas, data and opinions expressed in the published works are the sole responsibility of the authors, who are also responsible for obtaining the corresponding permissions for publication, for ensuring that the published works are carried out in accordance with the ethical criteria governing research and that they are in accordance with professional ethics.


Confidentiality: The Editor and other members of the Editorial Board may only share information regarding submitted manuscripts with the author, reviewers, potential reviewers and others involved in the publication process.


Intellectual Property: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in the Editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Similarly, privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review should be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.


Inclusive Language: La Perinola adheres to the goals established by the United Nations whereby “using gender-inclusive language means speaking and writing in a way that does not discriminate against a particular sex, social gender or gender identity, and does not perpetuate gender stereotypes”. (https://www.un.org/es/gender-inclusive-language/index.shtml). 

This objective must be compatible with "other discursive or pragmatic postulates, such as those of equivalence, adequacy, convenience, aesthetics and, especially, the principle of economy" (Position of the RAE of January 16, 2020, § 8.1), and also with respect for the linguistic system. 

It is recommended to take into account the guidelines of the aforementioned United Nations website and the report and other publications of the Royal Spanish Academy (https://www.rae.es/sites/default/files/Informe_lenguaje_inclusivo.pdf).


Peer review processes: The Editor should endeavour to ensure a fair and appropriate peer review process. Editors should refrain (i.e. should ask a co-editor, associate editor or other member of the Editorial Board to review in their place) from reviewing manuscripts where they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies or institutions (possibly) related to the articles.


Post-publication discussions and corrections
: The Editor should require all contributors to disclose relevant competing interests and publish corrections if competing interests are disclosed after publication. If necessary, other appropriate action, such as publication of a retraction or an expression of concern should be taken.


Misconduct
: In cases of alleged or proven scientific misconduct, such as copyright infringement, fraudulent publication, plagiarism or self-plagiarism, the Publisher, in close cooperation with the journal Editors, will take all appropriate measures to clarify the situation and modify the article in question. This includes the prompt publication of an expression of concern or, in the most severe cases, the complete retraction of the work concerned.


Complaints and appeals: La Perinola will respond to all complaints or suspicions of research or publication misconduct raised by readers, reviewers, or other editors. The Editor will take reasonable action when ethical complaints are raised in connection with a submitted manuscript or published article. The journal will evaluate cases of possible plagiarism or duplicate/redundant publication related to a submitted manuscript or published article.

In other cases - publisher or reviewer misconduct - the journal may request an investigation by the institution itself or other appropriate bodies. Each reported act of unethical behaviour will be investigated, even if it is discovered years after publication.

In case of possible retraction, the Editor shall be guided by the COPE Retractions Guidelines.

In case of infringement of rights, the author is solely responsible for the consequences.

In cases of defamation and plagiarism, the Editor will reject the received papers.

In case of self-plagiarism, each case will be considered on a case-by-case basis. A decision will be taken on the basis of the amount of reused text, its nature - original research or not - the original source and the copyright. The decision will be based on the COPE Text Recycling Guidelines.


Complaints and Appeals: La Perinola will respond to all complaints or suspicions of research or publication misconduct raised by readers, reviewers, or other editors. The Editor will take reasonable action when ethical complaints are raised in connection with a submitted manuscript or published article. The journal will evaluate cases of possible plagiarism or duplicate/redundant publication related to a submitted manuscript or published article.

In other cases - publisher or reviewer misconduct - the journal may request an investigation by the institution itself or other appropriate bodies. Each reported act of unethical behaviour will be investigated, even if it is discovered years after publication.


Involvement and cooperation in research: the Editor must maintain the integrity of the scholarly record, prevent commercial needs from compromising intellectual and ethical standards, and always be ready to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies when necessary.

2. Reviewers' Obligations

Contribution to the editorial decision: The publication of an article in the journal La Perinola involves a double-blind peer review system. The reviewers will assist the Editorial Board in editorial decisions and will collaborate with the author to improve their work if necessary.

Qualification and timeliness: all selected reviewers must state whether they are qualified to review the proposed article and, if so, to deliver the review within the deadline. 


Confidentiality: any manuscript received by the reviewer must be treated as a confidential document. It should not be shown or discussed with anyone, unless authorised by the Editorial Board.


Standards of objectivity and respect: evaluations should be conducted with complete objectivity and using language that is respectful of the author and the work: personal criticism of the author is always inappropriate. Evaluators should express their reviews clearly and with arguments.


Acknowledgement of sources: where possible, reviewers should identify relevant publications that have not been cited by the authors. Reviewers should advise the Editor of any substantial similarities between the manuscript and any other publications of which they are aware.


Conflict of interest: Privileged information obtained in the review process must be considered confidential and may not be used for personal gain. Reviewers may not evaluate manuscripts that are in conflict of interest due to competitive, collaborative, or other connected relationships with the authors, companies, or institutions linked to the article in question.


Misconduct: reviewers must avoid situations of citation coercion, suggesting to authors citations to the journal in the reviewed articles; alteration of one's anonymity in double-blind peer review; any kind of predatory practices, such as the use of false names, demand for payment and false review; and simulated coordination of monographs, cases in which the journal does not allow the coordinator of a volume to review or decide which texts will be published, producing a "use" of the identity and academic prestige of the coordinator.

3. Authors' Obligations

Rules for the presentation of articles: authors should submit original and scientifically rigorous articles. They should also present an accurate description of the work performed, as well as an objective discussion of its importance. The underlying data should be accurately represented in the manuscript. The work must contain sufficient references to allow the reviewers to carry out their replications. Overt fraud is unacceptable behavior that violates the ethics of the procedure.


Personal data
: authors must provide their contact information to be used during the evaluation process and, if applicable, for the publication of the article. Personal information will not be provided to third parties or for use for other purposes.


Originality and plagiarism: authors agree to submit original papers and to cite appropriately, in accordance with the journal's guidelines, works by other authors.

In order to detect possible plagiarism, submitted papers will be analyzed with the Turnitin anti-plagiarism tool before being sent to reviewers.


Multiple or redundant publications: as a general rule, authors may not publish articles that contain results already published in other works. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal at the same time is unacceptable behavior that violates the ethics of the procedure.


Acknowledgement of sources: authors should provide an appropriate acknowledgement of the bibliographic sources that have made possible the preparation of their work.

In the case of use of an observation, derivation or argument that has been previously reported, the author must accompany it with the corresponding citation.

Authors who use artificial intelligence tools in the writing of a manuscript, the production of images or graphic elements of the article, or in the collection and analysis of data, should be transparent and declare how it was used and what tool was used. The authors are fully responsible for the content of their manuscript, including those parts produced by any artificial intelligence tool.


Authorship and contributorship of a manuscript: authorship will be limited to those persons who have taken part in the gestation, design and execution of the work.

All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. When there are other persons who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be named in an acknowledgements section. 

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate coauthors (as defined above) and no inappropriate coauthors are listed as authors of the manuscript, and that all coauthors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have accepted its submission for publication.

Artificial intelligence tools cannot be listed as an author of an article. They do not meet authorship requirements, as they cannot assume responsibility for an article. They lack legal personality, and cannot assert the presence or absence of conflicts of interest nor manage copyright agreements.


Conflict of interest: authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other conflicts of interest that could affect the results or their interpretation and therefore the evaluation of their work (e.g., employment, consultancies, property rights, honoraria, testimonials of contracted experts, patent applications/records, and grants or other funding).


Sources of funding: every author shall mention the sources of funding of the project that has given rise to the article.


Fundamental errors in published works: when an author discovers a significant error in his/her published work, it is his/her obligation to promptly communicate this fact to the Editor of the journal and cooperate with him/her in the withdrawal or correction of the article.

Inclusive language

La Perinola adheres to the goals established by the United Nations whereby “using gender-inclusive language means speaking and writing in a way that does not discriminate against a particular sex, social gender or gender identity, and does not perpetuate gender stereotypes”. (https://www.un.org/es/gender-inclusive-language/index.shtml). This objective must be compatible with "other discursive or pragmatic postulates, such as those of equivalence, adequacy, convenience, aesthetics and, especially, the principle of economy" ( Position of the RAE of January 16, 2020, § 8.1), and also with respect for the linguistic system. It is recommended to take into account the guidelines of the aforementioned United Nations website and the report and other publications of the Royal Spanish Academy (https://www.rae.es/sites/default/files/Informe_ lenguaje_inclusivo.pdf).

Publishing data

• Year founded: 1997
• Layout: J. Enrique duarte
• Print company: Printhaus
• Legal deposit: NA-2717-1997
• ISSN: 1138-6363
• e-ISSN: 2254-6359

Orders and Subscriptions

Check the information for subscribers.

If you wish to subscribe to or acquire single issues of any of our publications, please complete the following form.

Requests for Appendices to La Perinola should be addressed to:
Ediciones Universidad de Navarra (EUNSA)
Edificio Facultad de Comunicación
31009 Pamplona (España)
eunsa@eunsa.es

Prices

Check the price list.

Forms of payment:

The accepted payment methods are:
• Credit card: card type (VISA or MASTERCARD), card holder, number and expiry date.
• Bank transfer addressed to "Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra" with the invoice number. The bank account details are:
Banco Santander. Plaza del Castillo 39, 31001 Pamplona, España
IBAN: ES04 0075 4610 19 0600008016
BIC: BSCHESMM
(All bank transfers must include the IBAN and BIC codes).
• Direct debit: account holder, account number (20 digits) and bank details (name and address of the branch). Direct debit payments can only be made from Spanish banks.