Conception and strategic management of publics in the energy companies in Spain

Kathy Matilla e-mail(Login required) , Paul Capriotti e-mail(Login required) , Andrea Oliveira e-mail(Login required)

Article Sidebar

PDF (67) PDF (Español) (365)
View in DADUN
Published: Jan 1, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/003.28.35969
How to Cite
Matilla, K., Capriotti, P., & Oliveira, A. (2015). Conception and strategic management of publics in the energy companies in Spain. Communication & Society, 28(1), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.28.35969

Main Article Content

Authors

Kathy Matilla e-mail(Login required)
Ramón Llull University.
Paul Capriotti e-mail(Login required)
University Rovira i Virgili.
Andrea Oliveira e-mail(Login required)
University of Girona.

Abstract

281
The notion of publics as specifics and segmented groups has been a paradigm shift in public relations and corporate communication. This change in the way of understanding the receiver in the communication process allows communicate function to manage the relationship between the organization and those groups more effectively. For this reason, organizations should implement processes of identifying and prioritizing publics to communicate and be engaged with these groups in a strategic and effective way. The aim of this paper is to know what conception of “publics” prevails in the communication departments of natural gas and electricity companies in Spain, and on the other hand to assess the level of coherence /correlation between the identification and prioritization of strategic publics and the design of communicative actions to strategically manage the relationship between the organizations and these groups. The methodology of the quantitative study was aimed at Spanish energy companies and implemented through a questionnaire in an online platform. The results indicate that there is a dichotomy in the idea of publics in energy companies: on the one hand, they are conceived as specific groups, and on the other hand, they are considered as a massive collective. Nevertheless, it is observed that there is a methodological consistency between the importance assigned to the publics and the implementation of communication actions towards them.

Keywords

Energy sector enterprises, public relations, publics, identification, segmentation prioritization, corporate communication

References

Austin, E.W. & Pinkleton, B.E. (2006). Strategic Public Relations Management: Planning and Managing Effective Communication Programs. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Black, S. (1994). Las Relaciones Públicas: un factor clave de gestión (2ª ed.). Barcelona: Hispano Europea.

Botan, C.H. & Soto, F. (1988). A semiotic approach to the internal functioning of publics: implications for strategic communication and public relations. Public Relations Review 24(1), 21-44.

Broom, G.M. & Dozier, D.M. (1990). Using Research in Public Relations: Applications to program Management. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Broom, G.M., Casey, S. & Ritchey, J. (1997). Toward a Concept and Theory of OrganizationPublic Relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research 9(2), 83-98.

Bruning, S.D. & Ledingham, J.A. (1999). Relationships between organizations and publics: Development of a multi-dimensional organization-public relationship scale. Public Relations Review 25(2), 157-170.

Bruning, S.D., DeMiglio, P.A. & Embry, K. (2006). Mutual benefit as outcome indicator: Factors influencing perceptions of benefit in organization–public relationships. Public Relations Review 32(3), 33-40.

Capriotti, P. (2009). Branding Corporativo. Santiago de Chile: Colección de Libros de la Empresa. Retrieved from http://www.analisisdemedios.com/branding/BrandingCorporativo.pdf

Choo, G. (2006). Audiences, Stakeholders, Publics. In R. Tench & L. Yeomans (Eds.), Exploring Public Relations (pp. 234-248). London: Prentice Hall.

Comisión Nacional de Energía (CNE). Retrieved from http://www.cne.es/cne/contenido.jsp?id_nodo=279&&&keyword=&auditoria=F

Hallahan, K. (2000). Inactive Publics: The forgotten publics in public relations. Public Relations Review 26(4), 499-515.

Haridakis, P.M. & Whitmore, E.H. (2006). Understanding Electronic Media Audiences: The Pioneering Research of Alan M. Rubin. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 50(4), 766-774.

Harris, T.L. (1988). Value-added public relations: the secret weapon of integrated marketing. Chicago: Lincolnwood - NTC Business Books.

Harrison, S. (2000). Public Relations: an introduction. London: Thompson.

Hendrix, J. & Darrell, H. (2010). Public Relations Cases (2ª ed.). California: Wadsworth.

Holtzhausen, D.R. (2005). Public relations practice and political change in South Africa. Public Relations Review 31(3), 407–416.

Hong, H., Park, H., Lee, Y. & Park, J. (2002). Public Segmentation and Government-Public Relationship Building: A Cluster Analysis of Publics in the United States and 19 European Countries. Journal of Public Relations Research 22(1), 37-68.

Hutt, R.W. (2010). Identifying and mapping stakeholders: an industry case study. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 15(2), 181-190.

Jaegersberg, G. & Ure, J. (2011). Barriers to knowledge sharing and stakeholder alignment in solar energy clusters: Learning from other sectors and regions. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 20(1), 343-354.

Long, L.V. & Hazelton, V. (1987). Public Relations: a theoretical and practical response. Public Relations Review 13(2), 3-13.

Karlberg, M. (1996). Remembering the public in public relation research: from theoretical to operational symmetry. Journal of Public Relations Research 8(4), 263-278.

Kent, M. & Taylor, M. (1998). Building dialogic relationships through the world wide web. Public Relations Review 24 (3), 321–34.

Kim, S., Park, J.H. & Wertz, E.K. (2010). Expectation gaps between stakeholders and web-based corporate public relations efforts: Focusing on Fortune 500 corporate web site. Public Relations Review 36(3), 215-221.

Kunsch, M.M.K. (2003). Planejamento de Relações Públicas na Comunicação Integrada (edición ampliada). São Paulo: Summus.

Marconi, J. (2004). Public Relations: The Complete Guide. New York: Thomson.

Matilla, K. (2009). Conceptos Fundamentales en la Planificación Estratégica de las Relaciones Públicas. Barcelona: UOC.

Matilla, K. & Marca, G. (2012). The accountability gap: The use of preliminary and evaluative research in Spain. Public Relations Review 38(5), 825-830.

Míguez González, M. I. (2010). Los públicos en las relaciones públicas. Barcelona: UOC.

Moser, S. (2006, November 20). Talk of the city: engaging urbanites on climate change. Environmental Research Letters 1(1). Retrieved from http://www.susannemoser.com/documents/Moser_erl6_1_014006_final.pdf

Newsom, D., Turk, J.V. & Kruckeberg, D. (2004). This is PR: the realities of public relations. Belmont: Thomson.

Nisber, M. & Kotcher, J. (2009). A Two-Step Flow of Influence? Opinion-Leader Campaigns on Climate Change. Science Communication 30(3), 328-354.

Oliveira, A., Capriotti, P. (2013). Gestión estratégica de los públicos en museos. De la identificación a la comunicación. El profesional de la Información 22(3), 210-214.

Oliver, S. (2001). Public Relations Strategy. London: Kogan Page.

Oxley, H. (1989). The principles of public relations. London: Kogan Page.

Park, N. & Jeong, J. (2011). Finding publics within the blogosphere: the blogger public segmentation model. Asian Journal of Communication 21(4), 389-408.

Pearce, J.A. & Robinson, R.B. (1982). Strategic Management: Strategy Formulation and Implantation. Irwin: Homewood.

Price, V. (1994). La Opinión Pública: Esfera Pública y Comunicación. Barcelona: Paidós.

Robbins, S. (1987). Organization Theory. Englewood Cliffs, California: Prentice Hall.

Rodríguez-Polo, X.R. (2011 February-April). Los efectos de la comunicación de masas de Josep T. Klapper. Razón y Palabra 75. Retrieved from http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/N/N75/index75.html

Seitel, F.P. (2002). Teoría y práctica de las relaciones públicas. Madrid: Prentice Hall.

Simon, R. (1986). Relaciones Públicas. Teoría y Práctica. México: Limusa.

Smith, R.D. (2005). Strategic Planning for Public Relations (2ª ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Vasquez, G. M. (1993). A homo narrans paradigma for public relations: combining Bormann’s symbolic convergence theory and Grunig’s situational theory of publics. Journal of Public Relation Research 5(3), 201-216.

Villafañe, J. (1993). Imagen positiva: gestión estratégica de la imagen de las empresas. Madrid: Pirámide.

Webster, J.G. (1998). The audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 42(2), 190-207.

Wilcox, D.L., Cameron, G.T., Ault, P. & Agree, W.K. (2006). Public Relations: Strategies and tactics. Boston, Massachussets: Pearson.

Xifra, J. (1999). Les relacions públiques, ciència del diàleg. Girona: Universitat de Girona.

Xifra, J. (2003). Teoría y estructura de las relaciones públicas. Madrid: McGraw Hill.

Metrics

Search GoogleScholar



Details

Article Details

Issue
Vol 28 No 1 (2015)
Section
Articles

RIGHTS TRANSFER

By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.

In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.

The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.

Licencia de Creative Commons
Communication & Society is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0.