The right to be forgotten on the Internet for children and teenagers. A survey in Spain
Article Sidebar
See on DADUN
435)How to Cite
686
Abstract
The right to be forgotten is one of the hallmarks of privacy regulation on the Internet. The article explores the arguments advocating for a right to be forgotten specifically in cases regarding children, and examines whether minors see the need for such a right. In doing so, it addresses criticism that children’s rights studies often fail to consider the views of minors. The methodology adopted consists firstly of a literary review on children’s right to be forgotten. This work was complemented by a survey of 652 children and teenagers between the ages of 13 and 18, from all Spanish regions, which offered evidence of their views on the right to be forgotten.
References
Ammari, T., Kumar, P., Lampe, C. & Schoenebeck, S. (2015). Managing children’s online identities: How parents decide what to disclose about their children online. Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1895–1904. https://www.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702325
Azurmendi, A., Etayo, C. & Torrell, A. (2021). Sharenting y derechos digitales de los niños y adolescentes. Profesional de la información, 30(4), e300407. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.jul.07
Azurmendi, A. (2018). Derechos digitales de los menores y datos masivos. Reglamento europeo de protección de datos de 2016 y la Coppa de Estados Unidos. Profesional de la información, 27(1), 27-35. https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.ene.03
Bessant, C. (2018). Sharenting: balancing the conflicting rights of parents and children. Communications Law, 23(1), 7-24. Retrieved from https://infolawcentre.blogs.sas.ac.uk/files/2018/03/Comms_Law_23.1.pdf
Beutell, J. M. (2020). Children’s rights and social media: An analysis of TikTok’s Terms of Service through the lens of a young user. Conference paper. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2142/106069
Blum-Ross, A. & Livingstone, S. (2017). Sharenting’, parent blogging, and the boundaries of the digital self. Popular Communication, 15(2), 110-125. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2016.1223300
Buitelaar, J. C. (2018). Child’s best interest and informational self-determination: what the GDPR can learn from children’s rights. International Data Privacy Law, 8(4), 293-308. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipy006
Burguera Ameave, L. (2013). Autodeterminación informativa de los menores. In S. Pérez Álvarez, L. Burguera Ameave & K. P. Larrañaga (Dirs.), Menores e Internet (pp. 321-341). Cizur: Thomson Reuters Aranzadi.
Coleman, S., Pothong, K., Perez-Vallejo, E. & Koene, A. (2017). The Internet on our own terms: how children and young people deliberated about their digital rights. Leeds: Horizon Digital, University of Leeds, University of Nottingham.
Cowden, M. (2016). Children’s Rights. From Philosophy to Public Policy. New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.
Dehghan, S. (17.04.2018). How does California’s Erasure Law stack up against the EU’s right to be forgotten? IAPP Privacy Perspectives. Retrieved from https://iapp.org/news/a/how-does-californias-erasure-law-stack-up-against-the-eus-right-to-be-forgotten/
De-Wolf, R. (2020). Contextualizing how teens manage personal and interpersonal privacy on social media. New Media & Society, 22(6), 1058-1075. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1461444819876570
Draper, N. (2019). Reputation anxiety. Communication, Culture & Critique, 12(1), 36-52. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcz010 .
Feldman, D. & Haberp, E. (2020). Measuring and protecting privacy in the always-on. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 35(1), 198-250. Retrieved from https://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1174614. https://www.doi.org/10.15779/Z38HH6C63R
Gaspar, J., Beurkens, N., Havert, C. D., Bain, M., Masip, M., Guerrero, M., Powell, G. & Amorós, J. (2021). Screen Time all the Time. Apps and kids: A year trapped behind screens. Retrieved from https://qweb.cdn.prismic.io/qweb/da3cbc01-68b0-4e50-a18f-a9a3a0c74a72_EN_Kids+and+Apps+annual+report_20210408.pdf
Garitaonandia, C., Karrera-Xuarros, I., Jiménez-Iglesias, E. & Larrañaga, N. (2020). Menores conectados y riesgos online: contenidos inadecuados, uso inapropiado de la información y uso excesivo de internet. Profesional de la información, 29(4). https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.jul.36
Haley, K. (2020). Sharenting and the (potential) right to be Forgotten. Indiana Law Journal, 95(3), 1005-1020. Retrieved from https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol95/iss3/9
Jin-Young, K. (2018). A study of social media users’ perceptional typologies and relationships to self-identity and personality. Internet Research, 28(3), 767-784. Retrieved from www.emeraldinsight.com/1066-2243.htm
Kopecky, K., Szotkowski, R., Aznar-Díaz, I. & Romero-Rodríguez, J. M. (2020). The phenomenon of sharenting and its risks in the online environment. Experiences from Czech Republic and Spain. Children and Youth Services Review, 110, 1-6. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104812
Lievens, E. & Vander Maelen, C. (2019). El derecho al olvido de los niños: ¿dejar atrás el pasado y aceptar el futuro? Latin American Law Review, 2, 65-84. https://www.doi.org/10.29263/lar02.2019.03
Mc Cullagh, K. (2016). SNSs—Privacy as “information control”. In T. Bräutigam & S. Miettinen (Eds.), Data protection, privacy and European regulation in the digital age (pp. 114-120). Helsinki: Unigrafia.
Leurs, K. & Shepherd, T. (2017). Datafication & Discrimination. In M.T. Schäfer & K. Van Es (Eds.), The Datafied Society (pp. 201-232). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Kumar Sinha, A. (2019). Protection of rights of India’s children in a digital society - A rights-based framework. Situation Analysis of Children’s Rights in the age of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence and Recommendations for Legal and Systemic Provisions to Protect Children from Harm in a Digital World. Policy paper series – Digital media and society, NO. DMS-PP-2019-01. Delhi: Flairindia. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/38333713/PROTECTION_OF_CHILDRENS_Rights_in_a_Digital_Society_FLAIR.pdf
Pew Research Center (2020). Parenting children in the age of screens. Washington D.C.: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2020/07/28/parents-attitudes-and-experiences-related-to-digital-technology.
Piñar-Mañas, J. L. (2018). Derecho de identidad. In T. De la Quadra Salcedo & J. L. Piñar Mañas (Dirs.), Sociedad Digital y Derecho (pp. 95-112). Madrid: Boletín Oficial del Estado, Ministerio de Industria, Comercio y Turismo.
Reding, V. (2014). A data protection compact for Europe. Speech. 28.1.2014. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/cs/SPEECH_14_62
Rosani, D. (2019). Combating Discrimination: Internet Literacy to Strengthen Children’s Rights in the Digital Environment. Revista Publicum, 5(2), 106-128. https://www.doi.org/10.12957/publicum.2019.47203
Ross, S. (14.1.2015). California enacts “Right to be Forgotten” for Minors. Compliance and risk management, General. Retrieved from https://www.dataprotectionreport.com/2015/01/california-enacts-right-to-be-forgotten-for-minors/
Verswijvel, K., Walrave, M., Hardie, K. & Heirman, W. (2019). Sharenting, is it a good or a bad thing? Understanding how adolescents think and feel about sharenting on social network sites. Children and Youth Services Review, 104, 1-10. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104401
Werro, F. (2020). The Right to Be Forgotten. In F. Werro (Ed.), The Right To Be Forgotten A Comparative Study of the Emergent Right’s Evolution and Application in Europe, the Americas, and Asia (pp. 1-38). Cham: Springer. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33512-0
Acronyms
GDPR: General Data Protection Regulation.
COPPA: Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.
Issue
Section
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communicaton & Society, the AUTHOR grants exclusive economic and/or exploitation rights: reproduction, distribution, public communication, transformation/translation/creation of derivative works, and commercialisation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal period in force -the author's lifetime and seventy years after his or her death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future publishing modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication, this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.